Efficacies of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia

Jun Chen, Y. Ling, X. Xi, Ping Liu, Feng Li, Tao Li, Zhiyin Shang, Mei Wang, Yinzhong Shen, Hongzhou Lu
{"title":"Efficacies of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia","authors":"Jun Chen, Y. Ling, X. Xi, Ping Liu, Feng Li, Tao Li, Zhiyin Shang, Mei Wang, Yinzhong Shen, Hongzhou Lu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6680.2020.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the efficacies of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol in the treatment of novel covonavirus pneumonia (NCP). \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 134 patients with NCP receiving treatment at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center during January 20 to February 6, 2020 were retrospectively collected. All the patients received interferon-α2b spray and symptomatic supportive treatment, and 52 cases received oral lopinavir/ritonavir treatment, 34 cases received oral abidol treatment, the remaining 48 cases did not take any antiviral drugs. The efficacies of the three groups were compared, and Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThe 134 patients included 69 males (51.5%) and 65 females (48.5%), aged 35 to 62 years with the average of 48 years. The median time to temperature normalization in patients receiving abidol or lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was both six days after admission, and that was four days in the control group, with no significant difference (χ2=2.37, P=0.31). The median time for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative in the respiratory specimens in the three groups was all seven days after admission, and the PCR negative rates at day seven after admission in lopinavir/ritonavir, abidol and control groups were 71.8% (28/39), 82.6% (19/23) and 77.1% (27/35), respectively, which were not significantly different (χ2=0.46, P=0.79). Radiological worsening at day seven was observed in comparable proportions of patients in the three groups, which were 42.3% (22/52), 35.3% (12/34) and 52.1% (25/48), respectively(χ2=2.38, P=0.30). Adverse reactions occurred in 17.3% (9/52), 8.8% (3/34) and 8.3% (4/48) patients, respectively in the three groups (χ2=2.33, P=0.33). \n \n \nConclusions \nThis study does not find any effects of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol on relieving symptoms or accelerating virus clearance. The efficacies of these two drugs in NCP treatment need further investigation. \n \n \nKey words: \nCoronavirus infections; Pneumonia; Validation studies; 2019 novel coronavirus; Lopinavir/ritonavir; Abidol","PeriodicalId":10127,"journal":{"name":"中华传染病杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华传染病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6680.2020.02.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacies of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol in the treatment of novel covonavirus pneumonia (NCP). Methods The clinical data of 134 patients with NCP receiving treatment at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center during January 20 to February 6, 2020 were retrospectively collected. All the patients received interferon-α2b spray and symptomatic supportive treatment, and 52 cases received oral lopinavir/ritonavir treatment, 34 cases received oral abidol treatment, the remaining 48 cases did not take any antiviral drugs. The efficacies of the three groups were compared, and Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results The 134 patients included 69 males (51.5%) and 65 females (48.5%), aged 35 to 62 years with the average of 48 years. The median time to temperature normalization in patients receiving abidol or lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was both six days after admission, and that was four days in the control group, with no significant difference (χ2=2.37, P=0.31). The median time for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative in the respiratory specimens in the three groups was all seven days after admission, and the PCR negative rates at day seven after admission in lopinavir/ritonavir, abidol and control groups were 71.8% (28/39), 82.6% (19/23) and 77.1% (27/35), respectively, which were not significantly different (χ2=0.46, P=0.79). Radiological worsening at day seven was observed in comparable proportions of patients in the three groups, which were 42.3% (22/52), 35.3% (12/34) and 52.1% (25/48), respectively(χ2=2.38, P=0.30). Adverse reactions occurred in 17.3% (9/52), 8.8% (3/34) and 8.3% (4/48) patients, respectively in the three groups (χ2=2.33, P=0.33). Conclusions This study does not find any effects of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol on relieving symptoms or accelerating virus clearance. The efficacies of these two drugs in NCP treatment need further investigation. Key words: Coronavirus infections; Pneumonia; Validation studies; 2019 novel coronavirus; Lopinavir/ritonavir; Abidol
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洛匹那韦/利托那韦和阿比多尔治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效
目的评价洛匹那韦/利托那韦和阿比多尔治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效。方法回顾性收集2020年1月20日至2月6日在上海市公共卫生临床中心接受治疗的134例新冠肺炎患者的临床资料。所有患者均接受干扰素-α2b喷雾和症状支持治疗,52例接受口服洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗,34例接受口服阿比多尔治疗,其余48例未服用任何抗病毒药物。比较三组疗效,采用卡方检验进行统计学分析。结果134例患者中男性69例(51.5%),女性65例(48.5%),年龄35~62岁,平均48岁。接受阿比多尔或洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的患者体温正常化的中位时间均为入院后6天,对照组为4天,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.37,P=0.31),洛匹那韦/利托那韦、阿比多尔和对照组入院后第7天的PCR阴性率分别为71.8%(28/39)、82.6%(19/23)和77.1%(27/35),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.46,P=0.79),三组不良反应发生率分别为17.3%(9/52)、8.8%(3/34)和8.3%(4/48)(χ2=2.33,P=0.033)。这两种药物治疗新冠肺炎的疗效有待进一步研究。关键词:冠状病毒感染;肺炎;验证研究;2019新型冠状病毒;洛匹那韦/利托那韦;阿比多尔
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5280
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Morphological characteristics of lung tissue in two cases with critical corona virus disease 2019 Establishing emergency medical system of classified treatment to alleviate the overload medical needs after the community outbreak of corona virus disease 2019 in Wuhan City Clinical analysis of nine cases with critical corona virus disease 2019 in Hainan province/ 中华传染病杂志 Clinical analysis of risk factors for severe patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia Exploration of digestive tract symptoms causesd by the novel coronavirus infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1