The Opioid Documents: A Report on the Politics of the Public Record

Q2 Arts and Humanities The social history of alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1086/713409
A. Lentacker
{"title":"The Opioid Documents: A Report on the Politics of the Public Record","authors":"A. Lentacker","doi":"10.1086/713409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lawyers in the ongoing opioid litigation have obtained millions of documents from the drug manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies blamed for the ravages of the opioid crisis. What will happen to these documents if the suits are settled? Will they form a public archive of one of the worst man-made public health disasters in memory? Or will they remain locked away, perhaps permanently? In search for answers, this piece traces a longer history of the role of the courts in shaping the public record on drugs. It discusses what the recent scholarship on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical knowledge owes to past litigation against the drug industry, but also highlights some of the forces that have eroded the public record in both the scientific and legal arenas over the last few decades. These forces, I argue, have converged in the case of opioids, raising urgent questions about the implications of litigating public health issues in secret.","PeriodicalId":53627,"journal":{"name":"The social history of alcohol and drugs","volume":"35 1","pages":"137 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713409","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The social history of alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Lawyers in the ongoing opioid litigation have obtained millions of documents from the drug manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies blamed for the ravages of the opioid crisis. What will happen to these documents if the suits are settled? Will they form a public archive of one of the worst man-made public health disasters in memory? Or will they remain locked away, perhaps permanently? In search for answers, this piece traces a longer history of the role of the courts in shaping the public record on drugs. It discusses what the recent scholarship on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical knowledge owes to past litigation against the drug industry, but also highlights some of the forces that have eroded the public record in both the scientific and legal arenas over the last few decades. These forces, I argue, have converged in the case of opioids, raising urgent questions about the implications of litigating public health issues in secret.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类文件:一份关于公共记录政治的报告
正在进行的阿片类药物诉讼的律师已经从药品制造商、分销商和药店那里获得了数百万份文件,这些文件被认为是造成阿片类药物危机的罪魁祸首。如果诉讼解决了,这些文件怎么办?它们是否会形成记忆中最严重的人为公共卫生灾难之一的公共档案?还是说他们会一直被关起来,也许是永远关起来?为了寻找答案,这篇文章追溯了法院在塑造公众毒品记录方面的作用的更长的历史。它讨论了最近关于制药和制药知识的学术研究归功于过去针对制药行业的诉讼,但也强调了过去几十年来在科学和法律领域侵蚀公共记录的一些力量。我认为,在阿片类药物问题上,这些力量已经汇聚在一起,引发了关于秘密提起公共卫生诉讼的影响的紧迫问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The social history of alcohol and drugs
The social history of alcohol and drugs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
From Political Action to Effective Technology: Reassembling the Social Science of Prevention in the US since 1970 Carceral Pharmacology: Historicizing the Sciences of Cannabis and Pregnancy Regulation of Alcohol in Greco-Roman Antiquity Prohibition and Negotiation: Alcoholic Beverages and Taverns in Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Istanbul :Imperial Wine: How the British Empire Made Wine’s New World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1