Mediators’ professional competence and personal qualities in conducting conciliation processes with varying degrees of success

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED SA Journal of Industrial Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-23 DOI:10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1870
Y. Korneeva, L. Shahova, N. Skripchenko
{"title":"Mediators’ professional competence and personal qualities in conducting conciliation processes with varying degrees of success","authors":"Y. Korneeva, L. Shahova, N. Skripchenko","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation: Mediation is becoming an increasingly popular conciliatory procedure, which makes it possible to increase the psychological protection of parties in disputes in educational, social environment and legal practice.Research purpose: To develop and empirically confirm the model of mediators’ professional competencies to determine the features of mediators’ professional competencies and personal characteristics in the conciliation procedure with varying degrees of success.Motivation for the study: Today, the profession of mediator is becoming increasingly popular; however, there is not enough information in scientific literature about the issues of specialists’ professional suitability to training and experience, desirable personality traits and competencies.Research approach/ design and method: A total of 103 mediators from the Russian Arkhangelsk region took part in the study. Research methods include psychological testing using Bardin and Presnov’s ‘11 personality factors’, Costa and McCray’s Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire adapted by Bodunov and Biryukov and questioning (the author’s self-assessment questionnaire of mediators’ professional competencies). Statistical processing was carried out using descriptive statistics, correlation (Pearson’s χ2), multivariate variance and stepwise multiple regression analysis using the SPSS 23 software package.Main findings: The mediators’ professional competence model includes communication, conflict management, problem analysis, planning and self-control. A self-assessment questionnaire for mediators’ professional competencies, which can be used by the 360-degree method, has been developed and tested. A conclusion was made that the success of a conciliation procedure is influenced by such personal qualities as self-control, communication, curiosity and morality. From the list of mediators’ professional qualities, compiled by the authors, the following ones directly influence the success of mediation: activity, specificity, openness, poise, organisation, responsibility and communication skills.Practical/managerial implications: It is necessary to provide additional support for novice mediators, because this will facilitate more active involvement in activities, conduct more conciliation process and subsequently lead to increased success.Contribution/value-add: The developed questionnaire for assessing professional competencies will help in the training and selection of mediators. It will allow us to highlight what key and specific competencies of the mediator hinder the achievement of a successful result in the rehabilitation procedure and require development.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orientation: Mediation is becoming an increasingly popular conciliatory procedure, which makes it possible to increase the psychological protection of parties in disputes in educational, social environment and legal practice.Research purpose: To develop and empirically confirm the model of mediators’ professional competencies to determine the features of mediators’ professional competencies and personal characteristics in the conciliation procedure with varying degrees of success.Motivation for the study: Today, the profession of mediator is becoming increasingly popular; however, there is not enough information in scientific literature about the issues of specialists’ professional suitability to training and experience, desirable personality traits and competencies.Research approach/ design and method: A total of 103 mediators from the Russian Arkhangelsk region took part in the study. Research methods include psychological testing using Bardin and Presnov’s ‘11 personality factors’, Costa and McCray’s Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire adapted by Bodunov and Biryukov and questioning (the author’s self-assessment questionnaire of mediators’ professional competencies). Statistical processing was carried out using descriptive statistics, correlation (Pearson’s χ2), multivariate variance and stepwise multiple regression analysis using the SPSS 23 software package.Main findings: The mediators’ professional competence model includes communication, conflict management, problem analysis, planning and self-control. A self-assessment questionnaire for mediators’ professional competencies, which can be used by the 360-degree method, has been developed and tested. A conclusion was made that the success of a conciliation procedure is influenced by such personal qualities as self-control, communication, curiosity and morality. From the list of mediators’ professional qualities, compiled by the authors, the following ones directly influence the success of mediation: activity, specificity, openness, poise, organisation, responsibility and communication skills.Practical/managerial implications: It is necessary to provide additional support for novice mediators, because this will facilitate more active involvement in activities, conduct more conciliation process and subsequently lead to increased success.Contribution/value-add: The developed questionnaire for assessing professional competencies will help in the training and selection of mediators. It will allow us to highlight what key and specific competencies of the mediator hinder the achievement of a successful result in the rehabilitation procedure and require development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调解员在进行调解过程中取得不同程度成功的专业能力和个人素质
方向:调解正成为一种越来越受欢迎的调解程序,这使得在教育、社会环境和法律实践中加强对纠纷当事人的心理保护成为可能。研究目的:建立并实证验证调解员职业能力模型,以确定调解员在不同成功程度的调解程序中的职业能力特征和个人特征。学习动机:如今,调解员这个职业越来越受欢迎;然而,科学文献中关于专家的专业适合性、培训和经验、理想的人格特征和能力等问题的信息还不够。研究方法/设计和方法:来自俄罗斯阿尔汉格尔斯克地区的103名调解员参与了这项研究。研究方法包括使用Bardin和Presnov的“11个人格因素”进行心理测试,Bodunov和Biryukov改编的Costa和McCray的“五因素人格问卷”以及提问(作者的调解员职业能力自我评估问卷)。统计处理采用描述性统计、相关(Pearsonχ2)、多变量方差和逐步多元回归分析,使用SPSS 23软件包进行。主要发现:调解员的职业能力模型包括沟通、冲突管理、问题分析、计划和自我控制。已经制定并测试了一份调解员职业能力自我评估问卷,可供360度方法使用。得出的结论是,调解程序的成功与否受到诸如自我控制、沟通、好奇心和道德等个人素质的影响。根据作者编制的调解员职业素质清单,以下因素直接影响调解的成功:积极性、特异性、开放性、沉着、组织性、责任感和沟通技巧。实际/管理影响:有必要为新手调解员提供额外支持,因为这将有助于更积极地参与活动,开展更多的调解进程,从而取得更大的成功。贡献/增值:编制的评估专业能力的调查表将有助于培训和选择调解员。这将使我们能够强调调解人的哪些关键和具体能力阻碍康复程序取得成功,需要发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Industrial and organisational psychology internship completion: Enabling and thwarting factors Transmogrification in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and beyond. Let that sink in The relationship between employee well-being and organisational effectiveness Exploring meaningful rewards for pharmaceutical employees during COVID-19 The organisational commitment of academic personnel during WFH within private higher education, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1