The Uses of Magic: Local Knowledge and the 'Unscientific Native' in Colonial Malaya

F. Noor
{"title":"The Uses of Magic: Local Knowledge and the 'Unscientific Native' in Colonial Malaya","authors":"F. Noor","doi":"10.1353/ras.2021.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Colonial violence cannot simply be studied by looking at the instances of wars and battles fought in the age of Empire. Equally important is the working of epistemic violence and the violence that accompanies the process of learning about, framing and categorizing the colonized Other. This paper looks at one aspect of colonial Othering in particular, which is the manner in which colonial functionaries and scholars turned their attention to the local knowledge/s of those who came under colonial rule, and how in the course of collecting, codifying and categorizing these knowledges native texts, histories and narratives were systematically devalued—as 'mythologies', 'legends', or fairy-tales—and in due course relegated to a secondary register as 'non-knowledge' that could not be instrumentalised to serve the needs of racialized colonial-capitalism. Focusing in particular on the works of Walter William Skeat with those of his co-authors Charles Otto Blagden and A. Hillman—officials who were embedded in the machinery of British rule in Malaya—this paper will look at how their study of Malay customs and beliefs was based on Western/Eurocentric understandings of (rational, instrumental) knowledge that in turn downgraded other non-Western epistemologies and belief-systems; and by doing so contributed to the notion of the lazy/backward/unscientific native Other.","PeriodicalId":39524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","volume":"94 1","pages":"119 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Colonial violence cannot simply be studied by looking at the instances of wars and battles fought in the age of Empire. Equally important is the working of epistemic violence and the violence that accompanies the process of learning about, framing and categorizing the colonized Other. This paper looks at one aspect of colonial Othering in particular, which is the manner in which colonial functionaries and scholars turned their attention to the local knowledge/s of those who came under colonial rule, and how in the course of collecting, codifying and categorizing these knowledges native texts, histories and narratives were systematically devalued—as 'mythologies', 'legends', or fairy-tales—and in due course relegated to a secondary register as 'non-knowledge' that could not be instrumentalised to serve the needs of racialized colonial-capitalism. Focusing in particular on the works of Walter William Skeat with those of his co-authors Charles Otto Blagden and A. Hillman—officials who were embedded in the machinery of British rule in Malaya—this paper will look at how their study of Malay customs and beliefs was based on Western/Eurocentric understandings of (rational, instrumental) knowledge that in turn downgraded other non-Western epistemologies and belief-systems; and by doing so contributed to the notion of the lazy/backward/unscientific native Other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
魔法的使用:马来亚殖民地的当地知识和“不科学的原住民”
摘要:殖民暴力不能简单地通过观察帝国时代的战争和战斗实例来研究。同样重要的是认知暴力的作用,以及在学习、构建和分类被殖民的他者的过程中产生的暴力。本文特别关注了殖民他人的一个方面,即殖民官员和学者将注意力转向殖民统治下的当地知识的方式,以及在收集、编纂和分类这些知识的过程中,土著文本、历史和叙事如何被系统地贬低为“神话”、“传说”、“神话”和“传说”。或者童话故事——在适当的时候被贬为“非知识”,不能被用来满足种族化的殖民资本主义的需要。本文将特别关注Walter William Skeat及其合著者Charles Otto Blagden和A. hillman的作品,这些官员被嵌入英国在马来亚的统治机制中,本文将研究他们对马来习俗和信仰的研究是如何基于西方/欧洲中心对(理性的、工具的)知识的理解,而这种理解反过来又贬低了其他非西方认识论和信仰体系;并因此助长了懒惰/落后/不科学的本土他者的观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
James Carnegy and the ‘Country Trade’ in Penang, c.1802–1824 History in the Malaysian Public Sphere The Comfort Women of Singapore in History and Memory by Kevin Blackburn (review) An Illustrious Heritage: The History of Tan Tock Seng and Family ed. by Kua Bak Lim, Lim How Seng and Roney Tan (review) Belitung, the afterlives of a shipwreck by Natali Pearson (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1