Scale-Resolving Hybrid RANS-LES Simulation of a Model Kaplan Turbine on a 400-Million-Element Mesh

IF 1.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.3390/ijtpp8030026
Simon Joßberger, S. Riedelbauch
{"title":"Scale-Resolving Hybrid RANS-LES Simulation of a Model Kaplan Turbine on a 400-Million-Element Mesh","authors":"Simon Joßberger, S. Riedelbauch","doi":"10.3390/ijtpp8030026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Double-regulated Kaplan turbines with adjustable guide vanes and runner blades offer a high degree of flexibility and good efficiency for a wide range of operating points. However, this also leads to a complex geometry and flow guidance with, for example, vortices of different sizes and strengths. The flow in a draft tube is especially challenging to simulate mainly due to flow phenomena, like swirl, separation and strong adverse pressure gradients, and a strong dependency on the upstream flow conditions. Standard simulation approaches with RANS turbulence models, a coarse mesh and large time step size often fail to correctly predict performance and can even lead to wrong tendencies in the overall behavior. To reveal occurring flow phenomena and physical effects, a scale-resolving hybrid RANS-LES simulation on a block structured mesh of about 400 million hexahedral elements of a double-regulated five-blade model Kaplan turbine is carried out. In this paper, first, the results of the ongoing simulation are presented. The major part of the simulation domain is running in LES mode and seems to be properly resolved. The validation of the simulation results with the experimental data shows mean deviations of less than 0.8% in the global results, i.e., total head and power, and a good visual agreement with the three-dimensional PIV measurements of the velocity in the cone and both diffuser channels of the draft tube. In particular, the trend of total head and the results for the draft tube differ significantly between the scale-resolving simulation and a standard RANS simulation. The standard RANS simulation exhibits a highly unsteady behavior of flow, which is not observed in the experiments or scale-resolving simulation.","PeriodicalId":36626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp8030026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Double-regulated Kaplan turbines with adjustable guide vanes and runner blades offer a high degree of flexibility and good efficiency for a wide range of operating points. However, this also leads to a complex geometry and flow guidance with, for example, vortices of different sizes and strengths. The flow in a draft tube is especially challenging to simulate mainly due to flow phenomena, like swirl, separation and strong adverse pressure gradients, and a strong dependency on the upstream flow conditions. Standard simulation approaches with RANS turbulence models, a coarse mesh and large time step size often fail to correctly predict performance and can even lead to wrong tendencies in the overall behavior. To reveal occurring flow phenomena and physical effects, a scale-resolving hybrid RANS-LES simulation on a block structured mesh of about 400 million hexahedral elements of a double-regulated five-blade model Kaplan turbine is carried out. In this paper, first, the results of the ongoing simulation are presented. The major part of the simulation domain is running in LES mode and seems to be properly resolved. The validation of the simulation results with the experimental data shows mean deviations of less than 0.8% in the global results, i.e., total head and power, and a good visual agreement with the three-dimensional PIV measurements of the velocity in the cone and both diffuser channels of the draft tube. In particular, the trend of total head and the results for the draft tube differ significantly between the scale-resolving simulation and a standard RANS simulation. The standard RANS simulation exhibits a highly unsteady behavior of flow, which is not observed in the experiments or scale-resolving simulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4亿元网格上轴流转桨式水轮机模型的比例分辨混合RANS-LES仿真
具有可调节导叶和转轮叶片的双调节卡普兰式涡轮机具有高度的灵活性和良好的效率,适用于各种操作点。然而,这也导致了复杂的几何形状和流动引导,例如,不同大小和强度的涡流。尾水管中的流动特别难以模拟,主要是由于流动现象,如涡流、分离和强烈的反向压力梯度,以及对上游流动条件的强烈依赖性。RANS湍流模型、粗糙网格和大时间步长的标准模拟方法往往无法正确预测性能,甚至可能导致整体行为的错误趋势。为了揭示发生的流动现象和物理效应,在双调节五叶桨式水轮机模型的约4亿个六面体单元的块体结构网格上进行了尺度分辨混合RANS-LES模拟。本文首先给出了正在进行的仿真结果。仿真领域的主要部分是在LES模式下运行,并且似乎得到了适当的解决。模拟结果与实验数据的验证表明,总体结果(即总水头和功率)的平均偏差小于0.8%,并且与尾水管锥体和两个扩压器通道中速度的三维PIV测量结果具有良好的视觉一致性。特别是,在标度分辨模拟和标准RANS模拟之间,尾水管的总水头趋势和结果存在显著差异。标准RANS模拟显示出高度不稳定的流动行为,这在实验或尺度分辨模拟中没有观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Turbofan Performance Estimation Using Neural Network Component Maps and Genetic Algorithm-Least Squares Solvers Experimental Investigation of an Efficient and Lightweight Designed Counter-Rotating Shrouded Fan Stage Experimental Investigation of the Sensitivity of Forced Response to Cold Streaks in an Axial Turbine Heat Load Development and Heat Map Sensitivity Analysis for Civil Aero-Engines Numerical Investigation of Forced Response in a Transonic Compressor Stage—Highlighting Challenges Using Experimental Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1