Translation, cross‐cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of a Danish version of the Tegner Activity Scale

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI:10.1002/tsm2.251
J. Jacobsen, Martina Lind, Marianne Godt Hansen, R. Rasmussen, Birgitte Blaabjerg, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaaard
{"title":"Translation, cross‐cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of a Danish version of the Tegner Activity Scale","authors":"J. Jacobsen, Martina Lind, Marianne Godt Hansen, R. Rasmussen, Birgitte Blaabjerg, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaaard","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) has been used in several Danish studies. However, the TAS has not been cross‐culturally adapted into Danish. We aimed to translate the TAS into Danish and to evaluate its measurement properties in patients with knee disorders. The TAS was translated into Danish following international guidelines. The measurement properties were evaluated in 86 patients (median: 25 years). For reliability, 56 patients completed the scale twice within 9 days. Responsiveness and interpretability were evaluated in 64 patients completing the TAS 6 months later. For reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.7 (CI: 0.6‐0.8), the standard error of measurement was 0.7 points (CI: 0.6‐0.9), the smallest detectable change was 2.1 points (CI: 1.7‐2.5), and the limits of agreement were −1.7‐2.4 points. For responsiveness, the correlation between the TAS change score and the Global Rating of Change Scale was 0.3 (CI: 0.1‐0.5). In patients reporting improved knee condition, 55% reported a TAS change score of minimum 1 point. For interpretability, the minimal clinically important change was 0.7 points (SD: 1.4), and no floor or ceiling effects were found. In conclusion, the Danish version of the TAS has acceptable test‐retest reliability. However, the TAS seems less adequate to evaluate changes over time.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) has been used in several Danish studies. However, the TAS has not been cross‐culturally adapted into Danish. We aimed to translate the TAS into Danish and to evaluate its measurement properties in patients with knee disorders. The TAS was translated into Danish following international guidelines. The measurement properties were evaluated in 86 patients (median: 25 years). For reliability, 56 patients completed the scale twice within 9 days. Responsiveness and interpretability were evaluated in 64 patients completing the TAS 6 months later. For reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.7 (CI: 0.6‐0.8), the standard error of measurement was 0.7 points (CI: 0.6‐0.9), the smallest detectable change was 2.1 points (CI: 1.7‐2.5), and the limits of agreement were −1.7‐2.4 points. For responsiveness, the correlation between the TAS change score and the Global Rating of Change Scale was 0.3 (CI: 0.1‐0.5). In patients reporting improved knee condition, 55% reported a TAS change score of minimum 1 point. For interpretability, the minimal clinically important change was 0.7 points (SD: 1.4), and no floor or ceiling effects were found. In conclusion, the Danish version of the TAS has acceptable test‐retest reliability. However, the TAS seems less adequate to evaluate changes over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦语版特格纳活动量表的翻译、跨文化适应和测量特性
Tegner活动量表(TAS)已用于丹麦的几项研究。然而,TAS并没有被跨文化地改编成丹麦语。我们的目的是将TAS翻译成丹麦语,并评估其在膝关节疾病患者中的测量特性。TAS按照国际准则被翻译成丹麦语。对86名患者(中位数:25年)的测量特性进行了评估。为了可靠性,56名患者在9天内完成了两次量表。对6个月后完成TAS的64名患者的反应性和可解释性进行了评估。就可靠性而言,组内相关系数为0.7(CI:0.6-0.8),测量的标准误差为0.7点(CI=0.6-0.9),最小可检测变化为2.1点(CI:1.7-2.5),一致性限为-1.7-2.4点。在反应性方面,TAS变化评分与全球变化评分量表之间的相关性为0.3(CI:0.1-0.5)。在报告膝关节状况改善的患者中,55%的患者报告TAS变化得分至少为1分。就可解释性而言,最小的临床重要变化为0.7分(SD:1.4),未发现下限或上限效应。总之,丹麦版本的TAS具有可接受的测试-再测试可靠性。然而,TAS似乎不足以评估一段时间内的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Anatomical Cross-Sectional Area of Psoas Major Muscle Using an Ultrasound Imaging System Combined With an Inertial Measurement Unit: Improved Reliability in the US Using IMU-Based Positioning Techniques. Effect of 1-Week Weight Loss While Maintaining Total Body Water on Jump Performance. Lower Extremity Asymmetry Values Derived From Multiple Strength Testing Modes Are Associated With Perceived Functional Capabilities Among University Athletes. Athlete Monitoring Systems in Elite Men's Basketball: Challenges, Recommendations, and Future Perspectives. An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1