Reassessing Syntax-Related ERP Components Using Popular Music Chord Sequences

IF 1.3 2区 心理学 0 MUSIC Music Perception Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1525/mp.2021.39.2.118
Andrew Goldman, Peter M. C. Harrison, Tyreek Jackson, M. Pearce
{"title":"Reassessing Syntax-Related ERP Components Using Popular Music Chord Sequences","authors":"Andrew Goldman, Peter M. C. Harrison, Tyreek Jackson, M. Pearce","doi":"10.1525/mp.2021.39.2.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electroencephalographic responses to unexpected musical events allow researchers to test listeners’ internal models of syntax. One major challenge is dissociating cognitive syntactic violations—based on the abstract identity of a particular musical structure—from unexpected acoustic features. Despite careful controls in past studies, recent work by Bigand, Delbe, Poulin-Carronnat, Leman, and Tillmann (2014) has argued that ERP findings attributed to cognitive surprisal cannot be unequivocally separated from sensory surprisal. Here we report a novel EEG paradigm that uses three auditory short-term memory models and one cognitive model to predict surprisal as indexed by several ERP components (ERAN, N5, P600, and P3a), directly comparing sensory and cognitive contributions. Our paradigm parameterizes a large set of stimuli rather than using categorically “high” and “low” surprisal conditions, addressing issues with past work in which participants may learn where to expect violations and may be biased by local context. The cognitive model (Harrison & Pearce, 2018) predicted higher P3a amplitudes, as did Leman’s (2000) model, indicating both sensory and cognitive contributions to expectation violation. However, no model predicted ERAN, N5, or P600 amplitudes, raising questions about whether traditional interpretations of these ERP components generalize to broader collections of stimuli or rather are limited to less naturalistic stimuli.","PeriodicalId":47786,"journal":{"name":"Music Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2021.39.2.118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electroencephalographic responses to unexpected musical events allow researchers to test listeners’ internal models of syntax. One major challenge is dissociating cognitive syntactic violations—based on the abstract identity of a particular musical structure—from unexpected acoustic features. Despite careful controls in past studies, recent work by Bigand, Delbe, Poulin-Carronnat, Leman, and Tillmann (2014) has argued that ERP findings attributed to cognitive surprisal cannot be unequivocally separated from sensory surprisal. Here we report a novel EEG paradigm that uses three auditory short-term memory models and one cognitive model to predict surprisal as indexed by several ERP components (ERAN, N5, P600, and P3a), directly comparing sensory and cognitive contributions. Our paradigm parameterizes a large set of stimuli rather than using categorically “high” and “low” surprisal conditions, addressing issues with past work in which participants may learn where to expect violations and may be biased by local context. The cognitive model (Harrison & Pearce, 2018) predicted higher P3a amplitudes, as did Leman’s (2000) model, indicating both sensory and cognitive contributions to expectation violation. However, no model predicted ERAN, N5, or P600 amplitudes, raising questions about whether traditional interpretations of these ERP components generalize to broader collections of stimuli or rather are limited to less naturalistic stimuli.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用流行音乐和弦序列重新评估语法相关的ERP组件
对意外音乐事件的脑电图反应使研究人员能够测试听众的内部语法模型。一个主要的挑战是将基于特定音乐结构的抽象身份的认知句法侵犯与意想不到的声学特征分离开来。尽管在过去的研究中进行了仔细的控制,但Bigand、Delbe、Poulin-Carronnat、Leman和Tillmann(2014)最近的工作认为,归因于认知异常的ERP发现不能明确地与感觉异常分开。在这里,我们报告了一种新的EEG范式,该范式使用三个听觉短期记忆模型和一个认知模型来预测由几个ERP成分(ERAN、N5、P600和P3a)索引的异常,直接比较感觉和认知贡献。我们的范式将一大组刺激因素参数化,而不是明确使用“高”和“低”的意外条件,解决了过去工作中的问题,在这些问题中,参与者可能会了解到哪里会出现违规行为,并且可能会因地处环境而产生偏见。认知模型(Harrison&Pearce,2018)预测了更高的P3a振幅,Leman(2000)的模型也是如此,表明感官和认知都对预期违反有贡献。然而,没有模型预测ERAN、N5或P600振幅,这引发了对这些ERP成分的传统解释是推广到更广泛的刺激集合,还是仅限于不太自然的刺激的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Music Perception
Music Perception Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Music Perception charts the ongoing scholarly discussion and study of musical phenomena. Publishing original empirical and theoretical papers, methodological articles and critical reviews from renowned scientists and musicians, Music Perception is a repository of insightful research. The broad range of disciplines covered in the journal includes: •Psychology •Psychophysics •Linguistics •Neurology •Neurophysiology •Artificial intelligence •Computer technology •Physical and architectural acoustics •Music theory
期刊最新文献
The Perceptual and Emotional Consequences of Articulation in Music Cognitive Mechanisms in Temporally Controlled Rhythm Reading No Heightened Musical Pitch Weighting For Tone Language Speakers in Early Childhood Timbre Semantic Associations Vary Both Between and Within Instruments The Whole is Not Different From its Parts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1