EXPRESS: Scarcity Appeals in Cross-Cultural Settings: A Comprehensive Framework to Understand the Effectiveness of Scarcity Appeals in Cross-Cultural Settings

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of International Marketing Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1177/1069031x231191100
Ubedullah Khoso, É. Tafani, A. Qazi
{"title":"EXPRESS: Scarcity Appeals in Cross-Cultural Settings: A Comprehensive Framework to Understand the Effectiveness of Scarcity Appeals in Cross-Cultural Settings","authors":"Ubedullah Khoso, É. Tafani, A. Qazi","doi":"10.1177/1069031x231191100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scarcity appeals in marketing have long captured the attention of scholars and practitioners, yet we know little about their effectiveness across different cultures. Drawing on cultural differences (i.e., self-concept, need for uniqueness, and susceptibility to normative influence), the authors investigated the impact of culture on the effectiveness of (demand vs. supply-based) scarcity appeal. The authors also studied the impact of product visibility while considering the moderating effect of culture on the effectiveness of scarcity appeals (demand vs. supply-based). In doing so, the authors conducted an experimental research based on the participants from Pakistan and France. The authors found that (i) demand-based scarcity appeals were more effective than supply-based scarcity appeals in Eastern cultures, whereas the reverse was found in Western cultures; (ii) such moderating role of culture was stronger for high visibility products as compared to low visibility products; and (iii) the respective prevalence of interdependent (vs. independent) self and its subsequent impact on susceptibility to normative influence (SNI) and need for uniqueness (NFU) mediated the moderating role of culture. The authors concluded by discussing these findings' key theoretical contributions and managerial implications and suggesting future research directions.","PeriodicalId":48081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031x231191100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scarcity appeals in marketing have long captured the attention of scholars and practitioners, yet we know little about their effectiveness across different cultures. Drawing on cultural differences (i.e., self-concept, need for uniqueness, and susceptibility to normative influence), the authors investigated the impact of culture on the effectiveness of (demand vs. supply-based) scarcity appeal. The authors also studied the impact of product visibility while considering the moderating effect of culture on the effectiveness of scarcity appeals (demand vs. supply-based). In doing so, the authors conducted an experimental research based on the participants from Pakistan and France. The authors found that (i) demand-based scarcity appeals were more effective than supply-based scarcity appeals in Eastern cultures, whereas the reverse was found in Western cultures; (ii) such moderating role of culture was stronger for high visibility products as compared to low visibility products; and (iii) the respective prevalence of interdependent (vs. independent) self and its subsequent impact on susceptibility to normative influence (SNI) and need for uniqueness (NFU) mediated the moderating role of culture. The authors concluded by discussing these findings' key theoretical contributions and managerial implications and suggesting future research directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS:跨文化环境中的稀缺性诉求:一个理解跨文化环境中稀缺性诉求有效性的综合框架
营销中的稀缺性诉求长期以来一直受到学者和实践者的关注,但我们对其在不同文化中的有效性知之甚少。利用文化差异(即自我概念、对独特性的需求和对规范影响的敏感性),作者调查了文化对(基于需求与基于供应的)稀缺吸引力有效性的影响。作者还研究了产品知名度的影响,同时考虑了文化对稀缺性吸引力有效性的调节作用(基于需求vs.基于供应)。为此,作者对来自巴基斯坦和法国的参与者进行了一项实验研究。作者发现(i)在东方文化中,基于需求的稀缺性诉求比基于供应的稀缺性诉求更有效,而在西方文化中则相反;(ii)与低知名度产品相比,文化对高知名度产品的调节作用更强;(iii)相互依赖(与独立)自我的各自普遍性及其对规范影响敏感性(SNI)和独特性需求(NFU)的后续影响介导了文化的调节作用。最后,作者讨论了这些发现的主要理论贡献和管理意义,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: As the globalization of markets continues at a rapid pace, business practitioners and educators alike face the challenge of staying current with the developments. Marketing managers require a source of new information and insights on international business events. International marketing educators require a forum for disseminating their thoughts and research findings. Journal of International Marketing(JIM) is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing international marketing practice, research, and theory. Contributions addressing any aspect of international marketing management are published each quarter.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Global Events Demand Global Data: COVID-19 Crisis Responses and the Future of Selling and Sales Management around the Globe EXPRESS: Distance and Preference for Full vs. Shared Control: The Moderating Role of Decision-maker Self-construal EXPRESS: Should Global Brands Engage in Brand Activism? EXPRESS: Local-global Cobrand Positioning and Consumer Evaluations in Emerging Markets EXPRESS: Cultural Influences on Privacy Calculus in Loyalty Programs: an Analysis of Individual and National-Level Cultural Values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1