Objects in the photographic archive: Between the field and the museum in Egyptian archaeology

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Museum History Journal Pub Date : 2017-06-15 DOI:10.1080/19369816.2017.1328818
C. Riggs
{"title":"Objects in the photographic archive: Between the field and the museum in Egyptian archaeology","authors":"C. Riggs","doi":"10.1080/19369816.2017.1328818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT From the late nineteenth century, photography was inseparable from archaeological fieldwork, and object photography in particular was crucial to the creation and circulation of the archaeological artefact. Which objects were selected for photography, how they were photographed, and what then happened to both object and photograph: these interrelated aspects of ‘the object habit’ require further interrogation in order to situate the historical acts of knowledge production through which archaeologists, museum curators, and a wider public have apprehended the material remains of the ancient past. In this paper, I draw on examples of object photography in Egyptian archaeology from the 1850s onwards, and in particular, the archive formed during the 1920s excavation of the tomb of Tutankhamun. Like the objects themselves, photographs were destined to circulate between field and museum, and the photographic requirements of these complementary spaces arguably influenced both the ‘look’ of object photographs and the way the photographs were themselves used and catalogued, not only at the time of a given excavation, but subsequently. As this paper argues, colonial-era formations of knowledge about the object endure in the archive, obscuring the social and material practices through which photography operated.","PeriodicalId":52057,"journal":{"name":"Museum History Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19369816.2017.1328818","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Museum History Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19369816.2017.1328818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT From the late nineteenth century, photography was inseparable from archaeological fieldwork, and object photography in particular was crucial to the creation and circulation of the archaeological artefact. Which objects were selected for photography, how they were photographed, and what then happened to both object and photograph: these interrelated aspects of ‘the object habit’ require further interrogation in order to situate the historical acts of knowledge production through which archaeologists, museum curators, and a wider public have apprehended the material remains of the ancient past. In this paper, I draw on examples of object photography in Egyptian archaeology from the 1850s onwards, and in particular, the archive formed during the 1920s excavation of the tomb of Tutankhamun. Like the objects themselves, photographs were destined to circulate between field and museum, and the photographic requirements of these complementary spaces arguably influenced both the ‘look’ of object photographs and the way the photographs were themselves used and catalogued, not only at the time of a given excavation, but subsequently. As this paper argues, colonial-era formations of knowledge about the object endure in the archive, obscuring the social and material practices through which photography operated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
照片档案中的物品:在埃及考古的田野和博物馆之间
摘要从19世纪末开始,摄影就与考古实地工作密不可分,尤其是实物摄影对考古文物的创作和流通至关重要。哪些物体被选择用于摄影,它们是如何被拍摄的,以及物体和照片后来发生了什么:“物体习惯”的这些相互关联的方面需要进一步的询问,以定位考古学家、博物馆馆长和更广泛的公众通过知识生产的历史行为来了解古代的物质遗迹。在这篇论文中,我引用了19世纪50年代以后埃及考古中的实物摄影的例子,特别是20世纪20年代图坦卡蒙墓发掘期间形成的档案。与实物本身一样,照片注定要在田野和博物馆之间流通,这些互补空间的摄影要求可以说影响了实物照片的“外观”以及照片本身的使用和编目方式,不仅在特定的挖掘时,而且在随后。正如本文所说,殖民时代关于物体的知识形成一直存在于档案中,掩盖了摄影所通过的社会和物质实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The toxic museum: Berlin and beyond Money matters: ‘following the money’ to reconstruct Walter Rothschild’s ‘zoological enterprise’ and the history of the Zoological Museum Tring, 1889–1900 Harmful arrangements: Ethnography at the National Institute and racial violence in Washington, D.C., 1842–1864 The museum of the Roman-Christian necropolis of Tarragona in context Civic art galleries and interwar exhibition cultures in Britain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1