Diagnostic ability of bedside lung Ultrasound in neonates with respiratory distress

Aakash Pandita
{"title":"Diagnostic ability of bedside lung Ultrasound in neonates with respiratory distress","authors":"Aakash Pandita","doi":"10.15406/jpnc.2018.08.00364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respiratory distress accounts for almost 40% of admissions to Neonatal intensive care unit.1 The respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and transient tachypnea of Newborn (TTN) are the most common cause of respiratory distress in the preterm and term neonates respectively.2 Chest X-rays are the cornerstone for the diagnosis of respiratory distress (RD). However, distinguishing RDS and TTN may be difficult during the first 24h after birth. Besides, x-rays are not safe for a newborn who is still undergoing maturation. Chest radiography is still the investigation of choice to evaluate the cause of RD in the neonates. However radiography findings are not always diagnostic, it has been shown to be inaccurate in many situations.3 In addition, chest X-ray itself has a wide intraand inter-observer variability and requires expensive equipment. The adverse effects of irradiation are higher among the Neonates and may be more pronounced in preterms.4 The potential weakness of bedside radiography is explainable by its principle: three dimensions are reduced to two. A CT scan could resolve many of these issues but involves transporting potentially unstable patients out of the department, larger radiation doses (typically 200 times that of a CXR), and the use of contrast makes it unsuitable for routine use in neonates. To circumvent these limitations, ultrasound lung may be a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of RD in newborns. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in the evaluation of RDS and TTN in comparison to clinical and chest X ray diagnosis","PeriodicalId":92678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics & neonatal care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics & neonatal care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jpnc.2018.08.00364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Respiratory distress accounts for almost 40% of admissions to Neonatal intensive care unit.1 The respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and transient tachypnea of Newborn (TTN) are the most common cause of respiratory distress in the preterm and term neonates respectively.2 Chest X-rays are the cornerstone for the diagnosis of respiratory distress (RD). However, distinguishing RDS and TTN may be difficult during the first 24h after birth. Besides, x-rays are not safe for a newborn who is still undergoing maturation. Chest radiography is still the investigation of choice to evaluate the cause of RD in the neonates. However radiography findings are not always diagnostic, it has been shown to be inaccurate in many situations.3 In addition, chest X-ray itself has a wide intraand inter-observer variability and requires expensive equipment. The adverse effects of irradiation are higher among the Neonates and may be more pronounced in preterms.4 The potential weakness of bedside radiography is explainable by its principle: three dimensions are reduced to two. A CT scan could resolve many of these issues but involves transporting potentially unstable patients out of the department, larger radiation doses (typically 200 times that of a CXR), and the use of contrast makes it unsuitable for routine use in neonates. To circumvent these limitations, ultrasound lung may be a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of RD in newborns. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in the evaluation of RDS and TTN in comparison to clinical and chest X ray diagnosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
床边肺超声对新生儿呼吸窘迫的诊断价值
呼吸窘迫占新生儿重症监护病房入院人数的近40% 1呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)和新生儿短暂性呼吸急促(TTN)分别是早产儿和足月新生儿最常见的呼吸窘迫原因胸部x光片是诊断呼吸窘迫(RD)的基础。然而,在出生后的最初24小时内,区分RDS和TTN可能很困难。此外,x光对仍在发育中的新生儿是不安全的。胸片仍是评估新生儿RD病因的首选调查方法。然而,x线摄影结果并不总是诊断性的,在许多情况下,它已被证明是不准确的此外,胸部x光本身在观察者内部和观察者之间具有很大的可变性,并且需要昂贵的设备。辐照的不良影响在新生儿中较高,在早产儿中可能更为明显床边放射照相的潜在弱点可以用它的原理来解释:三维被简化为二维。CT扫描可以解决许多这些问题,但需要将潜在不稳定的患者转移到科室外,辐射剂量较大(通常是CXR的200倍),并且使用造影剂使其不适合常规用于新生儿。为了规避这些限制,超声肺可能是新生儿RD鉴别诊断的有用工具。本研究的目的是确定LUS在评估RDS和TTN时的诊断准确性,并与临床和X线胸片诊断进行比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empowering the LMIC hinterlands with compatible technologies for neonatal care – the resilience of a research group Adolescents health issues in India Childhood onset SLE- case report Persistent air leak (bronchopleural fistula) in neonates Prevalence of hearing impairment and outcome of universal neonatal hearing screening program in a tertiary care hospital – in UAE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1