From Disparities to Progress: Cultural Reflexivity in Framing Asian American Mental Health Research

Jessica Cho Kim
{"title":"From Disparities to Progress: Cultural Reflexivity in Framing Asian American Mental Health Research","authors":"Jessica Cho Kim","doi":"10.1080/15313204.2021.1913778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the current theory base that is explicit in research to understanding mental health disparities seen among Asian Americans. I will argue that the disparities framework is effectively insufficient due to the epistemological and ontological dominance of “mental illness” and “mental health services” via comparisons to non-Latino whites that is implicit in its methodology. Using a social constructionist conceptual framework as well as a critical discourse analysis, I will explicate the perpetuating limitations of the current disparities research agenda and propose cultural reflexivity in framing future research that may be more equitable and inclusive for Asian American health and well-being.","PeriodicalId":45824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15313204.2021.1913778","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2021.1913778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the current theory base that is explicit in research to understanding mental health disparities seen among Asian Americans. I will argue that the disparities framework is effectively insufficient due to the epistemological and ontological dominance of “mental illness” and “mental health services” via comparisons to non-Latino whites that is implicit in its methodology. Using a social constructionist conceptual framework as well as a critical discourse analysis, I will explicate the perpetuating limitations of the current disparities research agenda and propose cultural reflexivity in framing future research that may be more equitable and inclusive for Asian American health and well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从差异到进步:构建亚裔美国人心理健康研究的文化反身性
摘要本文考察了目前在理解亚裔美国人心理健康差异的研究中明确的理论基础。我认为,由于“精神疾病”和“心理健康服务”在认识论和本体论上的主导地位,通过与非拉丁裔白人的比较,差异框架实际上是不够的,这在其方法论中是隐含的。使用社会建构主义的概念框架和批判性话语分析,我将解释当前差异研究议程的长期局限性,并在制定未来研究时提出文化反思性,这可能对亚裔美国人的健康和福祉更加公平和包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work® is dedicated to the examina­tion of multicultural social issues as they relate to social work policy, research, theory, and practice. The journal helps readers develop knowledge and promote understanding of the impact of culture, ethnicity, and class on the individual, group, organization, and community on the delivery of human services.
期刊最新文献
The intersectionality of race, gender, and low-wage work An incongruence between policy, practice, and cultural values: implications for mental health services in Namibia “El nombre de nuestro país está en nuestros corazones”: exploring the impact of school-based identity messaging in Central American immigrant youth Relationships between acculturative stress, internalized weight stigma, and psychological distress among Asian, Black, and Latinx adults “My children will need to pay it back”: a qualitative testimonio study of Latina immigrant mothers seeking social services for their mixed-status families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1