Clinical and neuroimaging determinants of minimally conscious and persistent vegetative states after acute stroke

Q4 Nursing Journal of Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2019-06-19 DOI:10.18700/JNC.190080
E. Kumral, F. Bayam, Bedriye Köken, C. Erdoğan
{"title":"Clinical and neuroimaging determinants of minimally conscious and persistent vegetative states after acute stroke","authors":"E. Kumral, F. Bayam, Bedriye Köken, C. Erdoğan","doi":"10.18700/JNC.190080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with persistent vegetative state (PVS) show no evidence of awareness of self or their environment, and those with minimally conscious state (MCS) have severely impaired consciousness with minimal but definite behavioral evidence of self or environmental awareness after stroke. Neuroimaging and clinical characteristics separating these two close consciousness states after stroke were insufficiently studied. Methods: We conducted a hospital-based cohort study of all patients with stroke (2011 to 2017) who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging and consciousness assessment after 3 months of inclusion. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the relative risk of neuroimaging markers for differentiation of PVS and MCS. Results: Of 3,600 eligible subjects, 323 patients (0.09%) had PVS and 93 (0.02%) had MCS (mean age, 62.25±13.4 years). Higher stroke volume was strongly associated with PVS compared to MCS (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.00; P=0.001). On univariate analysis, cingulate gyrus (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.62 to 4.36; P=0.001) and corpus callosum (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.44; P=0.003) involvement was significantly associated with PVS. However, on multivariate analysis, only cingulate gyrus involvement was independently associated with PVS (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.72; P=0.002). Conclusion: Our results indicate that PVS and MCS are different consciousness states according to clinical and neuroimaging findings. To predict outcome, cognitive performance of these patients should be well questioned after stroke.","PeriodicalId":33246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18700/JNC.190080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Patients with persistent vegetative state (PVS) show no evidence of awareness of self or their environment, and those with minimally conscious state (MCS) have severely impaired consciousness with minimal but definite behavioral evidence of self or environmental awareness after stroke. Neuroimaging and clinical characteristics separating these two close consciousness states after stroke were insufficiently studied. Methods: We conducted a hospital-based cohort study of all patients with stroke (2011 to 2017) who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging and consciousness assessment after 3 months of inclusion. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the relative risk of neuroimaging markers for differentiation of PVS and MCS. Results: Of 3,600 eligible subjects, 323 patients (0.09%) had PVS and 93 (0.02%) had MCS (mean age, 62.25±13.4 years). Higher stroke volume was strongly associated with PVS compared to MCS (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.00; P=0.001). On univariate analysis, cingulate gyrus (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.62 to 4.36; P=0.001) and corpus callosum (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.44; P=0.003) involvement was significantly associated with PVS. However, on multivariate analysis, only cingulate gyrus involvement was independently associated with PVS (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.72; P=0.002). Conclusion: Our results indicate that PVS and MCS are different consciousness states according to clinical and neuroimaging findings. To predict outcome, cognitive performance of these patients should be well questioned after stroke.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性脑卒中后最低意识和持续性植物人状态的临床和神经影像学决定因素
背景:持续性植物状态(PVS)患者没有自我意识或环境意识的证据,而最低意识状态(MCS)患者在中风后意识严重受损,自我意识或环境意识的行为证据很少但明确。脑卒中后这两种紧密意识状态的神经影像学和临床特征研究不足。方法:我们对2011年至2017年所有脑卒中患者进行了一项基于医院的队列研究,这些患者在纳入3个月后接受了3T磁共振成像和意识评估。采用单因素和多因素回归分析来估计PVS和MCS分化的神经影像学标志物的相对风险。结果:在3600名符合条件的受试者中,323例(0.09%)患有PVS, 93例(0.02%)患有MCS(平均年龄62.25±13.4岁)。与MCS相比,较高的卒中容量与PVS密切相关(优势比[OR], 0.99;95%置信区间[CI], 0.98 ~ 1.00;P = 0.001)。单因素分析,扣带回(OR, 2.7;95% CI, 1.62 ~ 4.36;P=0.001)和胼胝体(OR, 2.1;95% CI, 1.28 ~ 3.44;P=0.003)受累与PVS显著相关。然而,在多变量分析中,只有扣带回受累与PVS独立相关(OR, 2.2;95% CI, 1.33 ~ 3.72;P = 0.002)。结论:从临床和影像学表现来看,PVS和MCS是不同的意识状态。为了预测结果,这些患者中风后的认知表现应该受到很好的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Journal of Neurocritical Care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accessory posterior cerebral artery (PCA): a rare variant of PCA Basilar artery hypoplasia with persistent fetal circulations misinterpreted as basilar artery occlusion in a non-invasive angiography A case report of pitfall of fever and altered mental status: cerebral malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum in an adult traveler returning from Congo Extremely elevated international normalized ratio in a patient using dabigatran etexilate: a case report Management strategies for refractory status epilepticus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1