Tax-Rate Biases in Tax Decisions: Experimental Evidence

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of the American Taxation Association Pub Date : 2022-03-02 DOI:10.2308/jata-2020-019
H. Amberger, Eva Eberhartinger, M. Kasper
{"title":"Tax-Rate Biases in Tax Decisions: Experimental Evidence","authors":"H. Amberger, Eva Eberhartinger, M. Kasper","doi":"10.2308/jata-2020-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates biases in tax decisions. In a series of four laboratory experiments with 303 students and 62 tax professionals, we document a systematic tax-rate bias in decisions under time constraints. Specifically, decision-makers overestimate the relevance of less complex tax-rate information compared to more complex tax-base information. This behavior leads to suboptimal tax decisions. We also find that decision-making, on average, is unaffected by professional experience: students and tax professionals are similarly prone to tax-rate bias. However, senior tax professionals are more rationally inattentive. These decision-makers are less likely to exhibit a tax-rate bias when exhibiting such bias is relatively costly. Overall, our findings suggest that resource constraints impede the use of complex tax-base information, which results in suboptimal tax decisions. Interviews with senior tax professionals indicate potential for tax-rate biases in real-world tax decisions and thereby provide directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":45477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2020-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study investigates biases in tax decisions. In a series of four laboratory experiments with 303 students and 62 tax professionals, we document a systematic tax-rate bias in decisions under time constraints. Specifically, decision-makers overestimate the relevance of less complex tax-rate information compared to more complex tax-base information. This behavior leads to suboptimal tax decisions. We also find that decision-making, on average, is unaffected by professional experience: students and tax professionals are similarly prone to tax-rate bias. However, senior tax professionals are more rationally inattentive. These decision-makers are less likely to exhibit a tax-rate bias when exhibiting such bias is relatively costly. Overall, our findings suggest that resource constraints impede the use of complex tax-base information, which results in suboptimal tax decisions. Interviews with senior tax professionals indicate potential for tax-rate biases in real-world tax decisions and thereby provide directions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税收决策中的税率偏差:实验证据
这项研究调查了税收决策中的偏见。在对303名学生和62名税务专业人员进行的一系列四个实验室实验中,我们记录了在时间限制下决策中的系统性税率偏差。具体而言,与更复杂的税基信息相比,决策者高估了不太复杂的税率信息的相关性。这种行为导致了次优的税收决策。我们还发现,平均而言,决策不受专业经验的影响:学生和税务专业人员同样容易产生税率偏见。然而,资深税务专业人士的注意力更为理性。这些决策者不太可能表现出税率偏见,因为表现出这种偏见的成本相对较高。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,资源限制阻碍了复杂税基信息的使用,这导致了次优的税收决策。对资深税务专业人士的采访表明,现实世界的税务决策中可能存在税率偏见,从而为未来的研究提供方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Managers’ Stock Price Incentives and Earnings Management Using Tax Expense The Efficiency of Interactive Voice Response Systems and Tax Compliance: A Field Experiment by the California Franchise Tax Board Editorial Policy DISCUSSION OF Companies’ Initial Estimates of the One-Time Transition Tax Imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Summaries of Papers In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1