Economic impacts of avian influenza disease control strategies in the USA due to Texas outbreaks

Jianhong E. Mu, B. McCarl
{"title":"Economic impacts of avian influenza disease control strategies in the USA due to Texas outbreaks","authors":"Jianhong E. Mu, B. McCarl","doi":"10.1504/IJRAM.2018.10014967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the economic consequences of imposing quarantine with and without adding vaccination in controlling avian influenza (AI) outbreaks. We evaluated the benefits using a partial equilibrium, US agricultural sector model and found that the strategies were not significantly different in their benefits if consumer demand was not reduced by concerns over the outbreak. However, we did find impacts differed when the outbreak was associated with a consumer demand reduction. Specifically, under a scenario where consumers reduced demand by 20%, the quarantine with vaccination strategy was found to dominate the quarantine only strategy. In contrast, we found the quarantine only strategy was relatively more cost-effective when there was no demand reduction.","PeriodicalId":35420,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2018.10014967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the economic consequences of imposing quarantine with and without adding vaccination in controlling avian influenza (AI) outbreaks. We evaluated the benefits using a partial equilibrium, US agricultural sector model and found that the strategies were not significantly different in their benefits if consumer demand was not reduced by concerns over the outbreak. However, we did find impacts differed when the outbreak was associated with a consumer demand reduction. Specifically, under a scenario where consumers reduced demand by 20%, the quarantine with vaccination strategy was found to dominate the quarantine only strategy. In contrast, we found the quarantine only strategy was relatively more cost-effective when there was no demand reduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德克萨斯州禽流感疫情对美国禽流感控制策略的经济影响
我们比较了在控制禽流感(AI)暴发时实施检疫和不增加疫苗接种的经济后果。我们使用部分均衡的美国农业部门模型评估了这些策略的效益,发现如果消费者需求没有因为对疫情的担忧而减少,那么这些策略的效益并没有显著差异。然而,我们确实发现,当疫情与消费者需求减少有关时,影响是不同的。具体而言,在消费者需求减少20%的情况下,发现接种疫苗的隔离策略在仅隔离策略中占主导地位。相比之下,我们发现在不减少需求的情况下,仅隔离策略相对更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The IJRAM is an interdisciplinary and refereed journal that provides cross learning between: - Different business and economics, as well as scientific and technological, disciplines - Energy industries, environmental and ecological systems - Safety, public health and medical services - Software services, reliability and safety
期刊最新文献
A unified fuzzy system for evaluating work related postural risk score of discomfort prone body parts of workers through rapid upper limb assessment Deciding when defence in depth control strategies are necessary for risk management and crisis response Uncertainty and resilience in strategic management: profile of a robust company Prehospital emergency medical treatment teams' competence to act in an AMOK situation On the use of analytical inequalities for improving reliability and reducing risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1