The state of global research on poverty after SDG declaration.

Public health challenges Pub Date : 2023-07-17 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1002/puh2.110
Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi, Jimoh Amzat, Lawrence Achilles Nnyanzi
{"title":"The state of global research on poverty after SDG declaration.","authors":"Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi, Jimoh Amzat, Lawrence Achilles Nnyanzi","doi":"10.1002/puh2.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poverty is a significant global problem which can hinder the attainment of the United Nations' (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Poverty reduction or elimination requires adequate scientific or research contributions, creating socio-scientific frames that could inform relevant stakeholders in policy planning, implementation and evaluation. This study aims to review the state of global research on poverty (2016 and upwards), since the UN's declaration of SDGs in 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopted a bibliometric review design. On 31 May 2022, a systematic SCOPUS-based search was conducted to retrieve all journal papers published on poverty (2016 till 31 May 2022). The bibliometric data of the retrieved papers were analysed using Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer software.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 15,143 journal papers on poverty were retrieved, of which 91.2% were published in English, whereas slightly more than half (52.9%) were published in the social sciences. Although all regions of the world sourced journal papers on poverty, however, countries from the Global North, particularly the USA and the United Kingdom, dominated other countries in terms of authorship, funding and institutional affiliations. Among Global South countries, China leads in terms of authorship, funding and institutional affiliations. South America and Africa contributed the smallest volume of journal papers on poverty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There exist global inequalities in research productivity on poverty. The global poverty problem skews to the Global South, but the scientific contributions flow from the Global North. There is a need to narrow the existing inequality gaps in the research productivity on poverty through North-South synergetic research collaborations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":" ","pages":"e110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poverty is a significant global problem which can hinder the attainment of the United Nations' (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Poverty reduction or elimination requires adequate scientific or research contributions, creating socio-scientific frames that could inform relevant stakeholders in policy planning, implementation and evaluation. This study aims to review the state of global research on poverty (2016 and upwards), since the UN's declaration of SDGs in 2015.

Methods: This study adopted a bibliometric review design. On 31 May 2022, a systematic SCOPUS-based search was conducted to retrieve all journal papers published on poverty (2016 till 31 May 2022). The bibliometric data of the retrieved papers were analysed using Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer software.

Result: A total of 15,143 journal papers on poverty were retrieved, of which 91.2% were published in English, whereas slightly more than half (52.9%) were published in the social sciences. Although all regions of the world sourced journal papers on poverty, however, countries from the Global North, particularly the USA and the United Kingdom, dominated other countries in terms of authorship, funding and institutional affiliations. Among Global South countries, China leads in terms of authorship, funding and institutional affiliations. South America and Africa contributed the smallest volume of journal papers on poverty.

Conclusion: There exist global inequalities in research productivity on poverty. The global poverty problem skews to the Global South, but the scientific contributions flow from the Global North. There is a need to narrow the existing inequality gaps in the research productivity on poverty through North-South synergetic research collaborations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续发展目标宣布后全球贫困研究现状
背景:贫困是一个严重的全球性问题,它可能会阻碍联合国可持续发展目标的实现。减少或消除贫困需要充分的科学或研究贡献,建立社会科学框架,为政策规划、执行和评价的相关利益攸关方提供信息。本研究旨在回顾自2015年联合国宣布可持续发展目标以来(2016年及以后)全球贫困研究的现状。方法:本研究采用文献计量学回顾设计。2022年5月31日,基于scope的系统检索检索了2016年至2022年5月31日期间发表的所有关于贫困的期刊论文。采用Microsoft Excel和VOSviewer软件对所检索论文的文献计量学数据进行分析。结果:共检索到有关贫困的期刊论文15143篇,其中英文发表论文占91.2%,社会科学论文占52.9%,略多于一半。尽管世界上所有地区都有关于贫困的期刊论文,但是,全球北方的国家,特别是美国和英国,在作者、资助和机构隶属关系方面主导了其他国家。在全球南方国家中,中国在作者、资助和机构隶属关系方面处于领先地位。南美洲和非洲贡献的关于贫穷的期刊论文数量最少。结论:全球贫困研究生产力存在不平等。全球贫困问题向全球南方倾斜,但科学贡献来自全球北方。有必要通过南北协同研究合作来缩小现有的关于贫困的研究生产力的不平等差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dietary Patterns and Their Association With Body Fat Percentage Among Ready-Made Garment Workers in Dhaka and Chattogram, Bangladesh. Oral Hygiene Practices, Knowledge, and Awareness of Periodontal Disease Among Pregnant Women Visiting the Antenatal Clinic at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Mpox Outbreak in the East Africa Region: Current Status, Containment Measures, Challenges, and Future Direction. Vaping and Tuberculosis: An Overlooked Risk in High-Burden South Asian Countries. Hardware Without Software: Teachers' Cultural Silence and Menstrual Hygiene Management in Rural Bangladeshi Schools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1