Nocturnal urine 6-hydroxy sulfate melatonin is associated with the outcome of subjects with sepsis

Wenjie Li, Jiameng Chen, Shuming Pan, Chengjin Gao
{"title":"Nocturnal urine 6-hydroxy sulfate melatonin is associated with the outcome of subjects with sepsis","authors":"Wenjie Li, Jiameng Chen, Shuming Pan, Chengjin Gao","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background It is imperative to identify potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and intervention of severe sepsis. This study investigated the relationship between melatonin secretion and outcome of sepsis after 28-day admission. Methods Patients with sepsis were randomly divided into an eye mask group and a control group. Blood and urine samples were collected from day 0 to 4. Relevant clinical data and 28-day survival data were obtained. Serum melatonin and urine 6-hydroxy sulfate melatonin (6-SMT) levels were measured. Results The outcome of sepsis did not differ between the eye mask and control groups. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were significantly higher and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR), serum melatonin, nocturnal urine 6-SMT, and 24-hour urine 6-SMT levels were significantly lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors. The outcome at day 28 after admission was significantly associated with APACHE II and SOFA scores and mHLA-DR, nocturnal urine 6-SMT, and 24-hour urine 6-SMT levels. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.785, 0.740, 0.774, and 0.858 for APACHE II score, SOFA score, mHLA-DR expression, and nocturnal urine 6-SMT amount, respectively. The optimal thresholds for mHLA-DR and nocturnal urine 6-SMT were 30.13% and 43.60%, respectively. Nocturnal urine 6-SMT level was significantly and positively correlated with mHLA-DR expression. Conclusion Nocturnal urine 6-SMT level may be a feasible biomarker to predict the outcome of patients with sepsis. The use of a night-time eye mask has no significant effect on the outcome of sepsis. Clinical trials This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02304224).","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background It is imperative to identify potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and intervention of severe sepsis. This study investigated the relationship between melatonin secretion and outcome of sepsis after 28-day admission. Methods Patients with sepsis were randomly divided into an eye mask group and a control group. Blood and urine samples were collected from day 0 to 4. Relevant clinical data and 28-day survival data were obtained. Serum melatonin and urine 6-hydroxy sulfate melatonin (6-SMT) levels were measured. Results The outcome of sepsis did not differ between the eye mask and control groups. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were significantly higher and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR), serum melatonin, nocturnal urine 6-SMT, and 24-hour urine 6-SMT levels were significantly lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors. The outcome at day 28 after admission was significantly associated with APACHE II and SOFA scores and mHLA-DR, nocturnal urine 6-SMT, and 24-hour urine 6-SMT levels. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.785, 0.740, 0.774, and 0.858 for APACHE II score, SOFA score, mHLA-DR expression, and nocturnal urine 6-SMT amount, respectively. The optimal thresholds for mHLA-DR and nocturnal urine 6-SMT were 30.13% and 43.60%, respectively. Nocturnal urine 6-SMT level was significantly and positively correlated with mHLA-DR expression. Conclusion Nocturnal urine 6-SMT level may be a feasible biomarker to predict the outcome of patients with sepsis. The use of a night-time eye mask has no significant effect on the outcome of sepsis. Clinical trials This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02304224).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夜间尿6-羟基硫酸褪黑素与脓毒症患者的预后有关
摘要背景识别潜在的生物标志物对严重败血症的早期诊断和干预至关重要。本研究调查了入院28天后褪黑素分泌与败血症预后之间的关系。方法将败血症患者随机分为眼罩组和对照组。从第0天至第4天采集血液和尿液样本。获得相关临床数据和28天生存数据。测定血清褪黑素和尿液6-羟基硫酸盐褪黑素(6-SMT)水平。结果眼罩组和对照组败血症的转归无差异。非幸存者的急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II和顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分显著高于幸存者,单核细胞-人类白细胞抗原DR(mHLA DR)、血清褪黑素、夜间尿液6-SMT和24小时尿液6-SMT水平显著低于幸存者。入院后第28天的结果与APACHE II和SOFA评分、mHLA DR、夜间尿液6-SMT和24小时尿液6-SMT水平显著相关。APACHE II评分、SOFA评分、mHLA DR表达和夜间尿液6-SMT量的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.785、0.740、0.774和0.858。mHLA DR和夜间尿液6-SMT的最佳阈值分别为30.13%和43.60%。夜间尿6-SMT水平与mHLA DR表达呈正相关。结论夜间尿液6-SMT水平可能是预测败血症患者预后的一个可行的生物标志物。使用夜间眼罩对败血症的结果没有显著影响。临床试验本研究已在clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02304224)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of patients with deep sternal wound infection-induced sepsis: a retrospective cohort study Exploring the effects of coronary artery disease as a preexisting comorbidity on mortality in hospitalized septic patients: a retrospective observation study An unusual anterior mitral leaflet perforation in a patient with no infective endocarditis: a case report Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in critically ill patients: does bedside laparoscopy offer any real benefit? Congestive heart failure and sepsis a retrospective study of hospitalization outcomes from a rural hospital in Southwest Missouri: Erratum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1