VICARIOUS EMBARRASSMENT SCALE: MORE OF CULTURE THAN EMPATHY

Q4 Psychology Psychological Thought Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.37708/psyct.v16i1.739
Yohanes Budiarto, Faturochman Faturochman, Galang Lufityanto
{"title":"VICARIOUS EMBARRASSMENT SCALE: MORE OF CULTURE THAN EMPATHY","authors":"Yohanes Budiarto, Faturochman Faturochman, Galang Lufityanto","doi":"10.37708/psyct.v16i1.739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, the vicarious embarrassment scale (VES) is developed by involving a protagonist with no relationship with the observer. This condition becomes problematic, especially in collectivistic contexts with interdependence in personal social relations. The protagonists of the original VES were modified from strangers to friends and family and were compared their psychometric properties and associations with empathy and self-construals. A total of 112 university students in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, filled out the online questionnaires voluntarily. Tests with Unrestricted Factor Analysis showed the retrieved eigenvalues of VES Other, VES Friend, and VES Family accounted for 61.54, 68.29, and 77.05, respectively. All VES were unidimensional, according to the parallel analysis with robust parallel using 500 random polychoric correlation matrices. Good internal consistency reliability was achieved, and fit criteria were met. This study supported previous findings of VES disassociation with empathy. The importance of cultural values reflected in self-construal showed interdependent self-construal relations with different protagonists with all VE scales. In contrast, independent self-construal was associated only with vicarious embarrassment with an unknown protagonist.","PeriodicalId":37380,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Thought","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v16i1.739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, the vicarious embarrassment scale (VES) is developed by involving a protagonist with no relationship with the observer. This condition becomes problematic, especially in collectivistic contexts with interdependence in personal social relations. The protagonists of the original VES were modified from strangers to friends and family and were compared their psychometric properties and associations with empathy and self-construals. A total of 112 university students in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, filled out the online questionnaires voluntarily. Tests with Unrestricted Factor Analysis showed the retrieved eigenvalues of VES Other, VES Friend, and VES Family accounted for 61.54, 68.29, and 77.05, respectively. All VES were unidimensional, according to the parallel analysis with robust parallel using 500 random polychoric correlation matrices. Good internal consistency reliability was achieved, and fit criteria were met. This study supported previous findings of VES disassociation with empathy. The importance of cultural values reflected in self-construal showed interdependent self-construal relations with different protagonists with all VE scales. In contrast, independent self-construal was associated only with vicarious embarrassment with an unknown protagonist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
替代尴尬量表:更多的是文化而非同理心
传统上,替代尴尬量表(VES)是通过让主人公与观察者没有关系来开发的。这种情况变得有问题,尤其是在个人社会关系相互依存的集体主义背景下。最初的VES的主人公从陌生人变成了朋友和家人,并将他们的心理测量特性以及与移情和自我建构的联系进行了比较。印尼日惹共有112名大学生自愿填写了在线问卷。无限制因子分析测试显示,VES Other、VES Friend和VES Family的检索特征值分别为61.54、68.29和77.05。根据使用500个随机多色相关矩阵的稳健并行的并行分析,所有VES都是一维的。实现了良好的内部一致性可靠性,并符合拟合标准。这项研究支持了先前关于VES与移情分离的研究结果。文化价值观在自我建构中的重要性在所有VE量表中都表现出与不同主体之间相互依存的自我建构关系。相比之下,独立的自我建构只与未知主人公的替代尴尬有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Thought
Psychological Thought Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Psychological Thought" publishes its papers in English or in Bulgarian in all areas of psychology. It is focused on the psychological theory and practice. The papers could be some original research articles, meta-analysis data, clinical reports, case studies, students'' essays, and book reviews. This journal is designed for psychologists, researchers, and psychology students.
期刊最新文献
POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: GENESIS, STATUS, AND PROSPECTS. INTERVIEW WITH PROF. RUMEN STAMATOV, PH.D., D.SC. VALIDATION STUDY OF THE SPANISH VERSION OF THE PANDEMIC (COVID-19) ANXIETY TRAVEL SCALE IN PERU A SINGLE CASE STUDY IMPLEMENTING A 12-SESSION REHABILITATION JOURNEY: LESSONS LEARNED FROM 'CURTAIN DOWN' TO 'CURTAIN UP' REVIEW OF THE BOOK "PSYCHOANALYSIS IN BULGARIA UNTIL THE 40S OF THE 20TH CENTURY", WRITTEN BY ASSOC. PROF. STOIL MAVRODIEV, D.SC. TEST OF INVARIANCE OF THE ANOMIE BRIEF SCALE WITH THE ALIGNMENT METHOD IN 12 LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1