Stigma toward individuals with mental illness: validation of the Arabic version of the Attribution Questionnaire in a university student population

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2021-05-07 DOI:10.1108/JPMH-10-2020-0135
B. Saguem, M. Gharmoul, A. Braham, S. B. Nasr, Sang Qin, P. Corrigan
{"title":"Stigma toward individuals with mental illness: validation of the Arabic version of the Attribution Questionnaire in a university student population","authors":"B. Saguem, M. Gharmoul, A. Braham, S. B. Nasr, Sang Qin, P. Corrigan","doi":"10.1108/JPMH-10-2020-0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the attribution questionnaire (AQ).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe AQ is designed to assess attitudes, affects and behavioral intentions related to a hypothetical person diagnosed with schizophrenia. The original English version was translated into Literary Arabic. A total of 310 students registered in different universities, with medical and paramedical establishments excluded completed the Arabic version of AQ. Reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Structural equation modeling was used to test hypothesized paths. Correlations among exogenous (e.g. responsibility) and endogenous (e.g. help) variables in the path were examined. Fit indicators were then examined for equations that were identified.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results revealed that the Arabic version of AQ showed acceptable psychometric properties in the assessment of stigma in the Tunisian population. All factors of this Arabic version showed Cronbach’s alpha values equal to or greater than 0.72. Structural equation models for the responsibility and dangerousness models were mostly supported. The Arabic version of AQ is valid and reliable for the assessment of stigma in Tunisian and Arabic-speaking populations.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe Arabic version of AQ may be used to promote research on stigma toward people with mental illness in larger and more representative Tunisian and Arabic-speaking populations, which will help to further address the complex and multifaceted phenomenon of stigma toward people with mental illness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first validated stigma measure in the Tunisian socio-cultural context.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-10-2020-0135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the attribution questionnaire (AQ). Design/methodology/approach The AQ is designed to assess attitudes, affects and behavioral intentions related to a hypothetical person diagnosed with schizophrenia. The original English version was translated into Literary Arabic. A total of 310 students registered in different universities, with medical and paramedical establishments excluded completed the Arabic version of AQ. Reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Structural equation modeling was used to test hypothesized paths. Correlations among exogenous (e.g. responsibility) and endogenous (e.g. help) variables in the path were examined. Fit indicators were then examined for equations that were identified. Findings The results revealed that the Arabic version of AQ showed acceptable psychometric properties in the assessment of stigma in the Tunisian population. All factors of this Arabic version showed Cronbach’s alpha values equal to or greater than 0.72. Structural equation models for the responsibility and dangerousness models were mostly supported. The Arabic version of AQ is valid and reliable for the assessment of stigma in Tunisian and Arabic-speaking populations. Practical implications The Arabic version of AQ may be used to promote research on stigma toward people with mental illness in larger and more representative Tunisian and Arabic-speaking populations, which will help to further address the complex and multifaceted phenomenon of stigma toward people with mental illness. Originality/value This is the first validated stigma measure in the Tunisian socio-cultural context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对精神疾病患者的羞辱:阿拉伯语版归因问卷在大学生群体中的验证
目的本研究旨在检验阿拉伯版归因问卷(AQ)的可靠性和有效性。设计/方法/方法AQ旨在评估与一名被诊断为精神分裂症的假想患者相关的态度、影响和行为意图。英文原版被翻译成文学阿拉伯语。共有310名在不同大学注册的学生(不包括医疗和辅助医疗机构)完成了阿拉伯语版的AQ。使用Cronbachα系数测试可靠性。结构方程建模用于测试假设路径。考察了路径中外源变量(如责任)和内源变量(如帮助)之间的相关性。然后,针对已确定的方程式,对拟合指标进行检查。结果显示,阿拉伯版本的AQ在评估突尼斯人口的污名时显示出可接受的心理测量特性。该阿拉伯语版本的所有因素显示Cronbach的α值等于或大于0.72。主要支持责任的结构方程模型和危险性模型。阿拉伯版本的AQ在评估突尼斯和阿拉伯语人口的污名方面是有效和可靠的。实际含义阿拉伯版本的AQ可用于在更大、更具代表性的突尼斯和阿拉伯语人群中促进对精神疾病患者污名化的研究,这将有助于进一步解决对精神疾病人群污名化这一复杂而多方面的现象。独创性/价值这是突尼斯社会文化背景下第一个经过验证的污名衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Overcoming challenges of embedding child and youth mental health research in community NHS services Psychological wellbeing and avoidance strategies as moderators between excessive social media use and academic performance among Indian college students Pain and associated functional impairment in the Danish general population: the role of mental well-being Impact of nature on the mental health and well-being of the ICU survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Public mental health and wellbeing interventions delivered by allied health professionals (AHPs): mapping the evidence and identification of gaps. A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1