Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy based navigation assisted C1, 2 transarticular screw placement for the treatment of atlantoaxia instability

Hua-zheng Wang, D. He, Bo Liu, Yuqing Sun
{"title":"Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy based navigation assisted C1, 2 transarticular screw placement for the treatment of atlantoaxia instability","authors":"Hua-zheng Wang, D. He, Bo Liu, Yuqing Sun","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2019.21.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the accuracy of transarticular screw fixation using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation (ITFN) and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this treatment method. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 56 patients(26 males and 30 females) with atlantoaxial instability who were treated by C1, 2 transarticular screw fixation using ITFN from November 2005 to October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 44.5 years (range, 9-68 years). There were 44 cases with congenital malformation, 4 with old odontoid fracture, 7 with spontaneous dislocation, and 1 with rheumatoid arthritis. C2 isthmus width and height were measured on preoperatively obtained CT scans, and screw positioning was evaluated on postoperatively obtained CT scans, and classified into three types: ideal position (type I), acceptable position (type II) and unacceptable position (type III). A novel grading system is proposed based on previous study and grading system, and the difficulty of placing C1, 2 transarticular screw using ITFN was classified into three types: easy (total score 0), median (total score 1) and hard (total score 2, 3). Pain scores were assessed using the visual analogue scale. Myelopathy was assessed using the Nurick scale and Odom’s criteria. \n \n \nResults \nThe isthmus width was 5.46±1.86 mm on the right side and 5.38±1.36 mm on the left side. The isthmus height was 4.89±1.33 mm on the right side and 4.97±1.17 mm on the left side. According to the grading system, 78, 11, and 23 of the sides were classified into easy, median and hard groups respectively. One hundred and seven transarticular screws were placed in 56 patients, and 71.03% of which were ideal screws, and 28.97% were acceptable screws. Five patients had unilateral screws placed. There was no significant difference in screw positioning among the three groups (χ2=0.46, 0.54, 1.18; P=0.50, 0.46,0.28). The mean follow-up period was 44.7 months (range, 6-120 months). At the latest follow-up, according to Nurick score, there are 30 patients scoring 0, 25 patients scoring 1, and 1 patient scoring 2. According to Odom’s criteria, outcomes were as follows: excellent, 66.1%; good, 26.8%; fair, 7.1%; and poor, 0%. All patients with preoperative neck pain had symptom relief or improvement, with more than 89.33% improvement in visual analogue scale scores. No dural laceration, injury to the vertebral artery, spinal cord, or hypoglossal nerve were noted. \n \n \nConclusion \nITFN is a safe, accurate, and effective tool for transarticular screw placement in patients with atlantoaxial instability. \n \n \nKey words: \nCervical atlas; Axis; Joint instability; Surgery, computer-assisted","PeriodicalId":36405,"journal":{"name":"中华骨科杂志","volume":"39 1","pages":"1311-1319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2019.21.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of transarticular screw fixation using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation (ITFN) and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this treatment method. Methods Data of 56 patients(26 males and 30 females) with atlantoaxial instability who were treated by C1, 2 transarticular screw fixation using ITFN from November 2005 to October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 44.5 years (range, 9-68 years). There were 44 cases with congenital malformation, 4 with old odontoid fracture, 7 with spontaneous dislocation, and 1 with rheumatoid arthritis. C2 isthmus width and height were measured on preoperatively obtained CT scans, and screw positioning was evaluated on postoperatively obtained CT scans, and classified into three types: ideal position (type I), acceptable position (type II) and unacceptable position (type III). A novel grading system is proposed based on previous study and grading system, and the difficulty of placing C1, 2 transarticular screw using ITFN was classified into three types: easy (total score 0), median (total score 1) and hard (total score 2, 3). Pain scores were assessed using the visual analogue scale. Myelopathy was assessed using the Nurick scale and Odom’s criteria. Results The isthmus width was 5.46±1.86 mm on the right side and 5.38±1.36 mm on the left side. The isthmus height was 4.89±1.33 mm on the right side and 4.97±1.17 mm on the left side. According to the grading system, 78, 11, and 23 of the sides were classified into easy, median and hard groups respectively. One hundred and seven transarticular screws were placed in 56 patients, and 71.03% of which were ideal screws, and 28.97% were acceptable screws. Five patients had unilateral screws placed. There was no significant difference in screw positioning among the three groups (χ2=0.46, 0.54, 1.18; P=0.50, 0.46,0.28). The mean follow-up period was 44.7 months (range, 6-120 months). At the latest follow-up, according to Nurick score, there are 30 patients scoring 0, 25 patients scoring 1, and 1 patient scoring 2. According to Odom’s criteria, outcomes were as follows: excellent, 66.1%; good, 26.8%; fair, 7.1%; and poor, 0%. All patients with preoperative neck pain had symptom relief or improvement, with more than 89.33% improvement in visual analogue scale scores. No dural laceration, injury to the vertebral artery, spinal cord, or hypoglossal nerve were noted. Conclusion ITFN is a safe, accurate, and effective tool for transarticular screw placement in patients with atlantoaxial instability. Key words: Cervical atlas; Axis; Joint instability; Surgery, computer-assisted
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中三维透视导航辅助C1,2关节内螺钉置入治疗寰枢椎不稳
目的评价术中三维荧光透视导航(ITFN)经关节螺钉内固定的准确性,并评价该治疗方法的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2005年11月至2015年10月应用ITFN经关节C1,2螺钉内固定治疗寰枢椎不稳56例(男26例,女30例)的临床资料。患者的平均年龄为44.5岁(范围为9-68岁)。先天性畸形44例,陈旧性齿状突骨折4例,自发性脱位7例,类风湿性关节炎1例。术前CT扫描测量C2峡部宽度和高度,术后CT扫描评估螺钉定位,分为三种类型:理想位置(I型)、合格位置(II型)和不合格位置(III型)。在以往研究和评分系统的基础上,提出了一种新的评分系统,将ITFN置入C1,2关节内螺钉的难度分为三类:易(总分0)、中(总分1)和难(总分2,3)。使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛评分。脊髓病的评估使用努里克量表和Odom的标准。结果峡部宽度右侧为5.46±1.86mm,左侧为5.38±1.36mm。峡部高度右侧为4.89±1.33mm,左侧为4.97±1.17mm。根据评分系统,78侧、11侧和23侧分别分为易组、中组和难组。在56名患者中放置了107颗经关节螺钉,其中71.03%是理想螺钉,28.97%是可接受螺钉。5名患者放置了单侧螺钉。三组螺钉定位无显著差异(χ2=0.46,0.54,1.18;P=0.50,0.46,0.28),平均随访时间44.7个月(6-120个月)。在最近的随访中,根据Nurick评分,有30名患者得分为0,25名患者得分1,1名患者得分2。根据Odom的标准,结果如下:优秀,66.1%;良好26.8%;尚可,7.1%;较差,0%。所有术前颈部疼痛患者的症状均得到缓解或改善,视觉模拟量表评分改善超过89.33%。未发现硬膜撕裂、椎动脉、脊髓或舌下神经损伤。结论ITFN是一种安全、准确、有效的寰枢椎不稳定患者关节内螺钉置入工具。关键词:宫颈图谱;Axis;关节不稳定;手术,计算机辅助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华骨科杂志
中华骨科杂志 Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8153
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of the efficacy and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative scoliosis A comparative study on the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis by oblique interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody fusion Rooting, and growing with luxuriant branches and leaves-the story of oblique lateral interbody fusion in China Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases with ruptured disc herniation The complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1