A meeting of the minds: Broadening horizons in the study of linguistic discrimination and social justice through sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic approaches

IF 2.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Annual Review of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S0267190521000131
Rachel Elizabeth Weissler
{"title":"A meeting of the minds: Broadening horizons in the study of linguistic discrimination and social justice through sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic approaches","authors":"Rachel Elizabeth Weissler","doi":"10.1017/S0267190521000131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract 1 Understanding social justice as it relates to linguistic discrimination and identity requires consideration of both production and perception. As linguists and cognitive psychologists become more attuned to talking about social justice, the need to discuss linguistic human behaviors through a sociocognitive lens becomes more pertinent than ever. This article offers a sociocognitive approach to linguistic analysis as a means to combat linguistic discrimination in the pursuit of social justice. Having negative ideologies about a particular group of people, especially a minoritized group, influences linguistic prediction and perceptions. Together, sociolinguistic and psychological methodologies are necessary to navigate a world in which people use linguistic knowledge to make decisions and predictions about their interlocutors. I use sociocognitive approaches as vehicles for social justice, centering African American English and Anti-Black Racism. The limited existing sociocognitive linguistic research indicates that listeners may modulate their linguistic expectations during cognitive processing based on speaker identity and stereotypes of speakers. As linguistic discrimination is ever-present in U.S. society, in addition to describing sociocognitive solutions, this article also represents a call to action for researchers to empirically test ideological claims about linguistic varieties that are passively accepted, strengthen replicability, and broaden approaches to the study of minoritized varieties more generally. Hopefully, this article will inspire linguistics researchers to consider all factors, cognitive and social, related to linguistic perception, further contributing to a greater understanding of how to combat linguistic discrimination from a multidimensional frame. Abstract 2 (For Family and Friends) The everyday person knows a lot about language. As we use language, interact with it, and listen to it we also naturally make judgments about what we hear. Unfortunately, some of these judgments are negative, especially when it comes to Black people's use of language. Not everyone is heard the same way, believe it or not, even if they are using the same words and cadences. Linguists call this “linguistic discrimination,” which means people are judged for what they say based on how they say it. So, what I'm doing as a researcher is suggesting ways in which people who study these phenomena can better understand them by pulling knowledge from multiple areas: another side that knows the social mechanics of how people use language and another that better understands the mental (cognitive) processes of language. I will define linguistic discrimination and give some brief history of linguistics as a field. I hope my work inspires other researchers to incorporate all of the factors at play, cognitive and social, in their work on language, linguistic discrimination, and social justice.","PeriodicalId":47490,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190521000131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract 1 Understanding social justice as it relates to linguistic discrimination and identity requires consideration of both production and perception. As linguists and cognitive psychologists become more attuned to talking about social justice, the need to discuss linguistic human behaviors through a sociocognitive lens becomes more pertinent than ever. This article offers a sociocognitive approach to linguistic analysis as a means to combat linguistic discrimination in the pursuit of social justice. Having negative ideologies about a particular group of people, especially a minoritized group, influences linguistic prediction and perceptions. Together, sociolinguistic and psychological methodologies are necessary to navigate a world in which people use linguistic knowledge to make decisions and predictions about their interlocutors. I use sociocognitive approaches as vehicles for social justice, centering African American English and Anti-Black Racism. The limited existing sociocognitive linguistic research indicates that listeners may modulate their linguistic expectations during cognitive processing based on speaker identity and stereotypes of speakers. As linguistic discrimination is ever-present in U.S. society, in addition to describing sociocognitive solutions, this article also represents a call to action for researchers to empirically test ideological claims about linguistic varieties that are passively accepted, strengthen replicability, and broaden approaches to the study of minoritized varieties more generally. Hopefully, this article will inspire linguistics researchers to consider all factors, cognitive and social, related to linguistic perception, further contributing to a greater understanding of how to combat linguistic discrimination from a multidimensional frame. Abstract 2 (For Family and Friends) The everyday person knows a lot about language. As we use language, interact with it, and listen to it we also naturally make judgments about what we hear. Unfortunately, some of these judgments are negative, especially when it comes to Black people's use of language. Not everyone is heard the same way, believe it or not, even if they are using the same words and cadences. Linguists call this “linguistic discrimination,” which means people are judged for what they say based on how they say it. So, what I'm doing as a researcher is suggesting ways in which people who study these phenomena can better understand them by pulling knowledge from multiple areas: another side that knows the social mechanics of how people use language and another that better understands the mental (cognitive) processes of language. I will define linguistic discrimination and give some brief history of linguistics as a field. I hope my work inspires other researchers to incorporate all of the factors at play, cognitive and social, in their work on language, linguistic discrimination, and social justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心灵的交汇:通过社会语言学和心理语言学方法拓宽语言歧视和社会正义研究的视野
摘要1理解与语言歧视和身份认同有关的社会正义需要同时考虑生产和感知。随着语言学家和认知心理学家越来越习惯于谈论社会正义,从社会认知的角度讨论人类语言行为的必要性变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。本文提供了一种社会认知的语言分析方法,作为在追求社会正义的过程中打击语言歧视的一种手段。对某一特定群体,尤其是少数民族群体,持有负面意识形态会影响语言预测和认知。社会语言学和心理学方法论是驾驭一个人们利用语言知识对对话者做出决定和预测的世界所必需的。我使用社会认知方法作为社会正义的工具,以非裔美国人英语和反黑人种族主义为中心。现有的有限的社会认知语言学研究表明,听众在认知过程中可能会基于说话人身份和对说话人的刻板印象来调节他们的语言期望。由于语言歧视在美国社会中一直存在,除了描述社会认知解决方案外,这篇文章还呼吁研究人员采取行动,对被动接受的语言变体的意识形态主张进行实证测试,加强可复制性,并更广泛地拓宽对少数民族变体的研究方法。希望这篇文章能激励语言学研究人员考虑与语言感知相关的所有因素,包括认知和社会因素,进一步有助于从多维的角度更好地理解如何打击语言歧视。摘要2(给家人和朋友)普通人对语言了解很多。当我们使用语言、与语言互动和倾听语言时,我们也会自然而然地对所听到的做出判断。不幸的是,其中一些判断是负面的,尤其是当涉及到黑人对语言的使用时。信不信由你,并不是每个人的声音都是一样的,即使他们使用的是相同的单词和韵律。语言学家称之为“语言歧视”,这意味着人们会根据他们说话的方式来判断他们说了什么,作为一名研究人员,我正在建议研究这些现象的人通过从多个领域汲取知识来更好地理解这些现象:另一方面了解人们如何使用语言的社会机制,另一方面更好地理解语言的心理(认知)过程。我将定义语言歧视,并简要介绍语言学作为一个领域的历史。我希望我的工作能激励其他研究人员在他们关于语言、语言歧视和社会正义的工作中融入所有的因素,包括认知和社会因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics publishes research on key topics in the broad field of applied linguistics. Each issue is thematic, providing a variety of perspectives on the topic through research summaries, critical overviews, position papers and empirical studies. Being responsive to the field, some issues are tied to the theme of that year''s annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Also, at regular intervals an issue will take the approach of covering applied linguistics as a field more broadly, including coverage of critical or controversial topics. ARAL provides cutting-edge and timely articles on a wide number of areas, including language learning and pedagogy, second language acquisition, sociolinguistics, language policy and planning, language assessment, and research design and methodology, to name just a few.
期刊最新文献
Domain-specific research methods in instructed second language acquisition: A next step for research integrity and impact Methodological characteristics in technology-mediated task-based language teaching research: Current practices and future directions A methodological proposal for conlang evaluation Extramural English as an individual difference variable in L2 research: Methodology matters The future of replication in applied linguistics: Toward a standard for replication studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1