An evaluation of offsite construction skill profiles

B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat
{"title":"An evaluation of offsite construction skill profiles","authors":"B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat","doi":"10.1108/JFMPC-08-2020-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to evaluate the existing and emerging Offsite Construction (OSC) skills. Construction industry is inherently labour oriented, fashioning poor labour productivity, low sustainability, slow and costly processes. These shortcomings promote OSC alongside driving forces such as industrialisation, automation and digitalisation. However, the traditional construction skills are not on par with the complexity, where robots, co-bots and digital-driven automated systems create the need for novel OSC skills.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData collection is executed through a Roundtable activity hosting Construction Management academics form Australian universities specialising in construction technology. They engaged in ranking of skills along with creating a word cloud for the question, “what are the future construction skills that will be more beneficial in an OSC platform?” Word cloud is reviewed in a discussion approach while skills ranking data is analysed using descriptive statistics.\n\n\nFindings\nThe most prominent OSC skills are logistics manager, project manager and digital producer. Attributes of skills that come under construction trades workers, design, engineering and specialist professionals will vary based on onsite-offsite percentage combination in a construction project. Study reviews the required construction skills at two ends of a continuum featuring the trade-based skills; bricklayer, concreter and carpenter at one end (traditional build) and the heavily digitalised and automated skills at the other end (OSC). The noticeable transition towards OSC urges industry practitioners, policy-makers and education providers to focus on understanding and cultivating key OSC skills.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study describes the transition of skills from onsite to OSC. It is presented as one of the earliest attempts to evaluate OSC skill profiles.\n","PeriodicalId":45720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-08-2020-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the existing and emerging Offsite Construction (OSC) skills. Construction industry is inherently labour oriented, fashioning poor labour productivity, low sustainability, slow and costly processes. These shortcomings promote OSC alongside driving forces such as industrialisation, automation and digitalisation. However, the traditional construction skills are not on par with the complexity, where robots, co-bots and digital-driven automated systems create the need for novel OSC skills. Design/methodology/approach Data collection is executed through a Roundtable activity hosting Construction Management academics form Australian universities specialising in construction technology. They engaged in ranking of skills along with creating a word cloud for the question, “what are the future construction skills that will be more beneficial in an OSC platform?” Word cloud is reviewed in a discussion approach while skills ranking data is analysed using descriptive statistics. Findings The most prominent OSC skills are logistics manager, project manager and digital producer. Attributes of skills that come under construction trades workers, design, engineering and specialist professionals will vary based on onsite-offsite percentage combination in a construction project. Study reviews the required construction skills at two ends of a continuum featuring the trade-based skills; bricklayer, concreter and carpenter at one end (traditional build) and the heavily digitalised and automated skills at the other end (OSC). The noticeable transition towards OSC urges industry practitioners, policy-makers and education providers to focus on understanding and cultivating key OSC skills. Originality/value This study describes the transition of skills from onsite to OSC. It is presented as one of the earliest attempts to evaluate OSC skill profiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对非现场施工技能概况的评估
目的本文旨在评估现有和新兴的场外施工(OSC)技能。建筑业本质上是以劳动力为导向的,导致劳动生产率低下、可持续性低、流程缓慢且成本高昂。这些缺点与工业化、自动化和数字化等驱动力一起推动了OSC。然而,传统的施工技能与复杂性不可同日而语,机器人、协作机器人和数字驱动的自动化系统需要新的OSC技能。设计/方法/方法通过圆桌会议活动进行数据收集,圆桌会议由澳大利亚大学专门从事建筑技术的建筑管理学者主持。他们参与了技能排名,并为“在OSC平台中更有益的未来构建技能是什么?”这个问题创建了一个单词云。在讨论方法中对单词云进行了审查,同时使用描述性统计数据对技能排名数据进行了分析。发现最突出的OSC技能是物流经理、项目经理和数字制作人。建筑行业工人、设计、工程和专业人员的技能属性将因建筑项目中现场外百分比组合的不同而有所不同。研究回顾了以贸易技能为特征的连续体两端所需的建筑技能;一端是泥瓦匠、混凝土工和木匠(传统建筑),另一端是高度数字化和自动化的技能(OSC)。向OSC的显著转变促使行业从业者、政策制定者和教育提供者专注于理解和培养OSC的关键技能。独创性/价值本研究描述了技能从现场到OSC的转变。它是评估OSC技能档案的最早尝试之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Managing supply chain disruptions in the construction industry: an institutional approach Assessing risk allocation preferences of partners in international construction joint venture projects in Ghana Impact of time-based delay on public-private partnership (PPP) construction project delivery: construction stakeholders’ perspective Drivers for the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) for post-construction management in the Nigerian AECO industry Risk assessment for 3D printing in construction projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1