Higher pulse pressure/stroke volume index is associated with impaired outcome in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy the LIFE study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2017-05-04 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009
C. Mancusi, E. Gerdts, G. de Simone, H. Midtbø, M. T. Lønnebakken, K. Boman, K. Wachtell, B. Dahlöf, R. Devereux
{"title":"Higher pulse pressure/stroke volume index is associated with impaired outcome in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy the LIFE study","authors":"C. Mancusi, E. Gerdts, G. de Simone, H. Midtbø, M. T. Lønnebakken, K. Boman, K. Wachtell, B. Dahlöf, R. Devereux","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We tested the prognostic impact of a marker of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure/stroke volume index (PP/SVi), in patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. We used data from 866 patients randomized to losartan or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment, over a median of 4.8 years, in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. The association of PP/SVi with outcomes was tested in Cox regression analyses and reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In multivariate regression, reduction of PP/SVi was independently associated with male gender, reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) and relative wall thickness and with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < .05). After adjusting for confounders, higher baseline PP/SVi predicted a 38% higher hazard of combined major fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (95% CI 1.04–1.84), and higher hazard of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59–3.48) and stroke (HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06–1.99) (all p < .05). Higher PP/SVi also predicts higher rate of hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48–3.12) and a 52% higher hazard of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.10–2.09) (both p < .05). In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, higher PP/SVi was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":55591,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":"26 1","pages":"150 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract We tested the prognostic impact of a marker of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure/stroke volume index (PP/SVi), in patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. We used data from 866 patients randomized to losartan or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment, over a median of 4.8 years, in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. The association of PP/SVi with outcomes was tested in Cox regression analyses and reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In multivariate regression, reduction of PP/SVi was independently associated with male gender, reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) and relative wall thickness and with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < .05). After adjusting for confounders, higher baseline PP/SVi predicted a 38% higher hazard of combined major fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (95% CI 1.04–1.84), and higher hazard of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59–3.48) and stroke (HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06–1.99) (all p < .05). Higher PP/SVi also predicts higher rate of hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48–3.12) and a 52% higher hazard of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.10–2.09) (both p < .05). In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, higher PP/SVi was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高脉压/卒中容量指数与左心室肥厚高血压患者预后受损相关
摘要:我们测试了动脉硬度指标脉压/脑卒中容积指数(PP/SVi)对高血压和左心室肥厚患者预后的影响。在氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点(LIFE)研究中,我们使用了866名随机接受氯沙坦或阿替洛尔为基础的抗高血压治疗的患者的数据,中位时间为4.8年。在Cox回归分析中检验了PP/SVi与结果的关联,并以风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。在多元回归中,PP/SVi的降低与男性、收缩压(BP)和相对壁厚的降低以及左心室射血分数的增加独立相关(均p < 0.05)。在调整混杂因素后,较高的基线PP/SVi预测合并主要致命性和非致命性心血管事件的风险增加38% (95% CI 1.04-1.84),心血管死亡率(HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59-3.48)和卒中(HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06-1.99)的风险增加(均p < 0.05)。较高的PP/SVi也预示着较高的HF住院率(HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48-3.12)和高52%的全因死亡风险(95% CI 1.10-2.09) (p均< 0.05)。在伴有心电图左室肥厚的高血压患者中,较高的PP/SVi与心血管发病率和死亡率增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified. Coffee and blood pressure: exciting news! Accuracy of home blood pressure measurement: the ACCURAPRESS study - a proposal of Young Investigator Group of the Italian Hypertension Society (Società Italiana dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa). Blood pressure response to close or loose contact between physician and patient during attended office blood pressure measurement. Psychological determinants of drug adherence and severity of hypertension in patients with apparently treatment-resistant vs. controlled hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1