Working, living and dying in COVID times: perspectives from frontline adult social care workers in the UK

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Safer Communities Pub Date : 2021-08-05 DOI:10.1108/SC-04-2021-0013
D. Briggs, L. Telford, Anthony Lloyd, A. Ellis
{"title":"Working, living and dying in COVID times: perspectives from frontline adult social care workers in the UK","authors":"D. Briggs, L. Telford, Anthony Lloyd, A. Ellis","doi":"10.1108/SC-04-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore 15 UK adult social care workers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper’s 15 open-ended interviews with adult social care workers are complemented by digital ethnography in COVID-19 social media forums. This data set is taken from a global mixed-methods study, involving over 2,000 participants from 59 different countries.\n\n\nFindings\nWorkers reported a lack of planning, guidance and basic provisions including personal protective equipment. Work intensification brought stress, workload pressure and mental health problems. Family difficulties and challenges of living through the pandemic, often related to government restrictions, intensified these working conditions with precarious living arrangements. The workers also relayed a myriad of challenges for their residents in which, the circumstances appear to have exacerbated dementia and general health problems including dehydration, delirium and loneliness. Whilst COVID-19 was seen as partially responsible for resident deaths, the sudden disruptions to daily life and prohibitions on family visits were identified as additional contributing factors in rapid and sudden decline.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWhilst the paper’s sample cohort is small, given the significance of COVID-19 at this present time the findings shed important light on the care home experience as well as act as a baseline for future study.\n\n\nSocial implications\nCare homes bore the brunt of illness and death during the first and second COVID-19 waves in the UK, and many of the problems identified here have still yet to be actioned by the government. As people approach the summer months, an urgent review is required of what happened in care homes and this paper could act as some part of that evidence gathering.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper offers revealing insights from frontline care home workers and thus provides an empirical snapshot during this unique phase in recent history. It also builds upon the preliminary/emerging qualitative research evidence on how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted care homes, care workers and the residents.\n","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-04-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore 15 UK adult social care workers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach This paper’s 15 open-ended interviews with adult social care workers are complemented by digital ethnography in COVID-19 social media forums. This data set is taken from a global mixed-methods study, involving over 2,000 participants from 59 different countries. Findings Workers reported a lack of planning, guidance and basic provisions including personal protective equipment. Work intensification brought stress, workload pressure and mental health problems. Family difficulties and challenges of living through the pandemic, often related to government restrictions, intensified these working conditions with precarious living arrangements. The workers also relayed a myriad of challenges for their residents in which, the circumstances appear to have exacerbated dementia and general health problems including dehydration, delirium and loneliness. Whilst COVID-19 was seen as partially responsible for resident deaths, the sudden disruptions to daily life and prohibitions on family visits were identified as additional contributing factors in rapid and sudden decline. Research limitations/implications Whilst the paper’s sample cohort is small, given the significance of COVID-19 at this present time the findings shed important light on the care home experience as well as act as a baseline for future study. Social implications Care homes bore the brunt of illness and death during the first and second COVID-19 waves in the UK, and many of the problems identified here have still yet to be actioned by the government. As people approach the summer months, an urgent review is required of what happened in care homes and this paper could act as some part of that evidence gathering. Originality/value This paper offers revealing insights from frontline care home workers and thus provides an empirical snapshot during this unique phase in recent history. It also builds upon the preliminary/emerging qualitative research evidence on how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted care homes, care workers and the residents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎时代的工作、生活和死亡:来自英国一线成人社会护理工作者的视角
目的探讨英国15名成人社会护理工作者在COVID-19大流行期间的经验。设计/方法/方法本文对成人社会护理工作者进行了15次开放式访谈,并在COVID-19社交媒体论坛上进行了数字人种学的补充。这组数据来自一项全球混合方法研究,涉及来自59个不同国家的2000多名参与者。工人们报告说,缺乏规划、指导和包括个人防护装备在内的基本规定。工作强度加大带来了压力、工作量压力和心理健康问题。疫情期间的家庭困难和生活挑战往往与政府的限制有关,加剧了这些工作条件和不稳定的生活安排。这些工人也给他们的居民带来了无数的挑战,其中的环境似乎加剧了痴呆症和一般的健康问题,包括脱水、谵妄和孤独。虽然COVID-19被视为居民死亡的部分原因,但日常生活的突然中断和禁止家庭探视被认为是导致人口迅速和突然下降的其他因素。虽然本文的样本队列很小,但鉴于目前COVID-19的重要性,研究结果为养老院的经验提供了重要启示,并为未来的研究奠定了基础。在英国的第一次和第二次COVID-19浪潮中,家庭首当其冲地遭受了疾病和死亡的冲击,这里发现的许多问题仍有待政府采取行动。随着夏季的临近,人们需要对养老院发生的事情进行紧急审查,本文可以作为证据收集的一部分。原创性/价值本文提供了一线护理院工作人员的启示,从而提供了最近历史上这一独特阶段的经验快照。它还建立在初步/新出现的关于COVID-19大流行如何影响养老院、护理人员和居民的定性研究证据的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Navigating perilous seas: unmasking online banking frauds, perceived usefulness, fear of cybercrime and distrust in online banking Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and terrorism: a rapid evidence assessment of risk and vulnerability factors, and implications for intervention Assaults in public places: interesting numbers from a North American university city Government’s failure to protect its citizens against nomadic herders’ aggression: a tacit permission for self-defense in Plateau State, Nigeria Hate-motivated crimes in Brazil: an overview of crimes against LGBTQI+ people
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1