The state of the science on trauma inquiry

IF 2.7 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Womens Health Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1177/1745506519861234
A. Lewis-O’Connor, A. Warren, Jeannie Lee, Nomi C. Levy-Carrick, Samara Grossman, Mardi Chadwick, Hanni Stoklosa, E. Rittenberg
{"title":"The state of the science on trauma inquiry","authors":"A. Lewis-O’Connor, A. Warren, Jeannie Lee, Nomi C. Levy-Carrick, Samara Grossman, Mardi Chadwick, Hanni Stoklosa, E. Rittenberg","doi":"10.1177/1745506519861234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the context of longitudinal medical care for adults, health care providers have a unique opportunity to inquire and respond to the traumatic life experiences affecting the health of their patients, as well as a responsibility to minimize retraumatizing these patients during medical encounters. While there is literature on screening women for intimate partner violence, and there is emerging data on pediatric screening for adverse life experiences, there is sparse literature on inquiry of broader trauma histories in adult medical settings. This lack of research on trauma inquiry results in an absence of guidelines for best practices, in turn making it challenging for policy makers, health care providers, and researchers to mitigate the adverse health outcomes caused by traumatic experiences and to provide equitable care to populations that experience a disproportionate burden of trauma. This state of the science summarizes current inquiry practices for patients who have experienced trauma, violence, and abuse. It places trauma inquiry within an anchoring framework of trauma-informed care principles, and emphasizes a focus on resilience. It then proposes best practices for trauma inquiry, which include tiered screening starting with broad trauma inquiry, proceeding to risk and safety assessment as indicated, and ending with connection to interventions.","PeriodicalId":47398,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1745506519861234","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1745506519861234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Within the context of longitudinal medical care for adults, health care providers have a unique opportunity to inquire and respond to the traumatic life experiences affecting the health of their patients, as well as a responsibility to minimize retraumatizing these patients during medical encounters. While there is literature on screening women for intimate partner violence, and there is emerging data on pediatric screening for adverse life experiences, there is sparse literature on inquiry of broader trauma histories in adult medical settings. This lack of research on trauma inquiry results in an absence of guidelines for best practices, in turn making it challenging for policy makers, health care providers, and researchers to mitigate the adverse health outcomes caused by traumatic experiences and to provide equitable care to populations that experience a disproportionate burden of trauma. This state of the science summarizes current inquiry practices for patients who have experienced trauma, violence, and abuse. It places trauma inquiry within an anchoring framework of trauma-informed care principles, and emphasizes a focus on resilience. It then proposes best practices for trauma inquiry, which include tiered screening starting with broad trauma inquiry, proceeding to risk and safety assessment as indicated, and ending with connection to interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤调查的科学现状
在成人纵向医疗保健的背景下,卫生保健提供者有一个独特的机会来询问和回应影响患者健康的创伤性生活经历,以及在医疗接触中最大限度地减少这些患者的再创伤的责任。虽然有关于女性亲密伴侣暴力筛查的文献,也有关于儿科不良生活经历筛查的新数据,但关于成人医疗机构中更广泛的创伤史调查的文献很少。创伤调查研究的缺乏导致缺乏最佳实践指南,这反过来又使政策制定者、卫生保健提供者和研究人员在减轻创伤经历造成的不良健康后果和向遭受不成比例创伤负担的人群提供公平护理方面面临挑战。这一科学状态总结了目前对经历过创伤、暴力和虐待的患者的询问实践。它将创伤调查置于创伤知情护理原则的锚定框架内,并强调对复原力的关注。然后,它提出了创伤调查的最佳做法,其中包括从广泛的创伤调查开始的分层筛查,按照指示进行风险和安全评估,并以干预措施结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Womens Health
Womens Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: For many diseases, women’s physiology and life-cycle hormonal changes demand important consideration when determining healthcare management options. Age- and gender-related factors can directly affect treatment outcomes, and differences between the clinical management of, say, an adolescent female and that in a pre- or postmenopausal patient may be either subtle or profound. At the same time, there are certain conditions that are far more prevalent in women than men, and these may require special attention. Furthermore, in an increasingly aged population in which women demonstrate a greater life-expectancy.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and determinants of the involvement of married men in family planning services in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis A survey of women’s experiences of using period tracker applications: Attitudes, ovulation prediction and how the accuracy of the app in predicting period start dates affects their feelings and behaviours ‘It feels like my visibility matters’: Women ageing with HIV overcoming the ‘violence of invisibility’ through community, advocacy and the radical act of care for others HIV prevention – Challenges in reaching Libyan women: A narrative review Multilevel analysis of factors associated with utilization of institutional delivery in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1