Ecology, Epistemology, and Divination in Cicero De Divinatione 1.90–94

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2019-03-06 DOI:10.1353/ARE.2018.0011
Dan-el Padilla Peralta
{"title":"Ecology, Epistemology, and Divination in Cicero De Divinatione 1.90–94","authors":"Dan-el Padilla Peralta","doi":"10.1353/ARE.2018.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 249 bce, when the outcome of the First Punic War was still in the balance, a Roman consul misbehaved in a spectacularly memorable—and revealing—fashion. After leading a naval force towards the harbor of Drepana in an effort to surprise the Carthaginian fleet moored there, Publius Claudius Pulcher sought the approval of the gods prior to battle. The sacred chickens kept on board for auspice taking were let out of their cages and feed was sprinkled before them. They did not peck, an emphatic, “Do not proceed,” from the gods to P. Claudius Pulcher, but the commander, itching for battle, chose not only to ignore the omen but to have the chickens tossed overboard. The ensuing battle was a calamity: of the more than one hundred Roman ships at the encounter, only thirty escaped; the remainder were captured or sunk. Beating a quick return back to Rome, P. Claudius Pulcher was forced to appoint a dictator by the senate and narrowly escaped conviction on a malfeasance charge. In the exemplary discourses of the late Roman republic and early empire, the incident became a byword for the temerity and foolishness of mocking and disregarding the auspices.1","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"51 1","pages":"237 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ARE.2018.0011","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ARE.2018.0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 249 bce, when the outcome of the First Punic War was still in the balance, a Roman consul misbehaved in a spectacularly memorable—and revealing—fashion. After leading a naval force towards the harbor of Drepana in an effort to surprise the Carthaginian fleet moored there, Publius Claudius Pulcher sought the approval of the gods prior to battle. The sacred chickens kept on board for auspice taking were let out of their cages and feed was sprinkled before them. They did not peck, an emphatic, “Do not proceed,” from the gods to P. Claudius Pulcher, but the commander, itching for battle, chose not only to ignore the omen but to have the chickens tossed overboard. The ensuing battle was a calamity: of the more than one hundred Roman ships at the encounter, only thirty escaped; the remainder were captured or sunk. Beating a quick return back to Rome, P. Claudius Pulcher was forced to appoint a dictator by the senate and narrowly escaped conviction on a malfeasance charge. In the exemplary discourses of the late Roman republic and early empire, the incident became a byword for the temerity and foolishness of mocking and disregarding the auspices.1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态学,认识论,和西塞罗的占卜,1.90-94
公元前249年,当第一次布匿战争的结果还处于平衡状态时,一位罗马执政官的行为不端,令人难忘,也很暴露。Publius Claudius Pulcher率领海军部队前往德雷帕纳港,试图给停泊在那里的迦太基舰队一个惊喜,之后在战斗前寻求众神的批准。船上为祈福而饲养的神鸡被从笼子里放出来,饲料撒在它们面前。他们没有啄,从众神那里向P·克劳迪乌斯·普彻(P.Claudius Pulcher)强调“不要继续”,但这位渴望战斗的指挥官不仅选择无视这一预兆,还选择把鸡扔到船外。随后的战斗是一场灾难:在遭遇战中的100多艘罗马船只中,只有30艘逃脱;其余部分被俘获或击沉。克劳迪乌斯·普尔彻(P.Claudius Pulcher)迅速返回罗马,被迫被参议院任命为独裁者,并侥幸逃脱渎职指控。在罗马共和国晚期和帝国早期的典型话语中,这一事件成为嘲笑和无视主持的鲁莽和愚蠢的代名词。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
A New Musical Helen Musical Structure in Greek Tragedy: Introduction Performing Aeschylus's Persians Musical Structure and the Interpretability of Agamemnon 1513–20 From the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1