The gender dimension of outsiderness in Western Europe: a comparative cross-model analysis

Giovanni Amerigo Giuliani
{"title":"The gender dimension of outsiderness in Western Europe: a comparative cross-model analysis","authors":"Giovanni Amerigo Giuliani","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-12-2022-0317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe article investigates whether and to what extent outsiderness is gendered in Western Europe, both in terms of its spread and degree. It thus explores which male and female post-Fordist social classes are more exposed to the risk of this phenomenon. It also scrutinizes whether such a gendered characterization has varied over time and across clusters of Western European countries.Design/methodology/approachRelying on a comparative analysis of the data provided by the European Social Survey (ESS) dataset and comparing two points in time – the early/mid-2000s and the late 2010s – the work provides both a dichotomous and continuous variable of outsiderness, which measure its spread and degree in the female and male workforces of a pooled set of growth models.FindingsThe empirical analysis shows that outsiderness is profoundly gendered in Western Europe and thus a feminized social phenomenon. However, the comparative investigation highlights that outsiderness has been genderized in diverse ways across the four growth models. Different patterns of gendered outsiderness can be identified.Originality/valueThe article provides a comparative and diachronic analysis of outsiderness from a gender lens, putting into a mutual dialogue different literature on labour market, and shows that outsiderness represents a key analytical dimension for assessing gender inequalities.","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-12-2022-0317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe article investigates whether and to what extent outsiderness is gendered in Western Europe, both in terms of its spread and degree. It thus explores which male and female post-Fordist social classes are more exposed to the risk of this phenomenon. It also scrutinizes whether such a gendered characterization has varied over time and across clusters of Western European countries.Design/methodology/approachRelying on a comparative analysis of the data provided by the European Social Survey (ESS) dataset and comparing two points in time – the early/mid-2000s and the late 2010s – the work provides both a dichotomous and continuous variable of outsiderness, which measure its spread and degree in the female and male workforces of a pooled set of growth models.FindingsThe empirical analysis shows that outsiderness is profoundly gendered in Western Europe and thus a feminized social phenomenon. However, the comparative investigation highlights that outsiderness has been genderized in diverse ways across the four growth models. Different patterns of gendered outsiderness can be identified.Originality/valueThe article provides a comparative and diachronic analysis of outsiderness from a gender lens, putting into a mutual dialogue different literature on labour market, and shows that outsiderness represents a key analytical dimension for assessing gender inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西欧外来者的性别维度:跨模型比较分析
目的本文从传播和程度两个方面考察了超现代性在西欧是否以及在多大程度上被性别化。因此,它探讨了后福特主义社会阶层中哪些男性和女性更容易受到这种现象的风险。它还仔细审查了这种性别特征是否随着时间的推移和西欧国家集群的不同而有所不同。设计/方法论/方法基于对欧洲社会调查(ESS)数据集提供的数据的比较分析,并比较2000年代初/中期和2010年代末这两个时间点,这项工作提供了一个二分法和连续的超现代变量,用于衡量其在一组混合增长模型的女性和男性劳动力中的分布和程度。实证分析表明,超现代主义在西欧具有深刻的性别特征,是一种女性化的社会现象。然而,比较调查强调,在四种增长模式中,超现代性以不同的方式被性别化。可以识别出不同的性别外在模式。原创性/价值本文从性别视角对超现代性进行了比较和历时分析,将不同的劳动力市场文献进行了相互对话,并表明超现代性是评估性别不平等的一个关键分析维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
“What do you mean by that?”: solidarity in Canadian development practice Conquerors of poverty – a case study of Colombo slum dwellers Hybrid religious civil society organization, the Israeli case of “the path upwards” lesson learned Relational freedom and the Ilan Pappe case: an anthropological proposal for freedom Give me credit! Microcredit for sustainable development and ethical finance in Rione Sanità, Naples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1