Demystifying employee co-creation: optimism and pro-social behaviour as moderators

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Service Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1108/jstp-08-2022-0165
Yosafat Bangun, J. Fatima, Majharul Talukder
{"title":"Demystifying employee co-creation: optimism and pro-social behaviour as moderators","authors":"Yosafat Bangun, J. Fatima, Majharul Talukder","doi":"10.1108/jstp-08-2022-0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe human side of the job demands–resources (JD-R) model was this study's focus, examining job resources' impact on employees' co-creation intention. It considered employee satisfaction, engagement (vigour, absorption and dedication) and self-construal affect as mediators, with optimism and employee pro-social behaviour as moderators.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 214 responses from a survey questionnaire among service employees in Indonesia and Singapore were analysed with the partial least squares (PLS) method. Moderation and mediation analyses used multi-group analyses and bootstrapping.FindingsMost job resource indicators were found to be significant antecedents of employee co-creation intention. Optimism and pro-social behaviour significantly moderated the relationships between job support, vigour and absorption. A partial mediation effect was evident in the employee satisfaction–engagement relationship. Employees' self-efficacy and self-construal affect had a higher influence on employee co-creation intention than satisfaction or engagement.Research limitations/implicationsThe study considered only job resource-based indicators of the JD-R model and not those based on job demands. The moderation effect in the optimism–pro-social behaviour relationship considered job support but not interpersonal relationships and job autonomy.Practical implicationsThe study's findings would assist practitioners to motivate employees' co-creation intention through job resources and the employees' self-assessed emotions, such as optimism, pro-social behaviour and self-construal affect.Originality/valueThis study relates the JD-R model's job resources to service employees' co-creation intention, considering self-assessed emotions as mediators, while applying optimism and pro-social behaviour as moderators.","PeriodicalId":47021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-08-2022-0165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe human side of the job demands–resources (JD-R) model was this study's focus, examining job resources' impact on employees' co-creation intention. It considered employee satisfaction, engagement (vigour, absorption and dedication) and self-construal affect as mediators, with optimism and employee pro-social behaviour as moderators.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 214 responses from a survey questionnaire among service employees in Indonesia and Singapore were analysed with the partial least squares (PLS) method. Moderation and mediation analyses used multi-group analyses and bootstrapping.FindingsMost job resource indicators were found to be significant antecedents of employee co-creation intention. Optimism and pro-social behaviour significantly moderated the relationships between job support, vigour and absorption. A partial mediation effect was evident in the employee satisfaction–engagement relationship. Employees' self-efficacy and self-construal affect had a higher influence on employee co-creation intention than satisfaction or engagement.Research limitations/implicationsThe study considered only job resource-based indicators of the JD-R model and not those based on job demands. The moderation effect in the optimism–pro-social behaviour relationship considered job support but not interpersonal relationships and job autonomy.Practical implicationsThe study's findings would assist practitioners to motivate employees' co-creation intention through job resources and the employees' self-assessed emotions, such as optimism, pro-social behaviour and self-construal affect.Originality/valueThis study relates the JD-R model's job resources to service employees' co-creation intention, considering self-assessed emotions as mediators, while applying optimism and pro-social behaviour as moderators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开员工共同创造的神秘面纱:作为调节者的乐观主义和亲社会行为
目的工作需求-资源(JD-R)模型的人力方面是本研究的重点,考察了工作资源对员工共同创造意愿的影响。它认为员工满意度、敬业度(活力、专注和奉献)和自我建构情感是中介,乐观主义和员工亲社会行为是中介。设计/方法/方法采用偏最小二乘法对印度尼西亚和新加坡服务业员工的214份调查问卷进行了分析。调解和调停分析使用了多组分析和引导。发现大多数工作资源指标是员工共同创造意愿的重要前因。乐观主义和亲社会行为显著调节了工作支持、活力和吸收之间的关系。部分中介效应在员工满意度-敬业度关系中表现得很明显。员工的自我效能感和自我建构情感对员工共创意愿的影响高于满意度或敬业度。研究局限性/含义该研究只考虑了JD-R模型中基于工作的指标,而没有考虑基于工作需求的指标。乐观-亲社会行为关系中的调节效应考虑了工作支持,但没有考虑人际关系和工作自主性。实践意义该研究的发现将帮助从业者通过工作资源和员工的自我评估情绪,如乐观、亲社会行为和自我建构情感,来激励员工的共同创造意愿。原创性/价值本研究将JD-R模型的工作资源与服务员工的共同创造意图联系起来,将自我评估的情绪视为中介,同时将乐观主义和亲社会行为视为调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
15.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Managing Service Quality – Impact Factor: 1.286 (2015) – the Journal of Service Theory and Practice (JSTP) aims to publish research in the field of service management that not only makes a theoretical contribution to the service literature, but also scrutinizes and helps improve industry practices by offering specific recommendations and action plans to practitioners. Recognizing the importance of the service sector across the globe, the journal encourages submissions from and/or studying issues from around the world. JSTP gives prominence to research based on real world data, be it quantitative or qualitative. The journal also encourages the submission of strong conceptual and theoretical papers that make a substantive contribution to the scholarly literature in service management. JSTP publishes double-blind peer reviewed papers and encourages submissions from both academics and practitioners. The changing social structures and values, as well as new developments in economic, political, and technological fields are creating sea-changes in the philosophy, strategic aims, operational practices, and structures of many organizations. These changes are particularly relevant to the service sector, as public demand for high standards increases, and organizations fight for both market share and public credibility. The journal specifically addresses solutions to these challenges from a global, multi-cultural, and multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Does employee intervention encourage or discourage the spread of dysfunctional customer behavior? Determinants of customer buying behaviour in omnichannel retailing: a systematic literature review and future research directions Unlocking emotional labor: how organizational control systems shape frontline service employees’ emotional labor The edifying body: the role of embodied practices in the social production of servicescapes Occupational stress as a mediator between organisational intelligence traits and digital government service quality: a triangulation design approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1