Characteristics of pain–related factors in subgroups based on central sensitivity syndromes and pain in musculoskeletal pain patients: a cluster analysis

Pain Research Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.35.133
H. Shigetoh, Yoichi Tanaka, Masayuki Koga, M. Osumi, S. Morioka
{"title":"Characteristics of pain–related factors in subgroups based on central sensitivity syndromes and pain in musculoskeletal pain patients: a cluster analysis","authors":"H. Shigetoh, Yoichi Tanaka, Masayuki Koga, M. Osumi, S. Morioka","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.35.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central sensitization (CS) and psychological factors are associated with pain intensity. However, it has remained unclear whether the effects of central sensitivity syndromes and cognitive ⁄ emotional factors differ depending on the severity of pain and the pain quality. Our purposes were to perform subgrouping based on central sensitivity syndromes and pain intensity, and to clarify the difference in central sensitization syndrome and pain intensity between subgroups. Fifty–nine patients with musculoskeletal pain were included in this cross– sectional study. Pain intensity and psychological problems were assessed with Central sensitization inventory (CSI–9), Short–Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SFMPQ2), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS–4). The cluster analysis with a ward method was used to divide patients into subgroups based on central sensitization syndrome and pain intensity. In addition, Kruskal–Wallis test, multiple comparison (Bonferroni method), and Fisher’s exact test were performed to compare clinical outcomes between subgroups. The level of significance was set at 5%. The cluster analysis classified into three subgroups. One subgroup of patients (n=11) was characterized by high level of central sensitivity syndromes, pain intensity and psychological problems. A second subgroup (n=19) was characterized by low level of central sensitivity syndromes, moderate level of pain intensity, high level of psychological problems. The third subgroup (n=29) was characterized by low level of central sensitivity syndromes, pain intensity and psychological problems. That is, one subgroup was mainly affected with central sensitivity syndromes, and another subgroup was affected psychological factors. These results indicated the differences in pain mechanism among subgroups.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.35.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central sensitization (CS) and psychological factors are associated with pain intensity. However, it has remained unclear whether the effects of central sensitivity syndromes and cognitive ⁄ emotional factors differ depending on the severity of pain and the pain quality. Our purposes were to perform subgrouping based on central sensitivity syndromes and pain intensity, and to clarify the difference in central sensitization syndrome and pain intensity between subgroups. Fifty–nine patients with musculoskeletal pain were included in this cross– sectional study. Pain intensity and psychological problems were assessed with Central sensitization inventory (CSI–9), Short–Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SFMPQ2), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS–4). The cluster analysis with a ward method was used to divide patients into subgroups based on central sensitization syndrome and pain intensity. In addition, Kruskal–Wallis test, multiple comparison (Bonferroni method), and Fisher’s exact test were performed to compare clinical outcomes between subgroups. The level of significance was set at 5%. The cluster analysis classified into three subgroups. One subgroup of patients (n=11) was characterized by high level of central sensitivity syndromes, pain intensity and psychological problems. A second subgroup (n=19) was characterized by low level of central sensitivity syndromes, moderate level of pain intensity, high level of psychological problems. The third subgroup (n=29) was characterized by low level of central sensitivity syndromes, pain intensity and psychological problems. That is, one subgroup was mainly affected with central sensitivity syndromes, and another subgroup was affected psychological factors. These results indicated the differences in pain mechanism among subgroups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于中枢敏感综合征和肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛亚组的疼痛相关因素特征:聚类分析
中枢致敏(CS)和心理因素与疼痛强度有关。然而,目前尚不清楚中枢敏感综合征和认知/情绪因素的影响是否因疼痛的严重程度和疼痛质量而异。我们的目的是根据中枢敏感综合征和疼痛强度进行亚组,并澄清亚组之间中枢敏感综合症和疼痛强度的差异。59名肌肉骨骼疼痛患者被纳入这项横断面研究。使用中心致敏量表(CSI-9)、简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷2(SFMPQ2)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、疼痛灾难量表(PCS-4)评估疼痛强度和心理问题。采用病房法进行聚类分析,根据中枢致敏综合征和疼痛强度将患者分为亚组。此外,还进行了Kruskal–Wallis检验、多重比较(Bonferroni法)和Fisher精确检验,以比较亚组之间的临床结果。显著性水平设定为5%。聚类分析分为三个亚组。一个亚组患者(n=11)的特点是中枢敏感综合征、疼痛强度和心理问题高。第二个亚组(n=19)的特征是中枢敏感性综合征水平低,疼痛强度中等,心理问题水平高。第三亚组(n=29)的特点是中枢敏感性综合征、疼痛强度和心理问题水平低。也就是说,一个亚组主要受中枢敏感性综合征的影响,另一个亚群受心理因素的影响。这些结果表明了亚组之间疼痛机制的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Interaction between dorsal horn neuron subsets operated by a neuropeptide Y and prodynorphin promoter and its contribution to Aβ fiber–induced allodynia–like behavior in rats Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Outcomes of 707 cervical selective nerve root blocks using a fluoroscopy–guided posterolateral oblique approach Exploratory study of factors affecting quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross–sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1