Detecting Environmental Contamination of MRSA in Ambulances: A Novel and Efficient Sampling Methodology

R. Orellana, A. Hoet, J. V. van Balen, Bo Lu, Christina Kelley, K. Stevenson
{"title":"Detecting Environmental Contamination of MRSA in Ambulances: A Novel and Efficient Sampling Methodology","authors":"R. Orellana, A. Hoet, J. V. van Balen, Bo Lu, Christina Kelley, K. Stevenson","doi":"10.18061/ojph.v3i2.9012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be found in emergency medical services (EMS) ambulances. This poses an occupational risk and patient safety hazard. Screening for environmental contamination is often not performed due to limited resources and logistical challenges. This study’s objective was to compare traditional screening of individual surfaces versus “pooled sampling” to efficiently identify contamination. \nMethods: A cross-sectional study, conducted among 145 Ohio EMS ambulances from 84 agencies, tested a novel pooled sampling methodology to detect MRSA contaminated ambulances. For ambulances screened using pooled sampling, 3 samples were collected within each ambulance. Pool One included cabinets, doorways, and ceiling bar. Pool Two included cot, seats, and backboard. Pool Three included steering wheel, kits, and clipboard. For ambulances screened with the traditional detection technique, each of the 9 aforementioned surfaces were sampled individually. Descriptive statistics and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated to compare the 2 methods. \nResults: Forty-seven of 145 ambulances (32.4%) had at least 1 of the 9 locations contaminated with MRSA. When comparing the 2 screening methodologies, no significant difference was observed regarding the overall detection of MRSA contaminated ambulances (24/60 [40%] versus 23/85 [27.6%], P value: 0.1000). This indicates that pooled sampling appears as an efficient method for identification of MRSA contaminated ambulances. \nConclusion: One-third of Ohio ambulances had MRSA contamination in this study. Therefore, an efficient methodology to identify contaminated ambulances with hazardous pathogens is incredibly valuable. Pooling can help save resources and simplify sampling logistics, all which could positively impact infection control practices in emergency medical services.","PeriodicalId":74337,"journal":{"name":"Ohio journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ojph.v3i2.9012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be found in emergency medical services (EMS) ambulances. This poses an occupational risk and patient safety hazard. Screening for environmental contamination is often not performed due to limited resources and logistical challenges. This study’s objective was to compare traditional screening of individual surfaces versus “pooled sampling” to efficiently identify contamination. Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted among 145 Ohio EMS ambulances from 84 agencies, tested a novel pooled sampling methodology to detect MRSA contaminated ambulances. For ambulances screened using pooled sampling, 3 samples were collected within each ambulance. Pool One included cabinets, doorways, and ceiling bar. Pool Two included cot, seats, and backboard. Pool Three included steering wheel, kits, and clipboard. For ambulances screened with the traditional detection technique, each of the 9 aforementioned surfaces were sampled individually. Descriptive statistics and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated to compare the 2 methods. Results: Forty-seven of 145 ambulances (32.4%) had at least 1 of the 9 locations contaminated with MRSA. When comparing the 2 screening methodologies, no significant difference was observed regarding the overall detection of MRSA contaminated ambulances (24/60 [40%] versus 23/85 [27.6%], P value: 0.1000). This indicates that pooled sampling appears as an efficient method for identification of MRSA contaminated ambulances. Conclusion: One-third of Ohio ambulances had MRSA contamination in this study. Therefore, an efficient methodology to identify contaminated ambulances with hazardous pathogens is incredibly valuable. Pooling can help save resources and simplify sampling logistics, all which could positively impact infection control practices in emergency medical services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测救护车中MRSA的环境污染:一种新颖有效的采样方法
背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)可在紧急医疗服务(EMS)救护车中发现。这构成了职业风险和患者安全隐患。由于资源有限和后勤方面的挑战,通常不进行环境污染筛查。本研究的目的是比较传统的单个表面筛选与“集中采样”,以有效地识别污染。方法:对来自84家机构的145辆俄亥俄州EMS救护车进行了一项横断面研究,测试了一种新的汇集抽样方法来检测MRSA污染的救护车。对于采用集中抽样筛选的救护车,每辆救护车内采集3个样本。一号泳池包括橱柜、门廊和天花板酒吧。二池包括帆布床、座椅和篮板。第三组包括方向盘、套件和剪贴板。对于使用传统检测技术筛选的救护车,分别对上述9个表面进行采样。计算描述性统计和未调整和调整的优势比(OR)来比较两种方法。结果:145辆救护车中有47辆(32.4%)至少有1处感染了MRSA。在比较两种筛查方法时,MRSA污染救护车的总体检出率无显著差异(24/60 [40%]vs 23/85 [27.6%], P值:0.1000)。这表明,集中抽样似乎是一种有效的方法,以确定MRSA污染的救护车。结论:在这项研究中,俄亥俄州三分之一的救护车被MRSA污染。因此,一种有效的方法来识别有危险病原体的污染救护车是非常有价值的。集中可以帮助节省资源和简化采样后勤,所有这些都可以对紧急医疗服务中的感染控制实践产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Issues in Ohio Availability and Characteristics of Hemp-Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Products: A Pilot Study in Cleveland, Ohio Application of The Healthy Migrant Theory to Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Data in Ohio How Can Public Health Professionals Help to Improve Mental Health for Students Using Distance Learning? Aging in Ohio: Trends and Preparation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1