Efficacy of treatment intensity in German-speaking children with childhood apraxia of speech

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Child Language Teaching & Therapy Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.1177/02656590211035156
Sabine Leonhartsberger, E. Huber, German Brandstötter, R. Stoeckel, Becky S. Baas, C. Weber, D. Holzinger
{"title":"Efficacy of treatment intensity in German-speaking children with childhood apraxia of speech","authors":"Sabine Leonhartsberger, E. Huber, German Brandstötter, R. Stoeckel, Becky S. Baas, C. Weber, D. Holzinger","doi":"10.1177/02656590211035156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motor learning principles guide treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Previous studies found children to benefit from higher-intensity conditions; however, they did not control for the total amount of therapy time. The aims of the article are to examine the effects of high versus low treatment frequency in intervention for CAS in German-speaking children. An alternating single-subject design with multiple baselines was applied to compare frequent, short sessions with fewer, longer sessions in terms of speech production accuracy in four children with CAS while keeping the total therapy time constant. We administered a version of integral stimulation treatment. Despite inter-individual differences, changes under both treatment conditions showed similar positive trajectories for all four children. Untreated control targets also improved across participants and conditions. Maintenance and generalization to untreated targets were observed two weeks and three months post treatment, independent of treatment intensity. Our results show no significant advantage of more intensive treatment when the total therapy time is held constant. This study contributes to the evidence base for the use of integral stimulation in treating children with CAS, and in particular those who speak languages other than English.","PeriodicalId":46549,"journal":{"name":"Child Language Teaching & Therapy","volume":"38 1","pages":"43 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Language Teaching & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656590211035156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Motor learning principles guide treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Previous studies found children to benefit from higher-intensity conditions; however, they did not control for the total amount of therapy time. The aims of the article are to examine the effects of high versus low treatment frequency in intervention for CAS in German-speaking children. An alternating single-subject design with multiple baselines was applied to compare frequent, short sessions with fewer, longer sessions in terms of speech production accuracy in four children with CAS while keeping the total therapy time constant. We administered a version of integral stimulation treatment. Despite inter-individual differences, changes under both treatment conditions showed similar positive trajectories for all four children. Untreated control targets also improved across participants and conditions. Maintenance and generalization to untreated targets were observed two weeks and three months post treatment, independent of treatment intensity. Our results show no significant advantage of more intensive treatment when the total therapy time is held constant. This study contributes to the evidence base for the use of integral stimulation in treating children with CAS, and in particular those who speak languages other than English.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强度治疗对德语儿童言语失用的疗效观察
运动学习原理指导儿童言语失用症的治疗。先前的研究发现,儿童从高强度的环境中受益;然而,他们并没有控制治疗的总时间。这篇文章的目的是检查高与低治疗频率对德语儿童CAS干预的影响。在保持总治疗时间不变的情况下,采用具有多个基线的交替单受试者设计,比较四名CAS患儿频繁、短疗程与较少、长疗程的言语产生准确性。我们进行了一种综合刺激治疗。尽管个体间存在差异,但在两种治疗条件下的变化对所有四个孩子都显示出相似的积极轨迹。未经治疗的控制目标在参与者和条件方面也有所改善。治疗后2周和3个月观察未治疗目标的维持和推广情况,与治疗强度无关。我们的结果显示,当总治疗时间保持不变时,更强化的治疗没有显著的优势。本研究为使用整体刺激治疗CAS儿童,特别是那些说非英语语言的儿童提供了证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Child Language Teaching and Therapy is an international peer reviewed journal which aims to be the leading inter-disciplinary journal in the field of children"s spoken and written language needs. The journal publishes original research and review articles of high practical relevance and which emphasise inter-disciplinary collaboration. Child Language Teaching and Therapy publishes regular special issues on specific subject areas and commissions keynote reviews of significant topics. The readership of the journal consists of academics and practitioners across the disciplines of education, speech and language therapy, psychology and linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Notes on contributors A speech-to-symbol app for supporting communication partner to model and improve vocabulary Explicit cognate instruction facilitates vocabulary learning by foreign language learners with developmental language disorder ‘They make it easier to learn and cope’: The views of adolescents with speech, language and communication needs on attending a flexible learning programme Effectiveness of a group intervention for lexical enrichment in 6-to-10-year-old children with developmental language disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1