An Expert Elicitation of Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy in Kenya

IF 0.8 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Challenges in Sustainability Pub Date : 2019-09-03 DOI:10.12924/cis2019.07010030
B. Zwaan, F. D. Longa, Helena de Boer, F. X. Johnson, O. Johnson, M. V. Klaveren, J. Mastop, M. Ogeya, Mariëlle Rietkerk, K. Straver, H. Wanjiru
{"title":"An Expert Elicitation of Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy in Kenya","authors":"B. Zwaan, F. D. Longa, Helena de Boer, F. X. Johnson, O. Johnson, M. V. Klaveren, J. Mastop, M. Ogeya, Mariëlle Rietkerk, K. Straver, H. Wanjiru","doi":"10.12924/cis2019.07010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports evidence for substantial public support for the large-scale deployment of three renewable energy options in Kenya: Wind, solar PV, and geothermal energy. With these renewable technologies, the government of Kenya could make a large contribution to reaching its national commitment under the Paris Agreement. Prices, infrastructural needs, and land-use requirements importantly contribute to shaping public opinion about these renewable energy alternatives, in different ways and directions for wind, PV, and geothermal energy. While overall the evaluation of these technologies is positive, public authorities should be wary of the possible inconveniences and drawbacks associated with them. Anticipating and, where possible, mitigating these shortcomings in national climate and energy development plans could preclude some of them becoming possible hindrances for broad-scale adoption of wind, PV, and geothermal energy. Furthering quantitative public acceptance studies, like the one presented here based on (semi-)expert elicitation and information-choice questionnaires, can assist in Kenya fully reaching its national climate and energy ambitions. More generally, we argue that the establishment of affordable, clean, and secure energy systems, as well as the mitigation of global climate change, can benefit from stakeholder engagement and public survey analysis like the one performed in our study—in developing countries as much as in the developed part of the world.","PeriodicalId":9944,"journal":{"name":"Challenges in Sustainability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenges in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/cis2019.07010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article reports evidence for substantial public support for the large-scale deployment of three renewable energy options in Kenya: Wind, solar PV, and geothermal energy. With these renewable technologies, the government of Kenya could make a large contribution to reaching its national commitment under the Paris Agreement. Prices, infrastructural needs, and land-use requirements importantly contribute to shaping public opinion about these renewable energy alternatives, in different ways and directions for wind, PV, and geothermal energy. While overall the evaluation of these technologies is positive, public authorities should be wary of the possible inconveniences and drawbacks associated with them. Anticipating and, where possible, mitigating these shortcomings in national climate and energy development plans could preclude some of them becoming possible hindrances for broad-scale adoption of wind, PV, and geothermal energy. Furthering quantitative public acceptance studies, like the one presented here based on (semi-)expert elicitation and information-choice questionnaires, can assist in Kenya fully reaching its national climate and energy ambitions. More generally, we argue that the establishment of affordable, clean, and secure energy systems, as well as the mitigation of global climate change, can benefit from stakeholder engagement and public survey analysis like the one performed in our study—in developing countries as much as in the developed part of the world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚公众对可再生能源接受程度的专家评选
本文报告了大量公众支持在肯尼亚大规模部署三种可再生能源的证据:风能、太阳能光伏和地热能。有了这些可再生技术,肯尼亚政府可以为实现其在《巴黎协定》下的国家承诺做出巨大贡献。价格、基础设施需求和土地使用要求在很大程度上影响了公众对风能、光伏和地热能等可再生能源替代品的看法。虽然对这些技术的总体评价是积极的,但公共当局应该警惕与之相关的可能的不便和缺点。在国家气候和能源发展计划中预测并在可能的情况下减轻这些缺点,可以防止其中一些缺点成为大规模采用风能、光伏和地热能的可能障碍。进一步开展定量的公众接受度研究,就像这里展示的基于(半)专家启发和信息选择问卷的研究,可以帮助肯尼亚全面实现其国家气候和能源目标。更广泛地说,我们认为,建立负担得起的、清洁的和安全的能源系统,以及减缓全球气候变化,可以从利益相关者的参与和公众调查分析中受益,就像我们在研究中所做的那样——在发展中国家和发达国家都是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Challenges in Sustainability
Challenges in Sustainability GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Complete Act: Conservatism, Distributism and the Pattern Language for Sustainability Creating a Stakeholder Table, Identifying Hidden Stakeholders, and Exploring Relational Interventions for the Bayano Region of Panama When the Sun Sets on Net Metering: How the Cancellation of Net Metering Impacted the Potential Adoption of Residential Rooftop Solar Photovoltaics in Regina, Saskatchewan The Criticality of Using Frameworks Designed by Consensus (FDC) to Identify and Select Criteria and Indicators to Assess Sustainability Performance of Cities and Communities Evaluating the Effectiveness of Commercially Developed Appraisal Instruments (CDAIs) Using Composite Indices to Assess, Compare, and Rank the Liveability, Quality of Living and Sustainability Performance of Cities and Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1