VII. Poland: Nato's Front Line State

Q4 Social Sciences Whitehall Papers Pub Date : 2018-05-04 DOI:10.1080/02681307.2018.1508966
M. Zaborowski
{"title":"VII. Poland: Nato's Front Line State","authors":"M. Zaborowski","doi":"10.1080/02681307.2018.1508966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Poland approaches its twentieth anniversary as a member of NATO, the sense of insecurity at the Alliance’s eastern flank is growing. When Poland joined the Alliance in 1999, the dominant perception was that NATO would provide Poland with full security guarantees. Over subsequent years, as NATO focused on out-of-area missions, Poland was determined to demonstrate to its Western allies that it could act as a security provider. However, since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Poland has led the argument in favour of boosting the Alliance’s presence on its eastern flank. Decisions taken at the NATO Warsaw Summit in 2016 went some way to meeting these expectations, but fell short of providing the eastern flank with adequate deterrence. The war in Ukraine has put Poland back into its historical geopolitical dilemma as a state in an unstable security environment and lacking meaningful natural borders to hamper a large-scale conventional invasion. Poland’s sovereign statehood, built around the principle of rejoining the West, may be directly threatened as the result of Russia’s actions in Ukraine, the expansion of Russian nuclear capabilities in the Kaliningrad exclave that directly borders Poland, and the increase in military incidents in the air and waters of Northern Europe. In essence, this means that Poland has again become a front line state, which certainly narrows its diplomatic options, although its relative importance for the West could grow. As Russia’s military build-up in Kaliningrad and its aggressive exercises (which include simulated nuclear attacks on Warsaw) intensify, Poland will naturally prioritise its own security and the security of its nearest allies, particularly in the Baltic. While over the last ten to fifteen years, Warsaw was expected to show its commitment to making a mark beyond its immediate neighbourhood –","PeriodicalId":37791,"journal":{"name":"Whitehall Papers","volume":"93 1","pages":"88 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02681307.2018.1508966","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehall Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2018.1508966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As Poland approaches its twentieth anniversary as a member of NATO, the sense of insecurity at the Alliance’s eastern flank is growing. When Poland joined the Alliance in 1999, the dominant perception was that NATO would provide Poland with full security guarantees. Over subsequent years, as NATO focused on out-of-area missions, Poland was determined to demonstrate to its Western allies that it could act as a security provider. However, since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Poland has led the argument in favour of boosting the Alliance’s presence on its eastern flank. Decisions taken at the NATO Warsaw Summit in 2016 went some way to meeting these expectations, but fell short of providing the eastern flank with adequate deterrence. The war in Ukraine has put Poland back into its historical geopolitical dilemma as a state in an unstable security environment and lacking meaningful natural borders to hamper a large-scale conventional invasion. Poland’s sovereign statehood, built around the principle of rejoining the West, may be directly threatened as the result of Russia’s actions in Ukraine, the expansion of Russian nuclear capabilities in the Kaliningrad exclave that directly borders Poland, and the increase in military incidents in the air and waters of Northern Europe. In essence, this means that Poland has again become a front line state, which certainly narrows its diplomatic options, although its relative importance for the West could grow. As Russia’s military build-up in Kaliningrad and its aggressive exercises (which include simulated nuclear attacks on Warsaw) intensify, Poland will naturally prioritise its own security and the security of its nearest allies, particularly in the Baltic. While over the last ten to fifteen years, Warsaw was expected to show its commitment to making a mark beyond its immediate neighbourhood –
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
7波兰:北约的前线国家
随着波兰加入北约20周年的临近,北约东翼的不安全感正在增加。1999年波兰加入北约时,主流的看法是北约将为波兰提供全面的安全保障。在随后的几年里,随着北约专注于域外任务,波兰决心向其西方盟友证明,它可以充当安全提供者。然而,自从俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以来,波兰一直带头主张加强北约在其东翼的存在。2016年北约华沙峰会上做出的决定在一定程度上满足了这些期望,但未能为东翼提供足够的威慑。乌克兰战争使波兰重新陷入历史上的地缘政治困境:一个安全环境不稳定的国家,缺乏有效的自然边界来阻止大规模的常规入侵。波兰的主权国家地位是建立在重新加入西方的原则基础上的,俄罗斯在乌克兰的行动、俄罗斯在与波兰直接接壤的加里宁格勒飞地的核能力扩张,以及北欧空中和水域军事事件的增加,可能会直接威胁到波兰的主权国家地位。从本质上讲,这意味着波兰再次成为前线国家,这无疑缩小了它的外交选择,尽管它对西方的相对重要性可能会增加。随着俄罗斯在加里宁格勒的军事集结和侵略演习(包括模拟对华沙的核攻击)的加强,波兰自然会优先考虑自己的安全和最亲密盟友的安全,尤其是在波罗的海。而在过去的10到15年里,华沙被期望展示其在其近邻之外留下印记的承诺
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Whitehall Papers
Whitehall Papers Social Sciences-Archeology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Whitehall Paper series provides in-depth studies of specific developments, issues or themes in the field of national and international defence and security. Published three times a year, Whitehall Papers reflect the highest standards of original research and analysis, and are invaluable background material for policy-makers and specialists alike.
期刊最新文献
Revision Surgery With Refixation After Mandibular Fractures. High-Order Language Processing Difficulties in Patients With Schizophrenia: Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Results From the Hindi Version of a Newly Developed Language Test. Chapter III: Russian and NATO Surface Capabilities in the High North Chapter I: The Strategic Context Appendix 2: Submarine ASW Interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1