The Right to Freedom of Association for Public and Private Sector Employees in Zimbabwe in the Context of International Labour Organisation Standards

Noah Maringe, Mpfari Budeli-Nemakonde
{"title":"The Right to Freedom of Association for Public and Private Sector Employees in Zimbabwe in the Context of International Labour Organisation Standards","authors":"Noah Maringe, Mpfari Budeli-Nemakonde","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/11107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the right of employees to freedom of association in Zimbabwe. It adopts a comparative analysis with the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) standards on freedom of association. In order to achieve this, lessons are drawn from South African labour law and practice since Zimbabwe’s constitutional provisions on freedom of association are similar to those of South Africa. It begins by discussing important sources of the right to freedom of association under the ILO framework which includes relevant Conventions. Zimbabwe adopted a new constitution in 2013 which incorporates the right of employees to freedom of association and all its components under the Declaration of Rights. This is a significant point of departure in analysing the extent to which Zimbabwe complies with its ILO obligations on freedom of association. The constitution applies to both public and private sector employees. However, pieces of legislation which give effect to the constitutional right to freedom of association create a two-tier labour relations system where public sector employees have different laws which govern them. On the other hand, private sector employees fall under the Labour Act. This necessitates a separate consideration of the key provisions which have a direct impact on the enjoyment of the right of employees to freedom of association in Zimbabwe in order to test their constitutionality.","PeriodicalId":29899,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/11107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the right of employees to freedom of association in Zimbabwe. It adopts a comparative analysis with the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) standards on freedom of association. In order to achieve this, lessons are drawn from South African labour law and practice since Zimbabwe’s constitutional provisions on freedom of association are similar to those of South Africa. It begins by discussing important sources of the right to freedom of association under the ILO framework which includes relevant Conventions. Zimbabwe adopted a new constitution in 2013 which incorporates the right of employees to freedom of association and all its components under the Declaration of Rights. This is a significant point of departure in analysing the extent to which Zimbabwe complies with its ILO obligations on freedom of association. The constitution applies to both public and private sector employees. However, pieces of legislation which give effect to the constitutional right to freedom of association create a two-tier labour relations system where public sector employees have different laws which govern them. On the other hand, private sector employees fall under the Labour Act. This necessitates a separate consideration of the key provisions which have a direct impact on the enjoyment of the right of employees to freedom of association in Zimbabwe in order to test their constitutionality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际劳工组织标准下津巴布韦公共和私营部门雇员的结社自由权
本条涉及津巴布韦雇员结社自由的权利。它采用了与国际劳工组织(劳工组织)关于结社自由的标准的比较分析。为了实现这一点,我们从南非劳工法和实践中吸取了教训,因为津巴布韦关于结社自由的宪法规定与南非类似。它首先讨论了在包括相关公约在内的劳工组织框架下结社自由权的重要来源。津巴布韦于2013年通过了一部新宪法,将雇员的结社自由权及其所有组成部分纳入《权利宣言》。这是分析津巴布韦在多大程度上遵守劳工组织关于结社自由的义务的一个重要出发点。宪法适用于公共部门和私营部门的雇员。然而,实施宪法规定的结社自由权的立法建立了一个双层劳动关系体系,公共部门雇员有不同的法律来管理他们。另一方面,私营部门雇员受《劳动法》管辖。这就需要单独审议对津巴布韦雇员享有结社自由权有直接影响的关键条款,以检验其合宪性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Corporate Social Responsibility as an Enabler of Socio-economic Restoration in Post-COVID-19 Business Environment in South Africa and Nigeria International Law’s Specialised Regime and Normative Conflict: A Reflection on International Criminal Law Accommodating New Modes of Work in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Ghana: Some Comparative Lessons from the United Kingdom and South Africa A Flexible Approach to Enabling the Free Movement of People in Southern Africa Evaluating the Individual Criminal Responsibility of Gukurahundi Perpetrators under International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1