Educational Policies of Writing and Reading (A commentary on D.G. Ryndin’s article “Merab Mamardashvili: event of thought and pedagogic practice”)

Q1 Arts and Humanities Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Pub Date : 2019-03-07 DOI:10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-119-129
A. A. Polonnikov
{"title":"Educational Policies of Writing and Reading (A commentary on D.G. Ryndin’s article “Merab Mamardashvili: event of thought and pedagogic practice”)","authors":"A. A. Polonnikov","doi":"10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-119-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper contains an “asymmetric commentary” on a philosophical text by means of its subsequent placing in the educational contexts. The first of them is related to an explication of the cultural mission of a pedagogical project suggested by the article. The second one is aimed at the analysis of the pedagogical action of the text determined by the writing/reading samples placed in it. The third one performs the function of a counter-text problematizing a pedagogical program of the article being commented. The exhaustion of orientation to symbolic identification with invariant symbols of culture is substantiated. Educational transformation is connected with overcoming the methodological individualism. Education is transformed into a subject of public collaboration. The emphasis in collective work has to be placed not on establishment of the coordinated definition situation, but on the conflict of its interpretations, collision of practical positions and detection of qualitatively various educational prospects. The commentary by means of the trial-and-error method also researches a possibility of building a demonstrative description able to cause dereification effects in the writing/reading processes. It is supposed that deconstructive writing can become a major element of students’ academic competence in the process of university training.","PeriodicalId":37083,"journal":{"name":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-119-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper contains an “asymmetric commentary” on a philosophical text by means of its subsequent placing in the educational contexts. The first of them is related to an explication of the cultural mission of a pedagogical project suggested by the article. The second one is aimed at the analysis of the pedagogical action of the text determined by the writing/reading samples placed in it. The third one performs the function of a counter-text problematizing a pedagogical program of the article being commented. The exhaustion of orientation to symbolic identification with invariant symbols of culture is substantiated. Educational transformation is connected with overcoming the methodological individualism. Education is transformed into a subject of public collaboration. The emphasis in collective work has to be placed not on establishment of the coordinated definition situation, but on the conflict of its interpretations, collision of practical positions and detection of qualitatively various educational prospects. The commentary by means of the trial-and-error method also researches a possibility of building a demonstrative description able to cause dereification effects in the writing/reading processes. It is supposed that deconstructive writing can become a major element of students’ academic competence in the process of university training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写作与阅读的教育政策(评D.G. Ryndin《Merab Mamardashvili:思想与教学实践的事件》一文)
本文通过将哲学文本置于教育语境中的方式,对其进行了“不对称评论”。第一部分是对文章提出的一个教学项目的文化使命的阐释。第二部分旨在分析由其中的写作/阅读样本确定的文本的教学行为。第三部分执行反文本问题化被评论文章的教学程序的功能。对文化不变符号的符号认同取向的耗竭得到了证实。教育转型与克服方法论个人主义有关。教育已转变为公众合作的主题。集体工作的重点不应放在建立协调的定义情况上,而应放在其解释的冲突、实际立场的冲突和对质量上不同的教育前景的检测上。通过试错法的评论还研究了在写作/阅读过程中建立一个能够引起去化效果的示范性描述的可能性。在大学培养过程中,解构写作可以成为学生学术能力的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms for Activating the Personal Potential of Students in the Context of Digitalization of University Education Russia’s State Policy on the Development of Science at Universities: Lessons from the 90s Image of Higher Educational Institutions: Features of Perception by Graduating Class Students The ADDIE Model in Instructional Design: NUST MISIS Case Study Online Education after the Pandemic: Student Problems and Opportunities Research Using Big Data Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1