Do crop prices share common trends and common cycles?*

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI:10.1111/1467-8489.12464
Puneet Vatsa
{"title":"Do crop prices share common trends and common cycles?*","authors":"Puneet Vatsa","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global crop prices decidedly co-move: research supporting this view abounds. What is unclear is how strong the co-movement is between them. This paper tests for a strong form of co-movement amongst global crop prices before and after the global financial crisis (GFC) using a multivariate decomposition framework based on a serial-correlation common feature. More specifically, we analyze common trends (i.e., long-run co-movement) and common cycles (i.e., short-run co-movement) amongst the global prices of five major crops: corn, palm oil, rice, soybean, and wheat. We show that corn and soybean prices are closely associated in the long and the short run—they respond similarly to persistent and transitory shocks. Furthermore, their associations have strengthened since the GFC. In contrast, the co-movement of rice prices with the other crop prices has weakened during the 2010s. Overall, the cycles are relatively muted after the GFC, indicating that the five crop prices are trend-dominated during this period; the observed prices adhere closely to their long-run trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"66 2","pages":"363-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Global crop prices decidedly co-move: research supporting this view abounds. What is unclear is how strong the co-movement is between them. This paper tests for a strong form of co-movement amongst global crop prices before and after the global financial crisis (GFC) using a multivariate decomposition framework based on a serial-correlation common feature. More specifically, we analyze common trends (i.e., long-run co-movement) and common cycles (i.e., short-run co-movement) amongst the global prices of five major crops: corn, palm oil, rice, soybean, and wheat. We show that corn and soybean prices are closely associated in the long and the short run—they respond similarly to persistent and transitory shocks. Furthermore, their associations have strengthened since the GFC. In contrast, the co-movement of rice prices with the other crop prices has weakened during the 2010s. Overall, the cycles are relatively muted after the GFC, indicating that the five crop prices are trend-dominated during this period; the observed prices adhere closely to their long-run trends.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农作物价格是否有共同的趋势和周期?*
全球农作物价格无疑是同步变动的:支持这一观点的研究比比皆是。目前尚不清楚的是,他们之间的联合运动有多强。本文使用基于序列相关共同特征的多元分解框架,对全球金融危机(GFC)前后全球农作物价格之间的强联合运动形式进行了检验。更具体地说,我们分析了全球五种主要作物(玉米、棕榈油、大米、大豆和小麦)价格的共同趋势(即长期共同运动)和共同周期(即短期共同运动)。我们表明,玉米和大豆价格在长期和短期内密切相关——它们对持续和短暂冲击的反应相似。此外,自全球金融危机以来,它们之间的联系得到了加强。相比之下,稻米价格与其他作物价格的联动在2010年代有所减弱。总体而言,全球金融危机后的周期相对较弱,表明这五种作物价格在此期间受趋势主导;观察到的价格与它们的长期趋势密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Measuring quantity in ecosystem markets and ecosystem accounts Electricity contract design and wholesale market outcomes in Australia's National Electricity Market Beyond risk management: Crop insurance premium subsidies reduce cropland abandonment in China Effect of dependence on natural resources on employment quality: Insights from African countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1