Using statistical and interval-based approaches to propagate snow measurement uncertainty to structural reliability

Á. Rózsás, M. Sýkora
{"title":"Using statistical and interval-based approaches to propagate snow measurement uncertainty to structural reliability","authors":"Á. Rózsás, M. Sýkora","doi":"10.1504/IJRS.2018.10013792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observations are inevitably contaminated with measurement uncertainty, which is a predominant source of uncertainty in some cases. In present practice probabilistic models are typically fitted to measurements without proper consideration of this uncertainty. Hence, this study explores the effect of this simplification on structural reliability and provides recommendations on its appropriate treatment. Statistical and interval-based approaches are used to quantify and propagate measurement uncertainty in probabilistic reliability analysis. The two approaches are critically compared by analysing ground snow measurements that are often affected by large measurement uncertainty. The results indicate that measurement uncertainty may lead to significant (order of magnitude) underestimation of failure probability and should be taken into account in reliability analysis. Ranges of the key parameters are identified where measurement uncertainty should be considered. For practical applications, the lower interval bound and predictive reliability index are recommended as point estimates using interval and statistical analysis, respectively. The point estimates should be accompanied by uncertainty intervals, which convey valuable information about the credibility of results.","PeriodicalId":39031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reliability and Safety","volume":"12 1","pages":"46-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reliability and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2018.10013792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observations are inevitably contaminated with measurement uncertainty, which is a predominant source of uncertainty in some cases. In present practice probabilistic models are typically fitted to measurements without proper consideration of this uncertainty. Hence, this study explores the effect of this simplification on structural reliability and provides recommendations on its appropriate treatment. Statistical and interval-based approaches are used to quantify and propagate measurement uncertainty in probabilistic reliability analysis. The two approaches are critically compared by analysing ground snow measurements that are often affected by large measurement uncertainty. The results indicate that measurement uncertainty may lead to significant (order of magnitude) underestimation of failure probability and should be taken into account in reliability analysis. Ranges of the key parameters are identified where measurement uncertainty should be considered. For practical applications, the lower interval bound and predictive reliability index are recommended as point estimates using interval and statistical analysis, respectively. The point estimates should be accompanied by uncertainty intervals, which convey valuable information about the credibility of results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用统计和基于区间的方法将积雪测量不确定性传播到结构可靠性
观测不可避免地受到测量不确定性的污染,在某些情况下,测量不确定性是不确定性的主要来源。在目前的实践中,概率模型通常在没有适当考虑这种不确定性的情况下适用于测量。因此,本研究探讨了这种简化对结构可靠性的影响,并就其适当处理提出了建议。基于统计和区间的方法用于量化和传播概率可靠性分析中的测量不确定性。通过分析经常受到较大测量不确定性影响的地面雪测量,对这两种方法进行了严格的比较。结果表明,测量不确定性可能导致对失效概率的显著(数量级)低估,在可靠性分析中应予以考虑。在应考虑测量不确定度的地方,确定关键参数的范围。对于实际应用,建议分别使用区间分析和统计分析将区间下限和预测可靠性指数作为点估计。点估计值应附有不确定性区间,该区间传达了有关结果可信度的宝贵信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Reliability and Safety
International Journal of Reliability and Safety Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
About the reliability analysis of complex dynamical systems via fluidification: a numerical approach Prediction of human performance using EEG data to improve safety and productivity in the mines. Cognitive dimensions of organisational reliability: a scoping review The influence of manufacturing digitisation on safety management and reliability engineering The impact of organisational commitment on the safety climate in airline employees: the mediation effect of collective gratitude and risk perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1