Aspirational Histories of Third World Cosmopolitanism: Dialectical Interactions in Afro-Chinese Beijing

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Signs and Society Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1086/704011
Jay Ke‐Schutte
{"title":"Aspirational Histories of Third World Cosmopolitanism: Dialectical Interactions in Afro-Chinese Beijing","authors":"Jay Ke‐Schutte","doi":"10.1086/704011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article follows four years of ethnographic research in Beijing and investigates tropes of “third world solidarity” (termed disanshijie datuanjie 第三世界大团结) and “cosmopolitanism” as they are pragmatically recruited or intersubjectively evoked in urban Afro-Chinese interactions. In it, I demonstrate how historical tensions between cosmopolitanism and “third worldism” are mediated through the translation of the intersubjective cultural concepts guanxi (关系) and Ubuntu. I ask: How do semiotic horizons of “history” and “culture” become pragmatically indispensable activities through which contemporary Chinese and African subjects establish historical or culturally intelligible grounds for a “novel” interaction under current conditions of South-South educational migrancy? Drawing on a genealogy of pragmatist semiotics and symbolic interactionism (Goffman 1983; Agha 2007; Carr 2011), read through a critical theoretical lens (Fanon 1965; Lukács 2010), I reveal a dialectics of interaction at play in the mediation of historical and cultural dynamics in Afro-Chinese encounters in Beijing. In doing so, this article explores a tension that emerges at the juxtaposition of third world solidarity and cosmopolitan aspiration, one—as I will show—that certainly informs what will come to be among the most pivotal interactions of the twenty-first century: that between China and Africa.","PeriodicalId":51908,"journal":{"name":"Signs and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/704011","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/704011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article follows four years of ethnographic research in Beijing and investigates tropes of “third world solidarity” (termed disanshijie datuanjie 第三世界大团结) and “cosmopolitanism” as they are pragmatically recruited or intersubjectively evoked in urban Afro-Chinese interactions. In it, I demonstrate how historical tensions between cosmopolitanism and “third worldism” are mediated through the translation of the intersubjective cultural concepts guanxi (关系) and Ubuntu. I ask: How do semiotic horizons of “history” and “culture” become pragmatically indispensable activities through which contemporary Chinese and African subjects establish historical or culturally intelligible grounds for a “novel” interaction under current conditions of South-South educational migrancy? Drawing on a genealogy of pragmatist semiotics and symbolic interactionism (Goffman 1983; Agha 2007; Carr 2011), read through a critical theoretical lens (Fanon 1965; Lukács 2010), I reveal a dialectics of interaction at play in the mediation of historical and cultural dynamics in Afro-Chinese encounters in Beijing. In doing so, this article explores a tension that emerges at the juxtaposition of third world solidarity and cosmopolitan aspiration, one—as I will show—that certainly informs what will come to be among the most pivotal interactions of the twenty-first century: that between China and Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三世界世界主义的抱负史:非裔华人北京的辩证互动
本文在北京进行了四年的民族志研究,并考察了“第三世界团结”的比喻第三世界大团结) 以及“世界主义”,因为它们是在城市非裔华人互动中被务实地招募或主体间唤起的。在这本书中,我展示了世界主义和“第三世界主义”之间的历史张力是如何通过翻译主体间的文化概念关系来调节的(关系) 和Ubuntu。我问:在当前的南南教育迁移条件下,“历史”和“文化”的符号学视野如何成为当代中非学科在实践上不可或缺的活动,通过这些活动为“新颖”的互动奠定历史或文化上可理解的基础?根据实用主义符号学和符号互动主义的谱系(Goffman 1983;Agha 2007;Carr 2011),通过批判性理论视角阅读(Fanon 1965;Lukács 2010),我揭示了互动的辩证法在北京非裔华人遭遇的历史和文化动态的中介中发挥作用。在这样做的过程中,这篇文章探讨了第三世界团结和国际化愿望并存时出现的紧张关系,正如我将要展示的那样,这种紧张关系肯定会影响21世纪最关键的互动之一:中国和非洲之间的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signs and Society
Signs and Society Multiple-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
From Transcendence to Kitsch: Have We Lost Faith? Enregistering Grammatical Gender: Indexing Brabantishness through Languagecultural Practices in Digital Tiles Signs of Solidarity and Difference: Kaçak Tea, Samimiyet, and the National Public in Turkey An Unheard Voice: The Paintings of Zohar Tal Inbar, a Mother Looking at Her Soldier Son The Enregisterment of Luxembourgish Standards in the Nineteenth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1