Incidental neuroimaging findings in South African adult research participants with and without neuropsychiatric disorders

Q4 Neuroscience Neuroimage. Reports Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100130
Chanellé Hendrikse , Tina Malan , Stéfan du Plessis , Jonathan Carr , Martin Kidd , Robin Emsley , Soraya Seedat
{"title":"Incidental neuroimaging findings in South African adult research participants with and without neuropsychiatric disorders","authors":"Chanellé Hendrikse ,&nbsp;Tina Malan ,&nbsp;Stéfan du Plessis ,&nbsp;Jonathan Carr ,&nbsp;Martin Kidd ,&nbsp;Robin Emsley ,&nbsp;Soraya Seedat","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a lack of comparative data on the occurrence and clinical significance of incidental neuroimaging findings (IFs) in adult research participants with neuropsychiatric disorders and healthy controls. We investigated and compared the frequency, clinical significance and predictors of IFs on structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of research participants between the ages of 18–78 years living in Cape Town, South Africa. Our sample (<em>N</em> = 295) included individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (<em>n</em> = 122) or Parkinson's disease (<em>n</em> = 21), and healthy controls (<em>n</em> = 152). T1 ME-MPRAGE weighted structural MRI scans were acquired and subsequently reviewed for IFs by radiologists. A neurologist reviewed radiological reports and categorised IFs according to their estimated clinical significance. IFs were observed on the scans of 95 (32%) participants but most IFs were either judged to be clinically non-significant (49%) or of unknown clinical significance (32%). Eighteen participants (6%) had clinically significant findings that required referral for further clinical management. Age was a significant predictor of having an IF, whereas a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease was a significant predictor of having a clinically significant IF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266695602200054X/pdfft?md5=bb579ff030a08357bae4c916e2b288af&pid=1-s2.0-S266695602200054X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266695602200054X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a lack of comparative data on the occurrence and clinical significance of incidental neuroimaging findings (IFs) in adult research participants with neuropsychiatric disorders and healthy controls. We investigated and compared the frequency, clinical significance and predictors of IFs on structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of research participants between the ages of 18–78 years living in Cape Town, South Africa. Our sample (N = 295) included individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 122) or Parkinson's disease (n = 21), and healthy controls (n = 152). T1 ME-MPRAGE weighted structural MRI scans were acquired and subsequently reviewed for IFs by radiologists. A neurologist reviewed radiological reports and categorised IFs according to their estimated clinical significance. IFs were observed on the scans of 95 (32%) participants but most IFs were either judged to be clinically non-significant (49%) or of unknown clinical significance (32%). Eighteen participants (6%) had clinically significant findings that required referral for further clinical management. Age was a significant predictor of having an IF, whereas a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease was a significant predictor of having a clinically significant IF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偶然神经影像学发现在南非成人研究参与者有和没有神经精神疾病
关于神经精神疾病和健康对照的成人研究参与者中偶然神经影像学发现(IFs)的发生率和临床意义缺乏比较数据。我们调查并比较了居住在南非开普敦的年龄在18-78岁之间的研究参与者的结构脑磁共振成像(MRI)扫描中IFs的频率、临床意义和预测因素。我们的样本(N = 295)包括创伤后应激障碍(N = 122)或帕金森病患者(N = 21),以及健康对照(N = 152)。获得T1 ME-MPRAGE加权结构MRI扫描,随后由放射科医生检查IFs。一位神经科医生回顾了放射学报告,并根据其估计的临床意义对IFs进行了分类。在95名(32%)参与者的扫描中观察到干扰源,但大多数干扰源要么被判定为临床无显著性(49%),要么被判定为临床意义未知(32%)。18名参与者(6%)有临床显著的发现,需要转诊进一步的临床处理。年龄是IF发生的重要预测因子,而帕金森病的诊断是IF发生的重要预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring cognitive load in multitasking using mobile fNIRS MRI-guided clustering of patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease using self-organizing maps Evaluating state-based network dynamics in anhedonia Unresponsiveness induced by sevoflurane and propofol is associated with reduced basal forebrain cholinergic nuclei functional connectivity in humans, a pilot exploratory study Increased functional connectivity of amygdalar-frontal pathways in patients with alcohol use disorder and childhood trauma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1