Is Africa a pollution haven or halo Evidence from 20 largest FDI recipient countries in Africa

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Green Economics Pub Date : 2020-07-06 DOI:10.1504/ijge.2020.10030417
Dagmawe Tenaw
{"title":"Is Africa a pollution haven or halo Evidence from 20 largest FDI recipient countries in Africa","authors":"Dagmawe Tenaw","doi":"10.1504/ijge.2020.10030417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With an increasing amount of FDI flows to Africa, much concern about the potential effects of FDI on the environment has been raised. Accordingly, this study investigates the environmental effect of FDI and checks the validity of pollution haven and/or halo hypotheses in 20 largest FDI recipient African countries over the period 1990-2017 using Cross-Sectionally Augmented Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL) estimator in a Dynamic Common Correlated Effects (DCCE) approach. Coming to the main estimation results, FDI is found to have no significant environmental effects, indicating neither pollution-haven nor pollution-halo hypothesis is valid in Africa. However, the estimates across individual countries confirm mixed evidence regarding the two hypotheses. Further, livestock production is found as the major driving force of environmental degradation in the region. Finally, the study suggests that environmental concerns should not be overlooked while pursuing pro-growth FDI-related policies given that FDI is perceived as a good channel for positive environmental spillovers to host countries.","PeriodicalId":35060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Green Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Green Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2020.10030417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With an increasing amount of FDI flows to Africa, much concern about the potential effects of FDI on the environment has been raised. Accordingly, this study investigates the environmental effect of FDI and checks the validity of pollution haven and/or halo hypotheses in 20 largest FDI recipient African countries over the period 1990-2017 using Cross-Sectionally Augmented Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL) estimator in a Dynamic Common Correlated Effects (DCCE) approach. Coming to the main estimation results, FDI is found to have no significant environmental effects, indicating neither pollution-haven nor pollution-halo hypothesis is valid in Africa. However, the estimates across individual countries confirm mixed evidence regarding the two hypotheses. Further, livestock production is found as the major driving force of environmental degradation in the region. Finally, the study suggests that environmental concerns should not be overlooked while pursuing pro-growth FDI-related policies given that FDI is perceived as a good channel for positive environmental spillovers to host countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲是污染天堂还是光环来自非洲20个最大外国直接投资接受国的证据
随着流入非洲的外国直接投资越来越多,人们对外国直接投资对环境的潜在影响感到非常关切。因此,本研究利用动态共同相关效应(DCCE)方法中的横截面增强自回归分布滞后(CS-ARDL)估计器,调查了1990-2017年期间20个最大的非洲FDI接收国的FDI环境影响,并检验了污染避风港和/或光环假设的有效性。从主要估计结果来看,FDI没有显著的环境影响,表明污染避风港假说和污染光环假说在非洲都不成立。然而,个别国家的估计证实了关于这两种假设的混合证据。此外,畜牧业生产被认为是该地区环境退化的主要驱动力。最后,研究表明,考虑到外国直接投资被视为对东道国产生积极环境溢出效应的良好渠道,在推行促进增长的外国直接投资相关政策时,不应忽视环境问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Green Economics
International Journal of Green Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: IJGE, a peer-reviewed international journal, proposes and fosters discussion on all aspects of Green Economics. It contributes to international research and practice in Green Economics with the aim of encouraging economic change and the positioning of Green Economics at the centre of the Economics disciplines. Green Economic theories and policies, tools, instruments and metrics are developed with the aim of offering practical and theoretical solutions and proposals to facilitate a change to the current economic models for the benefit of the widest number of people and the planet as a whole. IJGE focuses particularly on resource management, on meeting peoples’ needs and the impact and effects of international trends and how to increase social justice.
期刊最新文献
Importance of Social Videogaming for Connection with Others During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The eco-environmental costs of conflicts Customer attitudes towards organic products and their impact on satisfaction - an empirical study Four principles for a human rights-based approach to development without growth Evaluating the factors influencing consumers willingness to buy plant-based meat alternatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1