Measuring Outcomes of Interprofessional Education: A Validation Study of the Self-Assessment of Collaboration Skills Measure

Kaja Braathen
{"title":"Measuring Outcomes of Interprofessional Education: A Validation Study of the Self-Assessment of Collaboration Skills Measure","authors":"Kaja Braathen","doi":"10.7577/pp.4307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased attention is being focused on the need for interprofessional collaboration between professional actors, in various fields. In turn, this creates a demand for validated, context-neutral instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education. The initial validation of one such measure, the Self-Assessment of Collaboration Skills (SACS) measure, has shown promising results in this regard. The aim of this article has been to contribute to the validation process of the SACS measure by presenting the results of a cross-validation of the measure in a sample of Norwegian students (N= 499) attending a children and youth-focused IPE programme. The study's findings both indicated that the measure is quite stable across the different settings and supported the claim that the SACS is a context-neutral instrument—one that is well-suited to measuring collaboration skills in various IPE settings. These findings may prove important for professionals seeking to evaluate IPE programmes with broad study profiles.","PeriodicalId":53464,"journal":{"name":"Professions and Professionalism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professions and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.4307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Increased attention is being focused on the need for interprofessional collaboration between professional actors, in various fields. In turn, this creates a demand for validated, context-neutral instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education. The initial validation of one such measure, the Self-Assessment of Collaboration Skills (SACS) measure, has shown promising results in this regard. The aim of this article has been to contribute to the validation process of the SACS measure by presenting the results of a cross-validation of the measure in a sample of Norwegian students (N= 499) attending a children and youth-focused IPE programme. The study's findings both indicated that the measure is quite stable across the different settings and supported the claim that the SACS is a context-neutral instrument—one that is well-suited to measuring collaboration skills in various IPE settings. These findings may prove important for professionals seeking to evaluate IPE programmes with broad study profiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨专业教育的测量结果:协作技能量表自评的验证研究
人们越来越关注各领域专业行为者之间跨专业合作的必要性。反过来,这就产生了对经过验证的、与背景无关的工具的需求,以衡量跨专业教育的结果。其中一项措施,即协作技能自我评估(SACS)措施的初步验证,在这方面显示出了有希望的结果。本文的目的是通过在参加以儿童和青年为重点的IPE项目的挪威学生样本(N=499)中展示该措施的交叉验证结果,为SACS措施的验证过程做出贡献。该研究的结果表明,该测量在不同的环境中都相当稳定,并支持SACS是一种上下文中立的工具的说法,它非常适合测量各种IPE环境中的协作技能。这些发现可能对寻求评估具有广泛研究概况的IPE计划的专业人士很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Professions and Professionalism
Professions and Professionalism Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Professions and Professionalism (P&P) is an open-access, net-based, peer-reviewed and English-language journal. The Journal invites research-based empirical, theoretical or synoptic articles focusing on traditional professions as well as other knowledge-based occupational groups approached from any perspective or discipline. By prioritizing no single theoretical horizon or methodological approach, the journal creates a space for the development of the research field. Aims: To develop the study of professions and professionalism theoretically and empirically, To contribute to the development of the study of professions and professionalism as an international interdisciplinary field of research, To become an important publication channel for the international research community.
期刊最新文献
School Counsellors’ Professional Practice in Health Promotion, Prevention and Remedial Work in Swedish Schools Professional Regulation and Change in Times of Crisis: Differing Opportunities Within and Across Ecologies The Enactment of Professional Boundary Work: A Case Study of Crime Investigation Editorial: The Research Literacy of Teachers Educational Research Literacy: Philosophical Foundations and Empirical Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1