Changes in ambulatory glucose profile in people with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system - two year follow-up retrospective analysis of real-world data
Michael Müller-Korbsch , Antonia Kietaibl , Yves Haufe , Peter Fasching
{"title":"Changes in ambulatory glucose profile in people with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system - two year follow-up retrospective analysis of real-world data","authors":"Michael Müller-Korbsch , Antonia Kietaibl , Yves Haufe , Peter Fasching","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, <em>P</em> = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, P = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, P = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, P = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, P = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.