High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet*

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2022-04-02 DOI:10.1111/1467-8489.12472
Matthias Staudigel, Aleksej Trubnikov
{"title":"High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet*","authors":"Matthias Staudigel,&nbsp;Aleksej Trubnikov","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rigid price setting and high organic price premiums have been perceived as major purchase barriers to organic meat products. While emerging price and product differentiation have been reported for organic products in other categories, empirical evidence for the organic fresh meat market is lacking. We estimate a hedonic pricing model based on German household scanner data for fresh red meat and poultry purchases from 2012 to 2014. We derive and test for differences in organic price premiums across distribution channels, species and product type. Our results indicate significant variation in organic premiums, which range from 14 per cent for minced beef to 108 per cent for chicken breasts, and are considerably lower than previously reported estimates. We also find substantial overlaps in the distributions of conventional and organic prices for selected products. Our results suggest that high price premiums can no longer serve as the dominant explanation for low market shares of organic red meat. Marketers and policymakers may instead communicate the benefits of organic meat over conventional premium alternatives more clearly or increase the availability of organic meat.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"66 2","pages":"309-334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12472","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Rigid price setting and high organic price premiums have been perceived as major purchase barriers to organic meat products. While emerging price and product differentiation have been reported for organic products in other categories, empirical evidence for the organic fresh meat market is lacking. We estimate a hedonic pricing model based on German household scanner data for fresh red meat and poultry purchases from 2012 to 2014. We derive and test for differences in organic price premiums across distribution channels, species and product type. Our results indicate significant variation in organic premiums, which range from 14 per cent for minced beef to 108 per cent for chicken breasts, and are considerably lower than previously reported estimates. We also find substantial overlaps in the distributions of conventional and organic prices for selected products. Our results suggest that high price premiums can no longer serve as the dominant explanation for low market shares of organic red meat. Marketers and policymakers may instead communicate the benefits of organic meat over conventional premium alternatives more clearly or increase the availability of organic meat.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高价溢价是有机肉类需求的障碍?考虑品种、切割和零售渠道的享乐分析*
僵化的价格设定和高有机价格溢价被认为是购买有机肉制品的主要障碍。虽然其他类别的有机产品出现了价格和产品差异,但有机鲜肉市场缺乏经验证据。我们基于2012年至2014年德国家庭扫描数据估算了新鲜红肉和家禽采购的享乐定价模型。我们推导并检验了不同分销渠道、品种和产品类型的有机价格溢价差异。我们的结果表明,有机溢价存在显著差异,从碎牛肉的14%到鸡胸肉的108%不等,远低于之前报道的估计。我们还发现在选定产品的传统和有机价格分布中存在大量重叠。我们的研究结果表明,高价溢价不能再作为有机红肉低市场份额的主要解释。营销人员和政策制定者可能会更清楚地宣传有机肉类比传统优质替代品的好处,或者增加有机肉类的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Measuring quantity in ecosystem markets and ecosystem accounts Electricity contract design and wholesale market outcomes in Australia's National Electricity Market Beyond risk management: Crop insurance premium subsidies reduce cropland abandonment in China Effect of dependence on natural resources on employment quality: Insights from African countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1