"The Uncontrollability of Real Things": Operation Shylock, Sabbath's Theater, and Philip Roth's Falstaffian Theology of Judaism

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philip Roth Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-16 DOI:10.1353/prs.2020.0013
D. Goodman
{"title":"\"The Uncontrollability of Real Things\": Operation Shylock, Sabbath's Theater, and Philip Roth's Falstaffian Theology of Judaism","authors":"D. Goodman","doi":"10.1353/prs.2020.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Philip Roth's engagement with William Shakespeare has been a steady and intense career-long affair. Hermione Lee, in remarks delivered on the occasion of Roth's eightieth birthday, observed that Roth's use of Shakespeare extends at least as far back as Portnoy's Complaint (1969). \"Roth has Shakespeare deep in his head,\" Lee averred, and of this there can be no doubt. What can be questioned, however, is the upward-charting trajectory of Roth's use of Shakespeare. Even a cursory reading of Roth reveals that the more he aged, and the more his career progressed, the more he invoked Shakespeare, demonstrated in the series of novels beginning with Operation Shylock (1993), crescendoing in Sabbath's Theater (1995), and culminating in Exit Ghost (2007) and The Humbling (2009). Roth's greater use of Shakespeare in the later stages of his career—greater in the dual senses of frequency and engagement—can be ascribed, this article argues, to Roth's growing involvement with Jewish identity and human mortality.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2020.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Philip Roth's engagement with William Shakespeare has been a steady and intense career-long affair. Hermione Lee, in remarks delivered on the occasion of Roth's eightieth birthday, observed that Roth's use of Shakespeare extends at least as far back as Portnoy's Complaint (1969). "Roth has Shakespeare deep in his head," Lee averred, and of this there can be no doubt. What can be questioned, however, is the upward-charting trajectory of Roth's use of Shakespeare. Even a cursory reading of Roth reveals that the more he aged, and the more his career progressed, the more he invoked Shakespeare, demonstrated in the series of novels beginning with Operation Shylock (1993), crescendoing in Sabbath's Theater (1995), and culminating in Exit Ghost (2007) and The Humbling (2009). Roth's greater use of Shakespeare in the later stages of his career—greater in the dual senses of frequency and engagement—can be ascribed, this article argues, to Roth's growing involvement with Jewish identity and human mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“真实事物的不可控制性”:夏洛克行动,安息日的剧院,和菲利普罗斯的犹太教法斯塔夫神学
摘要:菲利普•罗斯与威廉•莎士比亚的订婚经历了一段稳定而紧张的职业生涯。赫敏·李在罗斯八十岁生日之际发表的讲话中指出,罗斯对莎士比亚的使用至少可以追溯到1969年波特诺伊的《控诉》。李断言:“罗斯的脑海里有莎士比亚的影子。”这一点毋庸置疑。然而,可以质疑的是罗斯使用莎士比亚的上升轨迹。即使粗略地阅读一下罗斯,也会发现他年龄越大,事业越进步,他就越能引用莎士比亚的作品,这在从《夏洛克行动》(1993年)开始的一系列小说中表现出来,在《安息日剧院》(1995年)中表现得越来越强烈,在《退出幽灵》(2007年)和《谦卑》(2009年)中达到顶峰。这篇文章认为,罗斯在其职业生涯的后期更多地使用莎士比亚,在频率和参与度的双重意义上,这可以归因于罗斯越来越多地参与犹太人身份和人类死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors' Note: Traveling with Roth Philip Roth and "My American Gang" In Medias Res Roth and Reputation versus Sex and Empowerment in The Dying Animal Hauntologies of Fiction: Reading Roth at the End of History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1