Expanding the legal common good via sustainable urban mobility

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Place Management and Development Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1108/jpmd-08-2022-0069
C. Balsas
{"title":"Expanding the legal common good via sustainable urban mobility","authors":"C. Balsas","doi":"10.1108/jpmd-08-2022-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the 2015 Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) Road World Cycling Championship in Richmond, Virginia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn array of eclectic methods included in situ witness observations of several of the races, 21 semi-structured random interviews and multiple discussions with elements of UCI, the city of Richmond’s planners, residents and business owners during and after the championship in fall 2015.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper has uncovered five findings: First, the material investment was considerably smaller than that of other events (common good criterion CGC i – good governance); second, pre-planning was critical to successfully hosting the event; third, this event included not only two entities as one would expect at first glance, but many (common good criterion CGC ii – good management); fourth, a filière approach to community service and the exploitation of clustered thematic activities was of critical importance to successfully hosting the 2015 UCI Road World Cycling Championship; and fifth, this event enabled the opportunity to market other city and regional assets (common good criterion CGC iii – good outcomes).\n\n\nPractical implications\nCities hoping to bid for events ought to consider hosting unique events such as road championships. Those cities will benefit from careful event pre-planning, responsible event hosting and post-event legacies in the form of socio-economic and mindscape memories.\n\n\nSocial implications\nBidding and pre-event planning is increasingly seen as an opportunity to locate, create and develop support for common good urban projects, which will remain valuable after the event is over or which will need to be built in spite of the bid’s result.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study fills an unresearched gap on the impact of events on a city’s future non-motorized sustainable transportation priorities.\n","PeriodicalId":46966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Place Management and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Place Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-08-2022-0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the 2015 Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) Road World Cycling Championship in Richmond, Virginia. Design/methodology/approach An array of eclectic methods included in situ witness observations of several of the races, 21 semi-structured random interviews and multiple discussions with elements of UCI, the city of Richmond’s planners, residents and business owners during and after the championship in fall 2015. Findings This paper has uncovered five findings: First, the material investment was considerably smaller than that of other events (common good criterion CGC i – good governance); second, pre-planning was critical to successfully hosting the event; third, this event included not only two entities as one would expect at first glance, but many (common good criterion CGC ii – good management); fourth, a filière approach to community service and the exploitation of clustered thematic activities was of critical importance to successfully hosting the 2015 UCI Road World Cycling Championship; and fifth, this event enabled the opportunity to market other city and regional assets (common good criterion CGC iii – good outcomes). Practical implications Cities hoping to bid for events ought to consider hosting unique events such as road championships. Those cities will benefit from careful event pre-planning, responsible event hosting and post-event legacies in the form of socio-economic and mindscape memories. Social implications Bidding and pre-event planning is increasingly seen as an opportunity to locate, create and develop support for common good urban projects, which will remain valuable after the event is over or which will need to be built in spite of the bid’s result. Originality/value This study fills an unresearched gap on the impact of events on a city’s future non-motorized sustainable transportation priorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过可持续的城市流动扩大法律公益
目的本文旨在考察2015年在弗吉尼亚州里士满举行的国际自行车联合会(UCI)公路世界自行车锦标赛。设计/方法论/方法一系列折衷的方法包括对几场比赛的现场见证观察、21次半结构化随机采访,以及在2015年秋季锦标赛期间和之后与UCI、里士满市规划者、居民和企业主进行的多次讨论,物质投资远小于其他事件(共同利益标准CGC i——良好治理);其次,预先规划对于成功举办该活动至关重要;第三,这一事件不仅包括两个实体,而且包括许多实体(通用良好标准CGC ii——良好管理);第四,对社区服务采取细致的方法,利用聚集的主题活动,对于成功举办2015年UCI公路世界自行车锦标赛至关重要;第五,此次活动为营销其他城市和地区资产提供了机会(通用良好标准CGC iii–良好结果)。实际意义希望申办赛事的城市应该考虑举办公路锦标赛等独特的赛事。这些城市将受益于精心的活动前期规划、负责任的活动主办以及以社会经济和心态记忆的形式留下的活动后遗产。社会影响招标和活动前规划越来越被视为一个机会,可以定位、创建和发展对公共良好城市项目的支持,这些项目在活动结束后仍将具有价值,或者无论招标结果如何,都需要建造。原创性/价值这项研究填补了一个未经研究的空白,即事件对城市未来非机动可持续交通优先事项的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Place Management and Development
Journal of Place Management and Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Exploring the drivers of residents’ identification and green citizenship behavior in green cities: a multicountry study Street art and place-making of villages: examples of Italian painted villages Conceptualising place branding in three approaches: towards a new definition of place brands as embodied experiences Leveraging consumer chronic time pressure and time management to improve retail venue outcomes Economic outcomes of place branding: evidence from a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1