{"title":"Magas, magia y libros en los primeros nueve libros del ciclo amadisiano","authors":"Daniel Gutiérrez Trápaga","doi":"10.7203/TIRANT.20.11230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESUMEN \n \nEl presente articulo se centra en la transformacion y valoracion de las magas y los libros de magia o grimorios en los primeros nueve libros del ciclo de Amadis. En estos textos, la mayor parte de los libros presentes en la diegesis son magicos y pertenecen a las magas, explicando su quehacer sobrenatural. Siguiendo una perspectiva diacronica, el analisis se remonta al modelo de las magas configurado en la literatura arturica, que influyo en el Amadis y fue modificado en sus continuaciones. El articulo explica las importantes divergencias en la funcion y presentacion de los grimorios, la magia y las magas al interior de este ciclo caballeresco. \n \nPALABRAS CLAVES \n \nmagas, magia, libros, grimorios, ciclo de Amadis, Urganda \n \nABSTRACT \n \nThis article studies the transformations and different views on an essential part of the magic landscape of the first nine books of the Amadis cycle: enchantresses and magic books (or grimoires). In these woks, most books that appear in the diegesis are magic ones and they usually belong to an enchantress. This study follows a diachronic approach, starting with the prototype of the enchantress created in Arthurian literature. The model of the Arthurian enchantress strongly influenced Amadis, whilst the sequels show significant innovation that emphasise the importance of grimoires for the characterisation of female characters. The article focuses on explaining the significant divergences in the depiction and function of enchantresses, grimoires, and magic in this chivalric cycle. \n \nKEYWORDS \n \nEnchantresses, Magic, Grimoires, Books, Amadis cycle, Urganda","PeriodicalId":40671,"journal":{"name":"Tirant","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tirant","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/TIRANT.20.11230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
RESUMEN
El presente articulo se centra en la transformacion y valoracion de las magas y los libros de magia o grimorios en los primeros nueve libros del ciclo de Amadis. En estos textos, la mayor parte de los libros presentes en la diegesis son magicos y pertenecen a las magas, explicando su quehacer sobrenatural. Siguiendo una perspectiva diacronica, el analisis se remonta al modelo de las magas configurado en la literatura arturica, que influyo en el Amadis y fue modificado en sus continuaciones. El articulo explica las importantes divergencias en la funcion y presentacion de los grimorios, la magia y las magas al interior de este ciclo caballeresco.
PALABRAS CLAVES
magas, magia, libros, grimorios, ciclo de Amadis, Urganda
ABSTRACT
This article studies the transformations and different views on an essential part of the magic landscape of the first nine books of the Amadis cycle: enchantresses and magic books (or grimoires). In these woks, most books that appear in the diegesis are magic ones and they usually belong to an enchantress. This study follows a diachronic approach, starting with the prototype of the enchantress created in Arthurian literature. The model of the Arthurian enchantress strongly influenced Amadis, whilst the sequels show significant innovation that emphasise the importance of grimoires for the characterisation of female characters. The article focuses on explaining the significant divergences in the depiction and function of enchantresses, grimoires, and magic in this chivalric cycle.
KEYWORDS
Enchantresses, Magic, Grimoires, Books, Amadis cycle, Urganda