Prevalence and predictive factors of elder mistreatment in Chinese migrant families

Q4 Nursing Frontiers of Nursing Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2478/fon-2022-0015
Ye-qing Yang, W. Deoisres, Chintana Wacharasin, Pornchai Jullamate
{"title":"Prevalence and predictive factors of elder mistreatment in Chinese migrant families","authors":"Ye-qing Yang, W. Deoisres, Chintana Wacharasin, Pornchai Jullamate","doi":"10.2478/fon-2022-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To examine the prevalence of and identify the predictive factors for elder mistreatment (EM) in Chinese migrant families. Methods This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 489 rural migrant elderly were recruited using multistage sampling technique from communities in Wenzhou city between June 2020 and October 2020. All participants completed the Mini-Cog, and then data were collected in a survey using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire, Abuser's Dependency Scale, the Friendship Scale (FS), Intergenerational Ambivalence Scale, Filial Piety Index, the Assessment Tool of Domestic Elder Abuse, and a demographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were carried out to analyze the data. Results The prevalences of physical mistreatment, psychological mistreatment, neglect, economic mistreatment, and social mistreatment among the migrant elderly were 1.23%, 20.65%, 22.50%, 0.61%, and 9.41%, respectively. Significant predictive factors were migrant elderlies’ mental health status (β = −0.118, P < 0.01), adult children's filial piety (FP) (β = −0.245, P < 0.001), and intergene rational ambivalence (β = 0.365, P < 0.001). Conclusions EM was common among the migrant elderly. Predictive factors for EM in Chinese migrant families were identified. The findings could be useful in developing nursing interventions to promote migrant elderlies’ mental health, uphold their children's FP, and harmonize intergenerational relationship to avoid EM.","PeriodicalId":52206,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"9 1","pages":"165 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2022-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To examine the prevalence of and identify the predictive factors for elder mistreatment (EM) in Chinese migrant families. Methods This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 489 rural migrant elderly were recruited using multistage sampling technique from communities in Wenzhou city between June 2020 and October 2020. All participants completed the Mini-Cog, and then data were collected in a survey using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire, Abuser's Dependency Scale, the Friendship Scale (FS), Intergenerational Ambivalence Scale, Filial Piety Index, the Assessment Tool of Domestic Elder Abuse, and a demographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were carried out to analyze the data. Results The prevalences of physical mistreatment, psychological mistreatment, neglect, economic mistreatment, and social mistreatment among the migrant elderly were 1.23%, 20.65%, 22.50%, 0.61%, and 9.41%, respectively. Significant predictive factors were migrant elderlies’ mental health status (β = −0.118, P < 0.01), adult children's filial piety (FP) (β = −0.245, P < 0.001), and intergene rational ambivalence (β = 0.365, P < 0.001). Conclusions EM was common among the migrant elderly. Predictive factors for EM in Chinese migrant families were identified. The findings could be useful in developing nursing interventions to promote migrant elderlies’ mental health, uphold their children's FP, and harmonize intergenerational relationship to avoid EM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国流动人口家庭虐待老年人的患病率及预测因素
【摘要】目的调查中国外来务工人员家庭中老年人虐待(EM)的发生率,并确定其预测因素。方法采用横断面研究。采用多阶段抽样方法,于2020年6月至2020年10月在温州市社区共招募了489名农村流动老年人。所有被试均完成Mini-Cog问卷,然后使用12项健康问卷、施虐者依赖量表、友谊量表、代际矛盾心理量表、孝道指数、家庭虐待老人评估工具和人口统计问卷收集数据。采用描述性统计和多元回归对数据进行分析。结果流动老年人身体虐待、心理虐待、忽视、经济虐待和社会虐待的发生率分别为1.23%、20.65%、22.50%、0.61%和9.41%。流动老年人的心理健康状况(β = - 0.118, P < 0.01)、成年子女的孝道(FP) (β = - 0.245, P < 0.001)和基因间理性矛盾心理(β = 0.365, P < 0.001)具有显著预测意义。结论EM在老年流动人口中较为常见。确定中国移民家庭EM的预测因素。研究结果有助于制定护理干预措施,以促进流动老年人的心理健康,维护其子女的FP,并协调代际关系以避免EM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Nursing
Frontiers of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation and achievements of enhanced recovery after surgery program in perioperative management of gastric cancer patients† Impacts of fighting against COVID-19 on critical care nurses’ psychological and physical health: a literature review Investigating adverse events in long-term care facilities: a systematized review Detection and management of perioperative blood glucose abnormalities Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to medication errors among nursing professionals: a questionnaire-based study in a tertiary care hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1