Development of Multidisciplinary Care Model With Participatory Action Research for Heart Failure Clinic in Bangkok, Thailand

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Research Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.56808/2586-940x.1051
Usasiri Srisakul, W. Umpornwirojkit, Supaporn Pattanasan, A. So-Ngern, Charlermsri Pummangura, S. Siwamogsatham
{"title":"Development of Multidisciplinary Care Model With Participatory Action Research for Heart Failure Clinic in Bangkok, Thailand","authors":"Usasiri Srisakul, W. Umpornwirojkit, Supaporn Pattanasan, A. So-Ngern, Charlermsri Pummangura, S. Siwamogsatham","doi":"10.56808/2586-940x.1051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Quality of care improvements is a challenge when resources are limited. In this participatory action research (PAR) study, we created a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) for heart failure clinic at a hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, and evaluated quality performance measures and clinical outcomes. Methods : Using the PAR framework, this study included: 1) identi fi cation of problems and planning solutions with providers, 2) development of the MCM, 3) implementation of the MCM, 4) evaluation of quality process and outcome measures among heart failure patients at the follow-up conducted 6 months after implementation of the MCM, and 5) post-MCM survey. Results : Information management of patient data, redundant work and communication, and ineffective work fl ow were the main problems identi fi ed. Providers suggested initiating a patient database, modifying the electronic health records, and developing an institutional map for heart failure care. Outcome measures were studied among 100 patients (mean age ¼ 61.92 years, SD ¼ 15.75; mean left ventricular ejection fraction ¼ 31.15%, SD ¼ 7.89). The mean guideline adherence indicator increased signi fi cantly (p ¼ 0.007) from baseline (87.50 ± 22.14%) to follow-up (94.50 ± 15.54%). At follow-up, there was a signi fi cant reduction for risk of heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 to 0.889). Most study participants agreed that all MCM components could solve existing problems with heart failure care. Conclusion : The PAR strategy used to develop the MCM for this heart failure clinic with limited resources was feasible and led to quality-of-care improvements.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940x.1051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Quality of care improvements is a challenge when resources are limited. In this participatory action research (PAR) study, we created a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) for heart failure clinic at a hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, and evaluated quality performance measures and clinical outcomes. Methods : Using the PAR framework, this study included: 1) identi fi cation of problems and planning solutions with providers, 2) development of the MCM, 3) implementation of the MCM, 4) evaluation of quality process and outcome measures among heart failure patients at the follow-up conducted 6 months after implementation of the MCM, and 5) post-MCM survey. Results : Information management of patient data, redundant work and communication, and ineffective work fl ow were the main problems identi fi ed. Providers suggested initiating a patient database, modifying the electronic health records, and developing an institutional map for heart failure care. Outcome measures were studied among 100 patients (mean age ¼ 61.92 years, SD ¼ 15.75; mean left ventricular ejection fraction ¼ 31.15%, SD ¼ 7.89). The mean guideline adherence indicator increased signi fi cantly (p ¼ 0.007) from baseline (87.50 ± 22.14%) to follow-up (94.50 ± 15.54%). At follow-up, there was a signi fi cant reduction for risk of heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 to 0.889). Most study participants agreed that all MCM components could solve existing problems with heart failure care. Conclusion : The PAR strategy used to develop the MCM for this heart failure clinic with limited resources was feasible and led to quality-of-care improvements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多学科护理模式的发展与参与行动研究在泰国曼谷心力衰竭诊所
背景:在资源有限的情况下,提高护理质量是一项挑战。在这项参与式行动研究(PAR)研究中,我们为泰国曼谷一家医院的心力衰竭诊所创建了一个多学科护理模型(MCM),并评估了质量绩效指标和临床结果。方法:采用PAR框架,本研究包括:1)与供应商识别问题并规划解决方案;2)MCM的制定;3)MCM的实施;4)在实施MCM后6个月对心力衰竭患者的质量过程和结果测量进行评估;5)MCM后调查。结果:患者数据的信息管理、冗余的工作和沟通以及无效的工作流程是确定的主要问题,提供者建议建立患者数据库,修改电子健康记录,并制定心力衰竭护理的机构地图。对100例患者(平均年龄61.92岁,SD 15.75;平均左室射血分数¼31.15%,SD¼7.89)。平均指南依从性指标从基线(87.50±22.14%)到随访(94.50±15.54%)显著增加(p¼0.007)。随访时,心衰住院风险显著降低(RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 ~ 0.889)。大多数研究参与者同意所有MCM组件都可以解决心力衰竭护理中存在的问题。结论:PAR策略用于开发MCM的心力衰竭诊所有限的资源是可行的,并导致护理质量的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with Health Literacy and Self-care Behaviors among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Mixed Method Study in Ko Kha District, Lampang Province, Northern Thailand Using Health Literacy as a Tool for Equity and Engagement in Health Systems Factors Predicting the Intention to Engage in Self-Protective Behavior against Monkeypox Infection among Thai People Malnutrition, Fear of Falling, and Quality of Life Are Associated with Frailty in Older Adults Employment and Self-rated Depression Among Older Persons in Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1