Implementing a Simulation-Based Distance Learning Model: How to Facilitate High-Engagement Experiential Training While Reducing the Risk of Infectious Disease Transmission Amongst Healthcare Professionals

IF 0.3 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.4274/eajem.galenos.2021.02350
Héctor Martínez Alonso, M. Holanda, Liébana Piedra, I. Del Moral, J. M. Maestre
{"title":"Implementing a Simulation-Based Distance Learning Model: How to Facilitate High-Engagement Experiential Training While Reducing the Risk of Infectious Disease Transmission Amongst Healthcare Professionals","authors":"Héctor Martínez Alonso, M. Holanda, Liébana Piedra, I. Del Moral, J. M. Maestre","doi":"10.4274/eajem.galenos.2021.02350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We aim to describe and evaluate a new model for distance experiential learningin order to help reduce the transmission risk among professionals envolved in education activities. Materials and Methods: In April 2020, in partnership with our hospital's Emergency Department Educational Leadership, Valdecilla Virtual Hospital tested and introduced an experiential distance learning model. Professionals wanted to engage from their homes without having to travel to a simulation facility. Results: Between July 1 and 22, 2020 we ran seven courses following this new model of course. Each one consisted of a two-hour session on two consecutive days. There were 44 participants whose ages ranged from 26 to 53 years (average=40), 62% identified as female, and 68% reported working at the emergency department, 19% at the cardiology unit, 7% in primary care, and 5% in internal medicine. We evaluated the content validity, feasibility and acceptability of the model. The results of an anonymous survey filled in at the end of the course showed they considered the distance training model as realistic (92%), easy to use (95%), well-organized (94%), an engaging educational tool (94%), and desirable for practising in the future (94%). Conclusion: These results may encourage the educational community to develop more programs using this new approach of \"taking care of patients from a distance\" not only during a pandemic, but also on a regular basis. We think this model can achieve positive results using distance clinical simulation combining their traditional simulation technology to address the training needs of their healthcare organization.","PeriodicalId":11814,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2021.02350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: We aim to describe and evaluate a new model for distance experiential learningin order to help reduce the transmission risk among professionals envolved in education activities. Materials and Methods: In April 2020, in partnership with our hospital's Emergency Department Educational Leadership, Valdecilla Virtual Hospital tested and introduced an experiential distance learning model. Professionals wanted to engage from their homes without having to travel to a simulation facility. Results: Between July 1 and 22, 2020 we ran seven courses following this new model of course. Each one consisted of a two-hour session on two consecutive days. There were 44 participants whose ages ranged from 26 to 53 years (average=40), 62% identified as female, and 68% reported working at the emergency department, 19% at the cardiology unit, 7% in primary care, and 5% in internal medicine. We evaluated the content validity, feasibility and acceptability of the model. The results of an anonymous survey filled in at the end of the course showed they considered the distance training model as realistic (92%), easy to use (95%), well-organized (94%), an engaging educational tool (94%), and desirable for practising in the future (94%). Conclusion: These results may encourage the educational community to develop more programs using this new approach of "taking care of patients from a distance" not only during a pandemic, but also on a regular basis. We think this model can achieve positive results using distance clinical simulation combining their traditional simulation technology to address the training needs of their healthcare organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施基于模拟的远程学习模式:如何促进高参与度的体验式培训,同时降低医疗保健专业人员之间传染病传播的风险
目的:我们旨在描述和评估一种新的远程体验学习模式,以帮助降低参与教育活动的专业人员之间的传播风险。材料和方法:2020年4月,Valdecilla虚拟医院与我院急诊科教育领导层合作,测试并引入了体验式远程学习模式。专业人士希望在家中参与,而无需前往模拟设施。结果:在2020年7月1日至22日期间,我们按照这种新的课程模式开设了七门课程。每一次会议包括连续两天两小时的会议。44名参与者的年龄在26岁至53岁之间(平均40岁),62%为女性,68%报告在急诊科工作,19%在心脏科工作,7%在初级保健部门工作,5%在内科工作。我们评估了该模型的内容有效性、可行性和可接受性。课程结束时填写的一项匿名调查结果显示,他们认为远程训练模式现实(92%)、易于使用(95%)、组织良好(94%)、是一种引人入胜的教育工具(94%),并且适合未来练习(94%)。结论:这些结果可能会鼓励教育界开发更多的项目,不仅在大流行期间,而且定期使用这种“远距离照顾病人”的新方法。我们认为,使用远程临床模拟结合他们的传统模拟技术来满足他们医疗机构的培训需求,该模型可以取得积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Link between the SATIS-Stroke Questionnaire and the Modified Rankin Scale in Stroke Patients at 30 Days Post-discharge Attack on Health Care Workers: A New Complex Cancerous Humanitarian Emergency: High Time to Report and Resect Comparison of MGAP, GAP, and RTS for Predicting Early Mortality in Multiple Trauma Patients Bilateral Lingual Artery Embolization to Control Massive Oral Bleeding That Leads to Cardiac Arrest Epiglottitis with a Complication of Epiglottic Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1