The Routinization of Media Events: Televised Sports in the Era of Mega-TV

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Television & New Media Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1177/15274764221080989
Ilan Tamir, S. Lehman-Wilzig
{"title":"The Routinization of Media Events: Televised Sports in the Era of Mega-TV","authors":"Ilan Tamir, S. Lehman-Wilzig","doi":"10.1177/15274764221080989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Media events theory, developed by Katz and Dayan in the 1990s, has become one of the most well-known and cited theories in communications research, well-aligned with television’s central role in social life at the time. However, three decades since, in which events have spilled over to other media spaces thereby reshaping the theory’s underlying concept, sports broadcasts have remained a consistently stable source of media events. Although the original theory addressed media events as a rare phenomenon of a distinct, well-defined nature, the current study describes sports events that globally now constitute a sequence of routine mega media events that effectively function as a key anchor in traditional television programing. In the era of multiple screens, content abundance, and flexible viewing times, media events have become classic linear television’s programing core—instrumental in retaining its viewer base and in exploiting television’s advantage over rival screens and content. As a result, sport has become television’s main resource, thus indicating a need to revise elements of media theory. This study suggests several revision possibilities and what they entail methodologically for researchers.","PeriodicalId":51551,"journal":{"name":"Television & New Media","volume":"24 1","pages":"106 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Television & New Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221080989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Media events theory, developed by Katz and Dayan in the 1990s, has become one of the most well-known and cited theories in communications research, well-aligned with television’s central role in social life at the time. However, three decades since, in which events have spilled over to other media spaces thereby reshaping the theory’s underlying concept, sports broadcasts have remained a consistently stable source of media events. Although the original theory addressed media events as a rare phenomenon of a distinct, well-defined nature, the current study describes sports events that globally now constitute a sequence of routine mega media events that effectively function as a key anchor in traditional television programing. In the era of multiple screens, content abundance, and flexible viewing times, media events have become classic linear television’s programing core—instrumental in retaining its viewer base and in exploiting television’s advantage over rival screens and content. As a result, sport has become television’s main resource, thus indicating a need to revise elements of media theory. This study suggests several revision possibilities and what they entail methodologically for researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体事件的常规化:超级电视时代的电视体育
由Katz和Dayan在20世纪90年代发展起来的媒体事件理论,已经成为传播研究中最知名和最被引用的理论之一,与当时电视在社会生活中的核心作用非常吻合。然而,三十年来,随着事件蔓延到其他媒体空间,从而重塑了该理论的基本概念,体育广播一直是媒体事件的稳定来源。尽管最初的理论将媒体事件视为一种罕见的、具有独特、明确性质的现象,但目前的研究将体育事件描述为全球范围内的一系列常规大型媒体事件,这些事件实际上是传统电视节目的关键锚定。在多屏幕、内容丰富和观看时间灵活的时代,媒体事件已成为经典线性电视的节目核心,有助于保留观众基础,并利用电视相对于竞争对手屏幕和内容的优势。因此,体育已经成为电视的主要资源,因此表明需要修改媒体理论的元素。这项研究提出了几种修正的可能性,以及它们对研究人员的方法学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Television & New Media explores the field of television studies, focusing on audience ethnography, public policy, political economy, cultural history, and textual analysis. Special topics covered include digitalization, active audiences, cable and satellite issues, pedagogy, interdisciplinary matters, and globalization, as well as race, gender, and class issues.
期刊最新文献
Ideology as/of Platform Affordance and Black Feminist Conceptualizations of “Canceling”: Reading Twitter Calling out Feminists: Antifeminist Hijacking of Cancel Culture in South Korea The Platformisation of Cancel Culture “Alex, DO NOT BACKPEDAL ON SANDY HOOK!”: Reactionary Fandom, Cancel Culture, and the Possibility of ‘Audience Capture’ on YouTube Cancel Culture and Trigger-Ready Fragmented Interest Groups: The Case of Depp Versus Amber Heard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1