Privacy-preserving FairSwap: Fairness and privacy interplay

S. Avizheh, Preston Haffey, R. Safavi-Naini
{"title":"Privacy-preserving FairSwap: Fairness and privacy interplay","authors":"S. Avizheh, Preston Haffey, R. Safavi-Naini","doi":"10.2478/popets-2022-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fair exchange protocols are among the most important cryptographic primitives in electronic commerce. A basic fair exchange protocol requires that two parties who want to exchange their digital items either receive what they have been promised, or lose nothing. Privacy of fair exchange requires that no one else (other than the two parties) learns anything about the items. Fairness and privacy have been considered as two distinct properties of an exchange protocol. In this paper, we show that subtle ways of leaking the exchange item to the third parties affect fairness in fair exchange protocols when the item is confidential. Our focus is on Fair-Swap, a recently proposed fair exchange protocol that uses a smart contract for dispute resolution, has proven security in UC (Universal Composability) framework, and provides privacy when both parties are honest. We demonstrate, however, that FairSwap’s dispute resolution protocol leaks information to the public and this leakage provides opportunities for the dishonest parties to influence the protocol’s fairness guarantee. We then propose an efficient privacy-enhanced version of Fair-Swap, prove its security and give an implementation and performance evaluation of our proposed system. Our privacy enhancement uses circuit randomization, and we prove its security and privacy in an extension of universal composability model for non-monolithic adversaries that would be of independent interest.","PeriodicalId":74556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2022-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Fair exchange protocols are among the most important cryptographic primitives in electronic commerce. A basic fair exchange protocol requires that two parties who want to exchange their digital items either receive what they have been promised, or lose nothing. Privacy of fair exchange requires that no one else (other than the two parties) learns anything about the items. Fairness and privacy have been considered as two distinct properties of an exchange protocol. In this paper, we show that subtle ways of leaking the exchange item to the third parties affect fairness in fair exchange protocols when the item is confidential. Our focus is on Fair-Swap, a recently proposed fair exchange protocol that uses a smart contract for dispute resolution, has proven security in UC (Universal Composability) framework, and provides privacy when both parties are honest. We demonstrate, however, that FairSwap’s dispute resolution protocol leaks information to the public and this leakage provides opportunities for the dishonest parties to influence the protocol’s fairness guarantee. We then propose an efficient privacy-enhanced version of Fair-Swap, prove its security and give an implementation and performance evaluation of our proposed system. Our privacy enhancement uses circuit randomization, and we prove its security and privacy in an extension of universal composability model for non-monolithic adversaries that would be of independent interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私保护公平交换:公平与隐私的相互作用
摘要公平交换协议是电子商务中最重要的密码原语之一。一个基本的公平交换协议要求,想要交换数字物品的双方要么收到承诺,要么什么都不损失。公平交换的隐私要求任何其他人(双方除外)都不了解有关物品的任何信息。公平性和隐私性被认为是交换协议的两个不同性质。在本文中,我们证明了当交换项目是保密的时,将交换项目泄露给第三方的微妙方式会影响公平交换协议的公平性。我们的重点是公平交换,这是一种最近提出的公平交换协议,使用智能合约解决争议,在UC(通用可组合性)框架中证明了安全性,并在双方诚实的情况下提供隐私。然而,我们证明,FairSwap的争议解决协议向公众泄露了信息,这种泄露为不诚实的各方提供了影响协议公平保障的机会。然后,我们提出了一个有效的公平交换隐私增强版本,证明了它的安全性,并对我们提出的系统进行了实现和性能评估。我们的隐私增强使用电路随机化,我们在非单片对手的通用可组合性模型的扩展中证明了它的安全性和隐私性,这将是独立的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editors' Introduction Compact and Divisible E-Cash with Threshold Issuance On the Robustness of Topics API to a Re-Identification Attack DP-SIPS: A simpler, more scalable mechanism for differentially private partition selection Privacy-Preserving Federated Recurrent Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1