Changes in ambulatory glucose profile in people with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system - two year follow-up retrospective analysis of real-world data

IF 1 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2023.100150
Michael Müller-Korbsch , Antonia Kietaibl , Yves Haufe , Peter Fasching
{"title":"Changes in ambulatory glucose profile in people with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system - two year follow-up retrospective analysis of real-world data","authors":"Michael Müller-Korbsch ,&nbsp;Antonia Kietaibl ,&nbsp;Yves Haufe ,&nbsp;Peter Fasching","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, <em>P</em> = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, P = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, P = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, P = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, P = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自动胰岛素输送系统的1型糖尿病患者动态血糖谱的变化-对真实世界数据的两年随访回顾性分析
在奥地利,可用的自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统的数量正在增加,糖尿病(PwD)患者越来越频繁地替代传感器增强泵(SAP)治疗。本研究是我们之前在2019年至2021年间进行的单中心回顾性分析的两年随访,比较了SAP和开源AID系统在1型糖尿病患者中的应用。这项第二年的分析包括25名PwD患者,并根据动态葡萄糖谱(AGP)调查血糖变化。与第一年相比,平均血糖(125.4 ~ 135.2 mg/dl, P = 0.038)、在范围内的时间(TIR, 84.2 ~ 77.0%, P = 0.012)、在范围内的时间(TAR, 11.6% ~ 18.5%, P = 0.017)和血糖危险指数(GRI, 24.8 ~ 35.0%, P = 0.026)均有所恶化。AID患者在第一年平均血糖和葡萄糖变异性的降低是由于高血糖时间的显著减少,从而导致更高的TIR和更低的GRI。在第二年的随访中,TIR和GRI表现出明显的恶化,这是糖尿病患者常见的现象。然而,开源AID系统显示出持续的安全性,因为即使在两年后,TBR也没有增加。尽管血糖参数略有恶化,但开源AID系统能够根据国际共识指南证明足够的血糖控制,同时提供减轻糖尿病管理负担的特征益处。对不同AID算法的描述性比较表明,通过更先进的功能,如基础速率修改、自动丸功能和自动调谐,改善了血糖控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of vitamin D status in obese and non-obese patients: A case-control study The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes-related mortality Diabetes in pregnancy: Anxious minds precarious times Primary care monitoring of HbA1c tests in type 2 diabetic patients in Northern France and impact of the successive COVID-19 pandemic containments Evaluation of a Support Tool for Diabetes Control in primary care – A Qualitative study with primary care staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1